「language」の検索結果

Write a product listing for an overseas marketplace or store, localised for the buyer rather than translated from Chinese: title, bullet points, description, search terms and the compliance claims that must or must not appear. Use when asked 帮我写亚马逊 listing, 跨境电商标题, write a product listing for Amazon, TikTok Shop, Shopee, Lazada, Etsy or Shopify, or localise my listing for the US, UK, Germany or Japan. Produces the listing in the target language within the platform's field limits, a keyword map, a compliance check of every claim, and a list of images the listing needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 回复询盘, 外贸询盘怎么回, 帮我回客户邮件, 阿里国际站询盘回复, 客户只问价格怎么回, 跟进没回复的客户, or reply to a foreign-trade inquiry from a Chinese exporter. Produces a reply email in English (or the buyer's language) with a Chinese version for the sales team, a read of the inquiry's quality and the buyer's likely type, the questions to qualify the buyer, a price or quotation approach without underselling, and a follow-up sequence for no reply, with export-control and sanctions checks flagged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 帮爸妈办医保, 帮父母办养老金认证, 爸妈异地就医备案, 帮老人办银行业务, 父母被诈骗了怎么办, 教爸妈用手机办事, 代办委托书, or help an adult child handle 医保, 社保, 养老金, banking or scam protection for ageing parents in mainland China. Produces a task list for this errand, what the adult child can do remotely versus what needs the parent in person, the documents and authorisation needed, a step list for the parent in very plain large-step language (长辈版) with a call-for-help line, and an anti-scam card, with every local rule marked to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write clear at-home care instructions for a pet owner after a veterinary visit, procedure, or hospitalization. Use when asked to write discharge instructions, go-home notes, post-op care, or medication instructions for a pet owner. Produces plain-language home-care instructions: medications (what/how much/when/how), activity restrictions, what to watch for, warning signs that mean call-now, the recheck plan, and emergency contacts — written so a worried owner can actually follow them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the band agreement before the money or the breakup arrives — who owns the songs, how money splits (writing vs performing distinguished), who owns the name, what happens when someone quits, and the decision rules for offers — decided while everyone still shares a van. Use when a band asks 'how should we split money', 'who owns our songs', 'our drummer quit, what happens', or is about to record/release/sign anything. Produces a plain-language band agreement and the meeting script to agree it. Not legal advice — it's the conversation that makes the lawyer cheap later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check live air quality anywhere with zero API keys — Open-Meteo's air-quality API via curl, decoded from raw PM2.5 and AQI numbers into what they mean for going outside. Use when asked what's the air quality, is it safe to run outside, AQI in my city, or pollution levels right now. Produces the current AQI and pollutant levels, the plain-language health read with the standard bands, and the rerunnable command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a technical spec or proposed change in plain language: what problem it solves, how the solution works, and every schema change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches Reddit using a brand's Brand DNA to find promotable pain-point discussions, target subreddits, and real user search language. Produces a prioritized Reddit opportunity list for content seeding, helpful replies, and prompt research inspiration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:i-have-adhd` or Claude Code `/superloopy:i-have-adhd` invocation, or when a qualifying leading `loopy`/`루피` task receives Superloopy's non-diagnostic ADHD-friendly output overlay. Do not activate from typos, fragmented writing, urgency, grammar, language proficiency, or ordinary discussion of ADHD, attention, focus, accessibility, or cognitive load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Settle what domain terms mean per context, and which repository conventions or language standards (Go, Python) apply. Use when: names disagree or a rename is proposed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kotlin Multiplatform structure and language traps: module splits, expect/actual, Koin and ViewModel scoping, layers, version catalogs, erased overloads, Char and string-resource formatting limits. Use when shaping modules or DI, when a format specifier renders verbatim, or code misbehaves on one platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI. Also the default writing standard for all agent output: 80% ASD-STE100 controlled language plus the format ladder (prose, diagram, HTML page, explainer video).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks about work done outside this session - "check work", "check the others", "check other sessions" - or to accept one: "the session is done, check it", "can we merge it" - in any language. You are the receiving party: treat the report as a claim, verify each part against machine state, name every gap between claimed and true. Verified-ready work merges in the same pass. End with what is left, one next step, and any reply another session needs, ready to paste.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks where the project as a whole stands - "where are we", "what's the big picture", "what have we built", "what is in this project", "map the project", "what does this thing even do", "what is stale", "what can we delete", "update the roadmap" - in any language, and whenever a session report has just been written. It keeps one file, BIG-PICTURE.md: what the product is, every feature with how far it got, which parts nobody has touched, and what is queued next. Age and wiring are measured from git; how far a feature got comes from the reports or says "not checked". Where a tracker is connected it offers to open the queue as tickets, after a yes and never before. Never invents work, never deletes code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when you need the user to act - run a command, paste a secret, click, approve - and whenever they ask how to do something or say they do not know what to do: "step by step", "walk me through it", "what do I do", "what should I do", "I don't understand what to do", "explain what I need to do", in any language. Picking which task comes next is os-whats-next; this skill is for doing the thing in front of you. First earn the ask: try it yourself, find another route, shrink it to the part only they can do. Then one action per step, commands labelled by what they touch, no jargon. Commands are single lines that prompt for any value - typing hidden for secrets - and confirm in plain words. Afterwards verify their step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks what to do next, what is left, or what is blocked - "what's next", "what now", "what should we work on", "anything I can do" - in any language. This skill picks the next piece of work; when the user asks HOW to do a thing or says they do not understand what to do, that is os-step-by-step. Reads the last report, local changes, open pull requests and always the backlog. First finishes what is finished: verified-ready pull requests merge in the same pass. Then sorts the rest into doable-alone and needs-you, ending with one recommended next task in plain words - what it closes or unblocks. Never invents tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks for simpler or shorter about something said or written - "say it simply", "what does this mean", "I don't understand your answer", "too long", "wait, what?", "bro" - in any language, about any text: your own answer, a report, a review comment, an error. "I don't understand what to DO" is os-step-by-step; this skill restates text. It restates for a reader who does not read code: leads with the point, keeps every number, warning and caveat - no facts added, no bad news dropped. A number returns exactly that many points, most important first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。