3,132 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Search videos, analyze channels, extract captions, read comments, and discover trends on YouTube through SandBase. Use when asked for YouTube research, video discovery, channel analysis, content strategy research, comment sentiment, or video transcript extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced web search, content extraction, and site mapping through Tavily via SandBase. Use when asked for web research, URL content extraction, full article reading, news search, or site structure discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse and extract structured content from PDFs, Word documents, and other file formats. Converts documents into clean, machine-readable text for analysis, summarization, data extraction, and content processing workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core agent-browser usage guide. Read this before running any agent-browser commands. Covers the snapshot-and-ref workflow, navigating pages, interacting with elements (click, fill, type, select), extracting text and data, taking screenshots, managing tabs, handling forms and auth, waiting for content, running multiple browser sessions in parallel, and troubleshooting common failures. Use when the user asks to interact with a website, fill a form, click something, extract data, take a screenshot, log into a site, test a web app, or automate any browser task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google search via real Chrome browser (chromux). Use when the user asks to "search Google", "구글 검색", "구글에서 찾아줘", "find articles about", "search the web for", or needs web search results with full page content. Also trigger when: searching a specific site ("search dev.to for..."), finding recent articles/posts about a topic, extracting content from search results, or when WebSearch results are insufficient and real browser rendering is needed. Prefer this over WebSearch when the user wants site-specific search, time-filtered results, or full article body/comments extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract brand identity from a website URL — voice, colors, typography, imagery, values, and target audience — into a structured brand-profile.json. The profile feeds downstream skills (seo-content-writer, email-composer, frontend-design, pro-deck-builder, cross-platform-audit) for brand-consistent output. Use when the user says brand DNA, brand profile, extract brand, analyze brand, brand voice, brand identity, brand colors, or brand style guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse complex documents with IBM's open-source Docling library, which turns PDFs and Office files into structured Markdown or JSON. Use when a user asks to parse a document with tables, extract figures from a document, handle multi-column layouts, convert a complex PDF to structured data, extract content from academic papers, or process documents with mixed layouts. Handles tables, figures, headers, footers, and multi-column text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse architectural drawings, floor plans, and building code compliance documents using Vision AI. Extracts building type, occupancy, floor areas, room layouts, dimensions, and code parameters. Use when: reading PDF floor plans, analyzing architectural drawings, extracting building data from images or scanned documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstructs the workflow behind a past artifact by querying local ax session, recall, and commit history data. Use when a user asks "what made X work", "how was Y shipped/built", "extract workflow from <date|sha>", "workflow around <topic>", "recipe for this feature", or similar. It finds the anchor session or commit, inspects ax sessions, ax recall, and ax sessions show, and returns an ordered read-only narrative with decisions and evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts and records architectural decisions from diffs, conversation context, and explicit choices. Supports automatic extraction from staged changes, deduplication against prior decisions, and persistent ADR-format logging with spec traceability. Use after a significant design or architecture choice, before committing a diff that embeds implicit decisions, or when the same question keeps resurfacing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Document Intelligence REST SDK for TypeScript workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Extract text, tables, and structured data from documents using prebuilt and custom models and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Document Intelligence REST SDK for TypeScript workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Extract text, tables, and structured data from documents using prebuilt and custom models and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure.AI.DocumentIntelligence (.NET) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Azure AI Document Intelligence SDK for .NET. Extract text, tables, and structured data from documents using prebuilt and custom models and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal Web Scraper workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-driven data extraction from 55+ Actors across all major platforms. This skill automatically selects the best Actor for your task and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal Web Scraper workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-driven data extraction from 55+ Actors across all major platforms. This skill automatically selects the best Actor for your task and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate navigable semantic maps from PDF documents. Extracts section structure via font analysis, then runs LLM extraction per section for claims, symbols, and dependencies — all page-anchored. Produces _MAP.md (progressive disclosure), .symbols.json (definition index), .anchors.json (claim references), and a _USAGE.md snippet for CLAUDE.md. Use when analyzing papers, specs, or legal docs; when asked to "map this document", "index this PDF", "what does this paper say"; or when a coding agent needs grounded reference material from a PDF source. Analogous to tree-sitting but for prose documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query, filter, and transform Markdown structurally with mq — a jq-like CLI for Markdown. Use to extract headings/sections/code-blocks/links from .md files, build a table of contents, pull code blocks of a given language, slice or reshape LLM prompt/output Markdown, or batch-transform docs. Triggers on "extract sections from this markdown", "get all the code blocks", "jq for markdown", "mq", or any structural query over Markdown that grep/Read can't do cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route HugeGraph MCP graph data extraction and controlled import/delete tasks to stable public tools. Use when the user asks to extract graph data from text, import structured vertices or edges, verify an import, or asks whether table, SQL, update, or delete graph writes are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract, suggest, and sync tags and categories for blog posts across all major CMS platforms. Supports WordPress REST API, Shopify GraphQL, Ghost Content API, Strapi REST/GraphQL, and Sanity GROQ. Generates tag suggestions from content analysis (keyword frequency, heading extraction, semantic grouping), enforces minimum post-count thresholds to prevent thin tag archives, and syncs taxonomy via authenticated API calls. Use when user says "tags", "categories", "taxonomy", "tag suggestions", "sync tags", "WordPress tags", "Shopify tags".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze images, websites, and Figma files to extract their design and generate a `design.md` with token system, component inventory, and reconstruction notes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, document, replicate, or audit the design of something visual: a screenshot, a URL, a Figma link, a Pinterest reference, a mockup, a competitor's site, a component, a dashboard, a landing page. Also when they ask 'extract the design system from X', 'document the style of Y', 'analyze this visually', 'convert this image into tokens', 'help me replicate this design', 'what palette does this site use', 'how is this built'. Also for single elements: 'copy this navbar', 'recreate this illustration', 'give me a prompt to regenerate this graphic' — element mode outputs a focused element.md, with token-grounded image-model prompts when the element is visual art. If the user brings any visual source and wants to understand it at a design level — this skill should activate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。