「review」の検索結果

Review a business plan from the perspective of a hostile devil's advocate. Asks: what kills this in month 6? What's everyone politely not mentioning? Outputs a verdict — EXISTENTIAL RISK / SOLVABLE RISKS / LOW-RISK / WRONG QUESTION. Use after the investor/customer/operator reviews are done, as the final gauntlet before committing real time and money. Triggered by: 'skeptic review', 'devil's advocate', 'what would kill this', 'red team this', '泼冷水', '杀手在哪'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vault, what they have been learning about lately, or what they should look at next, and when a scheduled review task fires. Do NOT use for structural linting, for ingesting sources, or for answering a specific factual question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to add, audit, implement, or optimize Open Graph metadata for social sharing, including og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url, Facebook previews, LinkedIn previews, or social share previews. For a full metadata lifecycle use page-metadata; for X-specific previews use twitter-cards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a structured maintainer-style PR review for the mariadb-operator repository. Gathers PR context, triages the change, and evaluates correctness, safety, pitfalls, backwards compatibility and code quality against the project conventions documented in AGENTS.md. Use whenever the user mentions a mariadb-operator PR number or URL and wants any kind of judgment on it — "review this PR", "what do you think of #1234", "is this safe to merge", "assess this diff", "take a look at this change" — even if they don't literally say "review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post a comment (or a formal PR review) to a GitHub issue or pull request in mariadb-operator/mariadb-operator. Use whenever the user wants to publish something to GitHub for this repo — "comment on issue #123", "post this as a PR comment", "leave a note on #456", "reply on the PR" — and especially when they want the output of the mariadb-operator-pr-review skill delivered to GitHub instead of just shown in chat, e.g. "review PR #1234 and post it as a comment" or "post the review results to the PR". Always confirms the exact comment text with the user before publishing — never posts autonomously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a guided, end-to-end security review of a Power Pages site and consolidates every finding into one HTML report covering source code and dependencies, the live site, browser headers, firewall, authentication, and role-based permissions. Use when the user wants a full security review, a release-readiness check before publishing, a code-and-config check during development, live site monitoring, or asks open-ended questions like "review my site security", "is my site safe to ship", "do a security check", "monitor my site" — even if they do not name the individual checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Literature review for academic and R&D research: search strategy, source assessment, synthesis, and citation management. Use when conducting a systematic literature review, building a bibliography, or preparing a research-grounded report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize a week of inputs (calendar, tasks, journal, OKR check-ins) into a structured review with wins, learnings, blockers, and next-week priorities. Use for a Friday/Sunday weekly review, GTD review, or OKR check-in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contract review assistant analyzing agreements against playbooks. GREEN/YELLOW/RED severity. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, SaaS agreements, service agreements, or generating redline suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from multiple documents into comparison matrix with citations. Use for bulk document review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Produces issue log with redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, deadlines. Use when reviewing NDAs for negotiation or approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run reputation programs: reviews, sentiment, brand safety. Crisis → crisis-response; one review → review-response. "get more Google reviews"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations. Triggers on: 'tabular review', 'document matrix', 'extract from documents', 'compare across documents', 'review multiple contracts'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams. Produce an annual Panel Health Report synthesising scorecard data, billing compliance, and step-out patterns into per-firm recommendations — Retain, Watch, Improvement Plan, or Exit Review. Produce a firm exit pack: formal exit notice with active matter transition plan, plus an internal exit record. Identify practice area, geographic, or tier gaps and produce a structured Coverage Gap Report with remediation options. Produce a Panel Refresh Brief as a scoped input to the RFP process. Trigger on: 'review our panel', 'annual panel review', 'is our panel working', 'which firms should we exit', 'write the exit notice', 'coverage gap', 'we don't have anyone for restructuring', 'refresh the panel', 'panel rationalisation', 'too many firms', 'step-out problem', 'do we have the right firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Seven-role depersonalised panel review of framework artefacts (KUD, criterion bank, LT definition, crosswalk, scope-and-sequence) in sequential-isolation mode. Gate rule mean>=88 AND no role<70.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified", "is this actually done", "maker checker", "second pair of eyes on this change". Not for prose, docs or typo edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Chinese wealth management client meetings with performance summaries, talking points, and relationship context. Adapted from the original client-review skill for A-share portfolios and Chinese client conventions. Triggers on "A股客户回顾", "客户会议准备", "client review China", "wealth client review", "客户回访准备", or "prepare for client meeting [client]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates smart App Store review prompt infrastructure with configurable conditions and platform detection. Use when user wants to add review prompts, request ratings, or implement StoreKit reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。