「refactor」の検索結果

Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token-efficient code analysis via 5-layer stack (AST, Call Graph, CFG, DFG, PDG). 95% token savings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for Spring Boot using JUnit 5, Mockito, MockMvc, Testcontainers, and JaCoCo. Use when adding features, fixing bugs, or refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent planning system with 3 markdown files (PLAN.md, PROGRESS.md, CONTEXT.md). Use when starting large features, multi-session work, or complex refactoring. Auto-tracks commits in PROGRESS.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find unused functions and dead code in the codebase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AST-based code search and refactoring via ast-grep MCP

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surgical code fixer for Bug Hunter. Implements minimal, precise fixes for verified bugs. Uses doc-lookup (Context Hub + Context7) to verify correct API usage in patches. Respects fix strategy classifications (safe-autofix vs manual-review vs larger-refactor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplification audit or authorized codebase simplification whose stated objective is to remove accidental complexity. Use for evidence-backed deletion or consolidation of dead code, duplicate state, redundant APIs or layers, ownerless abstractions, obsolete compatibility or design records, and over-engineering in any language; also use for 代码简化 or 熵回收. Do not use for general code review, onboarding, style-only refactoring, or performance tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lazy senior dev mode: the smallest change that fully solves the task, and a reply a busy human understands in one read. Use on any coding task (writing, fixing, refactoring, reviewing, choosing dependencies) and when the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "simplest solution", "yagni", or complains about over-engineering or bloat. Levels: lite, full (default), ultra.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `QuickDup` clone detector for .NET repositories. Use when a repo needs duplicate C# code discovery, structural clone detection, DRY refactoring candidates, or repeatable duplication. USE FOR: the repo wants QuickDup; the team needs repeatable duplicate-code scans for C#; the user asks about DRY cleanup, copy-paste detection, clone detection, or duplicate. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; repos that intentionally use a different clone detector and do not want overlap. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer. USE FOR: general .NET requests without a narrower framework; C# implementation, debugging, review, or refactoring; routing to framework and tooling skills. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; tasks already covered by a narrower .NET skill. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies QML best practices when producing or working with QML source code. Use whenever QML code is the primary subject: writing, reviewing, fixing, refactoring, optimizing, or debugging QML files, components, or bindings. Do NOT trigger for purely conversational QML questions where no code is produced or examined (e.g. "explain how anchors work").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements a single feature in the pi-mono `todotools` builtin extension work. Use for refactoring, continuation runtime, config resolver, prompt builder, test authoring, golden snapshots, CHANGELOG entries, and harness helpers. Does NOT do manual tmux QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

测试驱动开发。当用户想以测试先行构建功能或修复 bug、提到 "red-green-refactor"，或想要集成测试时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent Kubernetes hallucinations by diagnosing and fixing failure modes: insecure workload defaults, resource starvation, network exposure, privilege sprawl, fragile rollouts, and API drift. Use when generating, reviewing, refactoring, or migrating manifests, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays, cluster policies, and platform-specific Kubernetes work for EKS, GKE, AKS, OpenShift, GitOps controllers, or observability stacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement or improve Java logging and observability — including selecting SLF4J with Logback/Log4j2, applying proper log levels (ERROR, WARN, INFO, DEBUG, TRACE), parameterized logging, correlation context, secure logging without sensitive data exposure, environment-specific configuration, log aggregation, monitoring, and alerting. This should trigger for requests such as Improve logging; Apply logging; Refactor logging; Add logging support; Review SLF4J structured logging in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up JMeter performance testing for a Java project — including creating the run-jmeter.sh script from the exact template, configuring load tests with loops, threads, and ramp-up, or running performance tests from the project root with custom or default settings. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with JMeter performance testing; Apply JMeter performance testing; Refactor the code with JMeter performance testing; Add JMeter support; Create a JMeter test plan for a Java service. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement or improve distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry in Java — including trace/span modeling, context propagation, semantic conventions, span attributes/events/status, sampling strategy, baggage usage, privacy safeguards, and backend integration with OTLP collectors. This should trigger for requests such as Improve tracing; Apply OpenTelemetry tracing; Add distributed tracing; Refactor tracing instrumentation; Instrument Java services with OpenTelemetry spans. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up Java application profiling to detect and measure performance issues — including trusted preinstalled async-profiler v4.x setup, problem-driven profiling (CPU, memory, threading, GC, I/O), interactive profiling scripts, JFR integration with Java 25 (JEP 518, JEP 520), or collecting profiling data with flamegraphs and JFR recordings. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with profiling; Apply Profiling; Refactor the code with profiling; Add profiling support; Collect JFR or async-profiler data for Java performance. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。