「user」の検索結果

Deploys the current project to a live HTTPS URL via Cybrix. Activates on any request to make the current project public, get a URL for it, deploy it, ship it, host it, publish it, put it online, or make it live — including casual phrasings like "send this to the internet", "share this as a link", "give me a URL", "make this accessible online". Activates whether the user mentions Cybrix by name or not (when no other host like Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, Railway, or Render is named). Also activates on equivalent phrases in other languages — Russian ("задеплой", "опубликуй", "выложи в сеть", "запушь это в инет", "сделай ссылку"), Spanish ("despliega esto", "publica esto", "ponlo en línea"), German ("deploy das mal", "stelle das online"), and other common languages where the intent is clearly to make a project publicly accessible via URL. Uses heuristic detection to determine if a project is static or needs a server runtime — works with any framework, not just a known list. Automatically detects and handles environment variables so the build receives everything it needs. Returns a live URL on *.cbrx.cc or a user-configured custom domain. Does NOT activate when the user explicitly names a different host (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, Railway, Render).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' or 'sharpen the messaging.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved rather than rewritten from scratch. For writing new copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through obtaining and configuring a Vapi API key. Use when the user needs to set up Vapi, when API calls fail due to missing keys, or when the user mentions needing access to Vapi's voice AI platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," or "in-app pricing." Distinct from public pricing pages (see page-cro) — this skill focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when architecting new Claude Code agents following Anthropic best practices. Guides through YAML frontmatter creation, agent structure definition, role boundaries, and validation. Critical for creating minimal agent files (~150 lines) with proper skill invocations. Examples: <example>Context: User wants to create a new agent for security auditing user: "Create a security-auditor agent" assistant: "I'll use the agent-creator skill to build this agent following Anthropic best practices" <commentary>New agent creation requires the agent-creator skill to ensure proper structure and YAML frontmatter.</commentary></example> <example>Context: Existing agent file is too verbose and needs refactoring user: "The architect agent is 2000 lines, refactor it to minimal structure" assistant: "I'll use the agent-creator skill to refactor this into a minimal ~150 line agent with a separate skill file" <commentary>Agent refactoring requires the agent-creator skill to separate identity from technical procedures.</commentary></example>

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to run a diffusers pipeline from a terminal (one-off generation, batch jobs, smoke-testing a new model), run on HF Sandbox hardware via `--remote`, introspect a pipeline's input schema before calling it, or attach a LoRA at inference time. Prefer this over writing ad-hoc Python scripts for generation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research an issue deeply and present all context to the user. but the user writes the code. The LLM investigates code paths, finds relevant files, explains patterns, and identifies constraints. The user thinks through the approach and implements it. Use when ready to start working on an issue after oss-prep-to-contribute. Not for writing tests or documentation as a standalone contribution. Use oss-write-tests or oss-write-docs for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, draft, audit, and publish posts for a Facebook Page. Use when the user wants to write a short punchy Page post or a longer story post, remove AI tells from a draft, reverse-engineer the hook from a high-share Page post, draft replies to comments on their Page, or plan a week of Facebook Page content. Page posts publish via the Publora API. User provides notes or a Facebook Page post URL, the skill drafts, the user approves, then it publishes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit any Supabase project for security vulnerabilities, RLS misconfigurations, exposed API keys, auth bypasses, and storage issues. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Supabase security, RLS policies, database security audit, security review, penetration testing a Supabase app, checking if their database is exposed, hardening their Supabase project, fixing RLS, or anything related to securing a Supabase or vibe-coded application. Also trigger when the user asks about securing apps built with Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, or any AI coding tool that uses Supabase as a backend. Even if the user just says 'is my app secure' or 'check my database' and their project uses Supabase, use this skill. (DEPRECATED: this skill is a backwards-compat shim. Prefer the multi-backend `database-sentinel` skill, which covers Supabase plus Firebase, MongoDB, self-hosted Postgres, and self-hosted MySQL.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, draft, audit, and publish posts and threads for Threads (Meta). Use when the user wants to write a single Threads post or a multi-post thread, remove AI tells from a draft, reverse-engineer the hook from a viral Threads post, draft a reply or quote post, or plan a week of Threads content. Posts and threads publish via the Publora API, which auto-splits long content into a connected multi-post thread. User provides notes or a post URL, the skill drafts, the user approves, then it publishes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when real user interviews aren't possible (solo/hobby/dogfood projects) but persona work is still needed. Enforces epistemic discipline: adversarial spectrum, pre-committed stop conditions, speculation tagging. NOT a substitute for /mycelium:user-interview when real users are available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) — test horizontal and vertical privilege escalation across user IDs, org IDs, tenant boundaries, and unguessable identifiers. Use when the user has an API endpoint with an identifier in the path/body that may be tested for unauthorized cross-user access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use near the end of EZ_math_model intake when external/user-corpus contains user-provided papers, notes, PDFs, datasets, or examples that should become a local AGENTS.md reference index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide requirement writing, user story creation, and feature specification. Use when: writing requirements, user stories, issues, feature planning. Keywords: requirement, user story, issue, feature, specification, 需求, 功能規劃, 規格.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve how interfaces use photos, screenshots, icons, illustrations, and user-uploaded media so visuals support clarity instead of undermining it. Use when the user mentions images, screenshots, background photos, hero images, icon sizing, user-uploaded media, crops, overlays, or image readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specifies design and user experience guidelines, including dark mode compatibility, responsive design, performance optimization, modern UI, and accessibility. This rule promotes a user-friendly and vi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build complete userModels for people Claudicle collaborates with. Creates core persona files, social dossiers with voice analysis, content archives, and INDEX registration. Use when asked to create a user model, build a persona, or document someone's voice and identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。