「change」の検索結果

Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement exactly one SDD Composy task in the ready state with dependency preflight, TDD RED evidence, allowed paths, real verification commands, and the guarded transition to qa_required. Use when a ready task should be executed — 'executar a TASK-003', 'implementar a próxima tarefa', 'run task 4'. Do NOT use for changes without an approved task (sdd-quick), for autonomous multi-stage correction (sdd-loop), or for QA, review, or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise the SDD Composy technical specification (tasks/prd-SLUG/techspec.md) from the approved PRD, resolved stories, and mapped codebase, with DEC/RISK and TU/TI/E2E traceability and a human gate. Use when the product contracts are approved and architecture is needed — 'criar a spec técnica', 'techspec do prd-SLUG', 'design the solution for…'. Do NOT use to change product scope, before PRD and stories approval, or for design notes outside SDD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only consolidated snapshot of an SDD Composy workspace: lifecycle stage, task contracts, trace integrity, loops, fleets, and the next action, without changing any file. Use for 'em que pé está o SDD', 'status do fluxo', 'qual a próxima ação', 'where are we in the workflow'. Do NOT use for git, CI, infrastructure, or other plugins' status, or to change state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to evolve the features of a PRD roadmap with user stories — 'refinar as histórias da feature', 'escrever histórias de usuário', 'critérios de aceite', 'regras de negócio da feature', 'deixar a feature pronta', 'user stories for FT01' — one feature at a time, interviewing the human until each story meets the Definition of Ready: persona, value, INVEST, CA (Gherkin, happy and error paths) and RN from the PRD. Do NOT use to create the roadmap (prd-roadmap) or to change requirements without stories (prd-refine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a new Product Requirements Document — 'criar um PRD', 'escrever os requisitos de', 'new PRD for', 'documento de requisitos' — through a 12-step interview, one question at a time, ending with an approval gate. Do NOT use to change an existing PRD (prd- refine) or to plan implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to change an existing PRD — 'refinar o PRD', 'adicionar requisito', 'atualizar escopo do PRD', 'update the PRD' — through targeted questions, bumping the version and re-opening approval. Do NOT use to create a PRD (prd-create).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select traceable regression coverage from change impact, affected risks, criteria, dependencies, and prior defects rather than execution convenience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a full feature action plan (backend + frontend + tests) with the PWDEVIA 7-question method before any code is written — 'planejar a feature X', 'criar plano de feature', 'plan the user CRUD'. Interviews the human (max 2 rounds) and writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use to write code (feat-exec), for small 1–3 file changes (feat-quick), backend-only or UI-only scope (feat-backend / feat-frontend), tests for existing code (feat-test) or code review (feat-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a code review of an explicit range or set of files — correctness, security, performance, conventions, tests — with stable findings (CR-nnn, BLOCKER..INFO) and rule citations — 'revisar os últimos commits', 'code review da feature X', 'review base..HEAD'. Plans a REPORT-mode review (no code changes, no commit). Do NOT use to fix code (feat-feature / feat-quick), to write tests (feat-test) or for UI/UX design critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inventory, archive, and summarize PWDEV Flow project history safely. Use when the user asks to find stale artifacts, archive completed work, clean the Flow workspace without deletion, or generate a changelog from verified history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the work is functionally complete and needs finishing touches—not when the hierarchy, structure, tone, or technical foundation still need major changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt designs for narrow, medium, wide, embedded, or print web contexts without losing usability, hierarchy, or target sizing. Use when the user mentions responsive design, breakpoints, narrow layouts, viewport changes, coarse-pointer browsers, or cross-context adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare or update a Fabric pull request by proving the changeset-or-skip decision, validation evidence, DCO sign-off, and public-safe PR metadata. Use before the first push, after later revisions, or when asked to create or update a PR. Do not use to review an unrelated PR or authorize relay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement real-time features using Convex reactive queries that automatically update when data changes, enabling live collaboration, instant updates, and reactive UIs without manual polling. Use when building live dashboards, implementing collaborative editing, creating chat applications, showing real-time notifications, building activity feeds, implementing presence indicators, creating reactive search, or any feature requiring instant data synchronization across clients.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive technical documentation including API docs, component libraries, README files, architecture diagrams, and developer guides using tools like JSDoc, Storybook, or Docusaurus. Use when documenting APIs, creating component documentation, writing README files, generating API references, documenting architecture decisions, creating onboarding guides, maintaining changelogs, documenting configuration options, or building developer documentation sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply continuous improvement principles to iteratively enhance processes, code quality, team practices, and system performance through small, incremental changes. Use when improving development processes, optimizing workflows, reducing waste, enhancing code quality over time, implementing retrospective learnings, or fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," or "how long should I run this test." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better. For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking. For page-level conversion optimization, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR. Use when asked to "ship", "deploy", "push to main", "create a PR", "merge and push", or "get it deployed". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT push/PR directly) when the user says code is ready, asks about deploying, wants to push code up, or asks to create a PR. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", or "check my diff". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "bug report", "just check for bugs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restrict file edits to a specific directory for the session. Blocks Edit and Write outside the allowed path. Use when debugging to prevent accidentally "fixing" unrelated code, or when you want to scope changes to one module. Use when asked to "freeze", "restrict edits", "only edit this folder", or "lock down edits". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。