「final」の検索結果

Perform a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the work is functionally complete and needs finishing touches—not when the hierarchy, structure, tone, or technical foundation still need major changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants measurable accessibility, performance, responsive, theming, or anti-pattern findings—not when they mainly want an overall UX critique or final visual/detail polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with evidence-linked judgments and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory final risk-focused review for any repository change. Checks security, architecture boundaries, test coverage, and release readiness before closeout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply consistent photo adjustments across a set of images so they look like they were edited together. Use this skill whenever the user says "make my photos look cohesive", "give all these the same style", "apply a warm and golden feel to all of these", "make this cinematic", "match the look across my photos", "edit all my travel photos the same way", "batch edit these", "make these consistent", "fix my phone photos", or uploads a folder of photos and wants a unified, polished result. Also triggers for requests like "apply a preset to all of these", "make these look professional", or "they were shot in mixed lighting — can you fix them all". Outputs direct final image URLs plus an in-chat preview grid and optional Firefly Board link. Access: 🔐 Signed-In required | Gen AI: ❌

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark branch or pull request needs final diff hygiene, validation selection, commit scope, remote topology, and readiness checked before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client-facing red-team deliverable format — codifies the Subject / Observations / Description / Impact / Recommendation / PoC structure used for external red-team engagements (not bug-bounty platform reports). Different audience, different tone, different cadence. Built from an authorized engagement deliverable where 14 findings were packaged into a 52KB MD + 2.2MB DOCX with 16 embedded screenshots. Use when the engagement is 'external red team for an enterprise client' (not H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti), when generating the final report, when the client has specified a custom report format, or when packaging findings into DOCX/PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus a publicly reachable reference video the user is authorized to use. Use when a user has a rough 3D white-model, clay, wireframe, blockout, previs, or animatic clip and wants a finished visual treatment that preserves its shot order, cut timing, camera framing, spatial layout, and motion directions. Distinguishes that structure-preserving job from a continuation beginning at the reference's final state. Do not use for two still endpoints (keyframe-animation), for appending and locally joining a new ending (video-extend-edit), or when still-image references must be combined with the video in one request — first/last-frame anchors conflict with video references in the shipped core, while mixed image/video references are untested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when optimizing Docker builds with BuildKit, designing multi-stage Dockerfiles, leveraging cache mounts, building multi-arch images, choosing distroless vs alpine, or signing images with cosign. Triggers: docker build slow, layer cache not hitting, npm install / pip install reruns, multi-stage final image bloat, glibc vs musl issues, RUN --mount=type=cache, BUILDKIT_INLINE_CACHE, registry cache exporters, qemu emulation for arm64, COPY ordering for cache. NOT for Docker daemon admin, Kubernetes-specific image policies, container security scanning workflows, or Buildpacks (different paradigm).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。