「regression」の検索結果

Covers Flutter testing across all three layers: unit tests (business logic, ViewModels, repositories), widget tests (UI rendering, interactions, golden regression), and integration/E2E tests (full app flows, native OS interactions). Use this skill when writing any Flutter test, setting up mocking with mocktail or mockito, implementing golden file tests, debugging async failures (pumpAndSettle timeouts, Timer leaks, FakeAsync deadlocks), fixing cross-platform golden pixel diffs in CI/CD, testing state management (Riverpod/BLoC/Provider), handling permission dialogs or native system UI with Patrol, or troubleshooting MediaQuery/Theme missing errors in widget tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review FriendlyBet quality, regression risk, test plans, release readiness, version bump discipline, scoring/locking correctness, provider fallback behavior, and dirty-worktree safety. Use before shipping app code, scoring changes, migrations, sports integrations, copy updates, PWA cache changes, or any risky user-facing flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en QA exploratoire v4 (tests systématiques, chasse aux bugs, preuves, rapports, régression)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en tests d'agents IA (tests unitaires, intégration, régression, guardrails, red teaming agents)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write focused tdmcp tests for one assigned coverage gap. Use for Vitest/msw unit tests, integration tests, bridge tests, CLI/config/resource tests, and regression tests that should raise coverage without weakening behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pixel-based motion and UI change analysis from frame sequences or screenshots using computer vision and visual comparison. Use when `.transition` or visual effects are not observable via MotionEyes logs, when you only have screenshots/video, when you need regression diffs across builds, or when you need to summarize on-screen changes without instrumentation. Do not use when MotionEyes traces are available and you need precise timing/values; use `motioneyes-animation-debug` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need the current position in the Lean spec-driven pipeline, or any deterministic check of a Cradle project — status, golden regression, Lean layer walls, regeneration impact, unslop lint, ddd cleanup. Runs the scripts under scripts/ and reports their output verbatim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after the Lean model changed and before touching backend code — regenerates Kotlin from Lean, lists changed generated symbols, the hand-written files and contract tests that reference them, and golden regressions, so the blast radius is known before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive testing strategies including unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, property-based testing, visual regression, and test automation. Use when writing tests, setting up testing frameworks, or designing test coverage strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects running surveys. Watches active surveys for score regressions (NPS / CSAT / rating drops), response-volume drops, abandonment spikes, and targeting drift, AND aggregates open-text responses into recurring themes the team should know about (clusters of complaints, praise, feature requests). Emits findings only when a theme or anomaly clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects with web traffic. Watches the acquisition and site-health layer the web analytics product reports on: per-channel session volume diverging from the site's own rhythm (an acquisition source silently collapsing or surging), attribution breakage (paid/campaign traffic reclassifying into Direct or Unknown when tagging breaks), landing pages that break (bounce-rate steps, 404 spikes, entry-path cliffs), and page-performance regressions (web vitals p75 steps). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, and stack-trace activity-name patterns. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects collecting Content Security Policy (CSP) violation reports. Watches `$csp_violation` events for fresh blocked-URL clusters, per-directive bursts, page-scoped regressions after deploys, and suspicious third-party domains that may indicate a compromised script. Emits aggregated findings only when a cluster clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using revenue analytics. Watches the derived revenue product for upstream failures (Stripe sync stalls, capture regressions), config drift (missing subscription property, currency mix surprises, broken Stripe↔person joins, deferred-revenue gaps), and goal-miss escalations. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。