「qa」の検索結果

Use before any review_criterion approval or column move - the evidence each verdict needs, how to treat skipped, blocked and intermittent cases, and which exit a blocker takes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for Superloopy clone or asks to clone, rebuild, reverse-engineer, replicate, or copy a website or page into a Superloopy-governed implementation. Triggers on "loopy clone", target URLs plus requests such as "clone this site", "rebuild this page", "make a copy of this website", "pixel-perfect clone", or "AI website clone". Requires browser automation and records component specs, assets, implementation, build output, and visual QA as Superloopy evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, write, art-direct, generate, and package a coherent 2-10 image minimal-zine social series from notes, articles, photographs, travel stories, products, reviews, cultural topics, data, PDFs, or mixed subjects. Use for Xiaohongshu/小红书图片, Instagram carousels, social visual essays, recommendation posts, photo diaries, evidence-backed explainers, or any multi-image editorial sequence. Produces analysis, card roles, subject-aware composition, saved prompts, real raster images, natural caption copy, evidence provenance when needed, and series-level QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides iOS testing with XCTest, XCUITest, Swift Testing, simctl, and xcresult. Use when choosing destinations, controlling flakes, or parsing test artifacts for native apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs NUnit-based C# test suites for API, component, and integration coverage. Use when creating fixtures, wiring Testcontainers, or reducing flaky CI behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and debugs Playwright E2E suites. Use when authoring browser tests, fixing flakes, or hardening Playwright CI and locator strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs performance and load testing: stress, spike, soak, capacity, CI budget gates. Use when planning load tests or perf gates; not code or SQL tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers and triages recent arXiv papers for AI/ML, agents, and software/QA. Use when scouting categories, arXiv IDs, or source lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs risk-based test strategy for software delivery. Use when defining coverage, setting CI gates, managing flaky tests, choosing test layers, or establishing release criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactors code while preserving behavior. Use when reducing technical debt, planning codemods, applying strangler migrations, or tightening CI guardrails around risky changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests API contracts for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, AsyncAPI, and webhooks. Use when adding schema validation or breaking-change gates (Pact, can-i-deploy, oasdiff, buf); not API design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests apps as an ICP persona through browser automation and reports friction, fixes, and risks. Use when running persona-based, ICP, or synthetic-user testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs Android testing with Espresso, UI Automator, Robolectric, and Compose. Use when planning device matrices, emulator CI, Compose test migration, screenshots, or flakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds security testing pipelines for SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets, containers. Use when wiring scanners into CI or regression gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and enforces documentation quality. Use when checking coverage, freshness, runbook validity, AI-instruction coverage, or cleaning stale/duplicate markdown after LLM edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugs crashes, regressions, flakes, and production bugs systematically. Use when diagnosing stack traces, logs, or profiling data; not perf tuning or incident command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds accessibility testing for WCAG 2.2 audits, CI gates, mobile audits, and EAA/ADA/VPAT evidence. Use when adding axe-core, Lighthouse, or screen-reader tests; not fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements OpenTelemetry logs/metrics/traces, SLI/SLO gates, burn-rate alerts, and APM integrations. Use when adding or validating observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and tests distributed-system resilience. Use when adding retries, deadlines, hedging, circuit breakers, overload protection, chaos experiments, or SLO reliability gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs LLM, agent, responsible-AI, and multimodal evals. Use when measuring quality, fairness, grounding, safety, or judge reliability. Not for test harnesses (qa-agent-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate HitKeep safely in isolated Git worktrees. Use when inspecting workspace state, resolving ports or URLs, starting or stopping development services, coordinating concurrent agents or QA runs, reusing active runs, reading bounded logs, or preparing a secret-free handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, investigate, and report HitKeep quality gates through hk. Use while iterating, before calling contributor work complete, when choosing change-aware versus PR-parity versus exhaustive validation, when CI parity matters, or when investigating a failed or asynchronous gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。