783 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orchestrate JavaScript/TypeScript applications with .NET Aspire. Use when building Node.js APIs, React/Vue/Svelte frontends, or Vite apps that need service discovery, telemetry, and deployment orchestration via Aspire's AppHost. Covers AddViteApp, AddNodeApp, AddJavaScriptApp, package mana...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update feature specifications from natural language descriptions. Use when starting new features or refining requirements. Generates spec.md with user stories, functional requirements, and acceptance criteria following spec-driven development methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview me about this card to develop the acceptance criteria
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use CodexBar CLI local cost usage to summarize per-model usage for Codex or Claude, including the current (most recent) model or a full model breakdown. Trigger when asked for model-level usage/cost data from codexbar, or when you need a scriptable per-model summary from codexbar cost JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify Rash Studio scenes, ActionScript subset behavior, resource links, portable embeds, exports, and desktop or mobile interaction. Use for Rash acceptance checks, compatibility review, security review, or release validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acceptance-test newly added features using browser automation, happy-path flows, screenshots, UX notes, and a written report. Use when asked to test a feature, verify a recent UI change, or check whether an app workflow works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break an application or feature into thin vertical user-story slices with clear acceptance criteria and user-observable value. Use when planning a backlog, decomposing a feature, writing implementation-ready stories, or turning requirements into deliverable slices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define one thin vertical slice with target behavior, risks, and acceptance criteria. Use when scoping the next piece of work before building, or when a slice from `memory/PLAN.md` needs precise definition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST HB 151) — the practical statistics reference for engineering, metrology, and quality. Use for: exploratory data analysis and the four univariate assumptions (4-plot); measurement process characterization including bias/precision, calibration designs, gauge R&R, and ISO/GUM uncertainty budgets; production process characterization (stability vs. capability); process modeling and regression (LS/WLS/NLS/LOESS); design of experiments (screening, fractional/factorial, response-surface, Taguchi); statistical process control (Shewhart/CUSUM/EWMA charts, capability indices, acceptance sampling); product/process comparisons (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for 1/2/3+ groups, ANOVA, multiple comparisons); and reliability (lifetime & repair-rate models, accelerated testing, reliability growth). Scope limits: this is applied frequentist statistics for measurement and quality — it does NOT reproduce the per-distribution formula galleries, worked case studies, datasets, plot images, or Dataplot/R code of the original web Handbook (those are described, not copied); it is thin on modern machine learning, Bayesian methods beyond conjugate reliability priors, time-series/forecasting, and Bayesian experimental design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from MIL-STD-882E (DoD System Safety). Use for the system safety process, hazard analysis tasks (PHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA), the risk assessment matrix (severity x probability), software safety criticality, and risk acceptance. US-gov public domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Especialista para todo el proceso de solicitud de empleo. Analiza ofertas de trabajo, optimiza perfiles (LinkedIn/CV) y genera cartas de presentación personalizadas. Genera CVs en ASCII a partir de una base de datos SQLite y una estructura de carpetas. cv_generator.py está adaptado de forma independiente -- no requiere la ejecución de BACH.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
スティーブン・ヘイズによるアクセプタンス＆コミットメント・セラピー（ACT）：心理的柔軟性の6つのコアプロセスを備えたヘキサフレックス・モデル。
史蒂芬·海斯（Steven Hayes）的接纳承诺疗法（ACT）：包含心理灵活性六大核心过程的 Hexaflex 模型。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT) Стивенса Хейса: модель Гексафлекс с шестью ключевыми процессами психологической гибкости.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Role-based multi-model strategy. The model catalog lives in a local configuration file instead of the skill text -- roles (thinker/decision-maker, long-running worker, draft generator, reviewer/acceptance, escalation), reasoning effort as an independent axis, mandatory review for draft models, provider switching for independent reviews, budgets, delegation flow, and cost/quality of small workers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages an incoming non-disclosure agreement against the organisation's written standard NDA positions and returns a DRAFT triage pack: a clause-by-clause deviations table with a severity band, a suggested response per clause quoted from the positions document, open questions and a governing-law flag, all for counsel to decide. Never gives legal advice or an acceptability call. Use when the user asks to "triage this NDA against our standard positions", "screen this confidentiality agreement before it goes to legal", "red-flag this mutual NDA", "first-pass the counterparty's NDA" or "is this NDA standard or does it need counsel". Do not use for a full review of an MSA, SOW, licence or any whole contract, use contract-review-pack instead; for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to register/query a social channel, record channel state, cadence, governance, voice adaptation, UGC permission, or advocacy facts; curates them through the append-only channels event stream and derived views. Not for ECHO scoring — use social-quality-auditor; not for channel selection — use channel-portfolio-planner. 渠道台账/账号档案/UGC授权记录
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI applications using the Azure AI Projects Python SDK (azure-ai-projects). Use when working with Foundry project clients, creating versioned agents with PromptAgentDefinition, running evalua...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。