「strategy」の検索結果

Decision needed + recommendation + evidence + tradeoffs, 把复杂材料压成可拍板的一页

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

定位图 + 功能矩阵 + 价格对比 + 机会窗口, 把竞品资料转成产品决策报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the contribution flow is in scope: opening an issue, drafting or editing a PR body, splitting a change into chained/stacked PRs, or auditing a PR before requesting review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-stage fallback strategy for PDF/document extraction using sequential tool alternatives

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart contract development advisor based on Trail of Bits' best practices. Analyzes codebase to generate documentation/specifications, review architecture, check upgradeability patterns, assess implementation quality, identify pitfalls, review dependencies, and evaluate testing. Use when asking whether a smart contract project follows development best practices, reviewing on-chain/off-chain split, upgradeability, or delegatecall proxy patterns against guidelines, or seeking recommendations on contract design, inheritance, events, documentation, dependencies, or test strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective review of a feature plan or requirements doc before development begins. Evaluates from strategy, design/UX, and engineering angles to catch gaps early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when translating a specific event, policy change, macro shock, or industry development into public-equity issuer, sector, earnings, valuation, positioning, and portfolio implications. Do not use for standalone macro strategy, rates, FX, credit, futures, or generic market commentary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set browser-game architecture before implementation. Use when the user needs engine choice, simulation and render boundaries, input model, asset organization, or save/debug/performance strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, lay out, critique, and explain data visualizations. Use when the user asks what visualization fits a dataset or goal, how a chart, dashboard, operational workspace, UML-like diagram, or software architecture diagram should be composed or interacted with, asks for visual page design, a layout mockup, generated large-screen and mobile concept images, or to be shown what a visualization could look like, when domain-native contextual surfaces or graphical backgrounds may help, when scrollytelling or parallax might be appropriate, wants a critique of an existing visualization, or needs guidance grounded in trusted visualization theory and practice. For advanced visual design or page-layout prompts where composition affects understanding, Codex must generate and show both large-screen and mobile portrait image concepts before implementation or text-only design handoff, plus mobile landscape when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test data visualizations and dashboards. Use when the user needs chart or diagram test strategy, screenshot or image diff testing, visual regression, mocked or synthetic chart data, component or unit tests, E2E dashboard QA, interactive UML-like diagram verification, scroll-driven story verification, export verification, or guidance on avoiding brittle over-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a strategic roadmap across prioritization, epic definition, stakeholder alignment, and sequencing. Use when turning strategy into a release plan that teams can execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize stakeholders using two complementary grids. Use when setting engagement strategy and surfacing whose voice needs elevating after stakeholder identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an evidence-cited SWOT of one company — yours or a competitor's — from public sources, ending with the S-O/W-T crossings. Use for strategy reviews, board prep, or competitor depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a company research brief with executive quotes, product strategy, and org context. Use when preparing for interviews, competitive analysis, partnerships, or market-entry work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate feature investments using revenue impact, cost structure, ROI, and strategy. Use when deciding whether a feature deserves investment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal forces. Use when external market shifts could materially affect a product, roadmap, or strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) specialist — the technical, on-page publishing work that makes a given page or site discoverable, understandable, trustworthy, quotable, and fresh for AI answer engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, Bing Copilot, Perplexity). Use when asked to 'optimize this page/site for GEO', 'optimize for AI search / answer engines', 'get my page cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity', 'improve AI visibility/citability', 'write an llms.txt', 'add citation-ready structure or schema for AI answers', 'otimizar para busca com IA', or to audit/create/improve a codebase for generative search. Do NOT use for AI-driven SEO content strategy or programmatic pages at scale (use ai-seo), classic keyword/SERP ranking (use seo), accessibility (use web-accessibility), or multi-area site audits (use web-quality-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to turn content into revenue, build a content-led GTM motion, reverse engineer distribution, or repurpose content across platforms. Also use when the user mentions 'content marketing,' 'content-led growth,' 'content to pipeline,' 'distribution,' 'content repurposing,' 'content strategy,' 'thought leadership,' 'newsletter,' 'content flywheel,' 'organic growth.' This skill covers content-to-revenue systems from creation through pipeline attribution. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to price an AI product, choose a charge metric, design pricing tiers, or optimize margins. Also use when the user mentions 'AI pricing,' 'usage-based pricing,' 'consumption pricing,' 'outcome pricing,' 'BYOK,' 'bring your own key,' 'per-seat pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'AI margins,' 'cost per token,' or 'pricing model.' This skill covers pricing strategy, packaging, and margin management for AI-native products. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to sell through social media, optimize LinkedIn for sales, build DM sequences, or convert content engagement into pipeline. Also use when the user mentions 'social selling,' 'LinkedIn selling,' 'LinkedIn DMs,' 'social prospecting,' 'LinkedIn Sales Navigator,' 'DM sequences,' 'LinkedIn outreach,' 'social pipeline,' or 'LinkedIn optimization.' This skill covers social selling strategy from profile optimization through DM-to-deal conversion. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional embedded DDD strategic analysis for bounded contexts. Use when asking how to split a monolith, size components before extraction, find duplicated domain logic, clean up module hierarchy, measure coupling between modules, or group components into services. Do NOT use for phased extraction roadmaps or prioritization without the prior analysis steps (use decomposition-planning-roadmap after this pipeline), end-to-end legacy migration strategy writeups (use legacy-migration-planner), pure infrastructure capacity sizing, or when you only need DDD without the structural pipeline (install domain-analysis standalone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。