「proto」の検索結果

Design MVPs, validated learning experiments, and pivot-or-persevere decisions using Build-Measure-Learn. Use when the user mentions "MVP scope", "validated learning", "pivot or persevere", "vanity metrics", "test assumptions", "innovation accounting", "build-measure-learn", "minimum viable experiment", "should we pivot", "test a business idea cheaply", or "build the smallest version first". Also trigger when deciding what to include in a first version, measuring startup progress, or evaluating whether to change direction on a product bet. Covers innovation accounting and actionable metrics. For 5-day prototype testing, see design-sprint. For customer motivation analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a shipped app that works but feels rough to a product that fits the job, flows without friction, reads clearly, and persuades honestly. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, ux-heuristics, design-everyday-things, refactoring-ui, microinteractions, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, high-perf-browser, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (CUSTOMER.md, DESIGN.md, POSITIONING.md, IMPROVE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a clunky product, cut UX friction, sharpen in-app copy, or says 'the app works but feels rough'. Not for code, tests, or hardening - use improve-code-quality (fresh prototype) or remove-technical-debt (aged); no app yet, create-app; needs growth loops, grow-app; marketing-site friction, improve-website; one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Talk to customers without leading them using Mom Test rules: discuss their life not your idea, ask about specifics in the past, and talk less. Use when the user mentions "customer interviews", "validate my idea", "users say they want it but dont buy", "leading questions", "The Mom Test", "customer feedback bias", or "interview script". Also trigger when preparing user-research questions, interpreting ambiguous feedback, or designing customer-discovery that avoids false positives. Covers commitment and advancement, avoiding compliments, and extracting signal from noise. For product-market fit, see jobs-to-be-done. For rapid prototype testing, see design-sprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says 'it works but it is slow and getting worse'. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from an app idea to a deliberate architecture: boundaries, domain model, data decisions, and resilience, making only the expensive-to-reverse decisions and deferring the rest. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, system-design, ddia-systems, software-design-philosophy, release-it, pragmatic-programmer, 37signals-way - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (ARCHITECTURE.md, DESIGN-CODE-ARCHITECTURE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to design a new app's architecture, choose boundaries and a domain model, decide monolith versus microservices, or says 'how should I structure this app'. If a codebase already exists, use remove-technical-debt (aged), improve-code-quality (fresh prototype), or architecture-optimization (slow but working); if unvalidated, run create-business or create-app first. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging frameworks for finding and fixing bugs - includes root cause analysis, defense-in-depth validation, and verification protocols

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers - discover, analyze, and execute tools/prompts/resources from configured MCP servers. Use when working with MCP integrations, need to discover available MCP capabilities, filter MCP tools for specific tasks, execute MCP tools programmatically, access MCP prompts/resources, or implement MCP client functionality. Supports intelligent tool selection, multi-server management, and context-efficient capability discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This workflow, known as RIPER-5, is designed exclusively for handling complex software engineering tasks such as system design, architectural refactoring, bug diagnosis, performance optimization, and multi-component integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OMC agent catalog, available tools, team pipeline routing, commit protocol, and skills registry. Auto-loads when delegating to agents, using OMC tools, orchestrating teams, making commits, or invoking skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run inference on Fireworks AI — direct, through the Leanmcp AI Gateway proxy (aigateway.leanmcp.com) for observability, or via LiteLLM / the OpenAI SDK / raw HTTP. Covers the endpoint-and-key matrix for each route, serverless vs dedicated deployments and their cold starts, browsing and filtering the model catalogue, reasoning models that return content:null with the answer in reasoning_content, function calling, concurrency and load testing, and runner scripts where many models share one protocol with a --use-proxy toggle. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Fireworks, FIREWORKS_API_KEY, api.fireworks.ai, fireworks_ai/ model ids, accounts/fireworks/models/..., a Fireworks deployment id, the Leanmcp gateway or LEANMCP_API_KEY, app.leanmcp.com observability, or gpt-oss / kimi / glm / qwen / deepseek served on Fireworks; wants to route LLM calls through a proxy for logging or cost tracking; is debugging empty responses, 404s, scope errors, cold starts, or "the gateway isn't working"; wants to pick a Fireworks model with tool calling; or wants to sweep several models over one benchmark. Reach for it even on vague asks like "why is this model returning nothing" or "set up inference for these models" when Fireworks is in play.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, build, redesign, or modify browser-visible web interfaces with product-quality composition, visual systems, interaction states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and browser visual QA. Use for HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React, Vue, or Svelte pages and components, landing pages, dashboards, admin tools, settings, forms, onboarding, responsive layouts, prototypes, and any frontend change that alters visible browser output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Xiaodu smart device control skill via MCP protocol. Control Xiaodu devices and ecosystem hardware for smart home IoT tasks, scene automation, and physical interaction. Use when user wants to control smart home devices or IoT equipment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

基于协议的依赖注入，用于可测试的Swift代码——使用聚焦协议和Swift Testing模拟文件系统、网络和外部API。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Use when conducting evidence-based reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping revi...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Instituti...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs internal, external, temporal, and functional validation strategies at the protocol stage for medical research studies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。