9,172 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete launch readiness validation covering every department: code, content, store, marketing, community, infrastructure, legal, and go/no-go sign-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity level design-to-code translation. Trigger & event architecture, encounter design contracts, checkpoint & respawn, cinematic & scripted sequences, environmental storytelling hooks, level streaming & loading seams. DESIGN INTENT format: INTENT/WRONG/RIGHT/SCAFFOLD/ DESIGN HOOK. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity NavMesh pathfinding patterns, safety checks, and performance optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于运行现有项目验证命令并修复代码变更后的失败，包括 lint、type-check、单元/集成测试、build、CI 或本地脚本失败。不要用于设计或编写新的组件/E2E 测试；中文触发词包括 验证、检查失败、修复失败、CI 失败。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于安全移除前端死代码、未使用导出、陈旧组件、废弃路由、未使用依赖，或由 knip、depcheck、ts-prune、TypeScript、ESLint、人工审查发现的清理目标。不要用于会改变行为的功能重写；中文触发词包括 死代码、清理未使用、refactor clean、依赖清理、删除无用代码。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于审查或改进前端无障碍、语义结构、键盘支持、焦点管理、ARIA 标签、屏幕阅读器行为、WCAG 2.2 问题、触控无障碍或辅助技术回归；中文触发词包括 无障碍、accessibility、a11y、WCAG、屏幕阅读器。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when diagnosing structural maintainability problems in existing frontend code before deciding how to refactor it, especially when evidence, false-positive checks, and candidate transformations are needed without editing business code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or improving frontend accessibility, semantic structure, keyboard support, focus management, ARIA labels, screen reader behavior, WCAG 2.2 issues, touch accessibility, or assistive-technology regressions; Chinese triggers include accessibility, accessibility, a11y, WCAG, screen reader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up or reviewing Storybook component documentation, design-system presentation, isolated component state previews, stories, addons, decorators, MDX docs, component-state interaction checks, visual baselines, or Chromatic. For real-browser cross-page journeys or broader coverage planning, choose the matching testing workflow first; Chinese triggers include Storybook, component documentation, Design System, visual regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing frontend security risks such as XSS, CSRF, sensitive data exposure, unsafe DOM APIs, untrusted user input, authentication/token handling, payment flows, file upload, CSP, dependency risk, or third-party scripts; Chinese triggers include security review, security check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when safely removing dead frontend code, unused exports, stale components, obsolete routes, unused dependencies, or cleanup targets found by tools such as knip, depcheck, ts-prune, TypeScript, ESLint, or manual review. Do not use for feature rewrites that change behavior; Chinese triggers include dead code, clean up unused, refactor clean, dependency cleanup, delete useless code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Connect and operate the Loophole Bridge (Ableton Live MCP server). Use when the user wants to check Live/bridge prerequisites, wire an MCP client to Loophole, or run a Live editing recipe (humanize, build arrangement, batch rename, chord from prompt). Triggers: "is my Ableton bridge working", "set up loophole", "connect Claude to Ableton", "/doctor", "/setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish crates to crates.io with pre-flight checks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Push a branch and open a PR with pre-flight checks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate tests from Allium specifications. Use when the user wants to propagate tests, generate test files from a spec, write tests for a specification, create property-based tests, produce state machine tests, check test coverage against spec obligations, or understand what tests a specification requires.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weed the Allium garden. Find where Allium specifications and implementation code have diverged, and help resolve the divergences. Use when the user wants to check spec-code alignment, compare specs against implementation, audit for spec drift or violations, sync specs with code or code with specs, or verify whether the implementation matches what the spec says.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use OpenClaw Manager (OCM) safely and correctly for OpenClaw environment lifecycle work, runtime installation/builds, release-shaped local builds, upgrades, migration/adoption, cloning existing user state, service supervision, gateway logs, dev worktrees, plugin testing, model/provider smoke tests, TUI/dashboard checks, cleanup, and concise reporting. Use whenever Codex is asked to use OCM, manage OpenClaw envs/runtimes/services, test OpenClaw with OCM, reproduce existing-user or new-user flows, or avoid breaking user state while working with OpenClaw.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologist/Technician — bench-testing a prototype board against a power or timing spec, isolating a resistive fault in a power path with node-to-node voltage-drop measurements, checking whether an oscilloscope's own bandwidth is limiting a rise-time measurement before trusting it, running a power-supply load-regulation sweep, or evaluating ESD-event provenance and IPC-A-610 acceptance on a returned unit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrician — sizing a service panel upgrade with an NEC load calculation, troubleshooting a tripping breaker or dead circuit systematically, checking wire gauge/ampacity and voltage drop for a circuit run, resolving a code-vs-inspector interpretation dispute, or deciding when a job (aluminum wiring, knob-and-tube, undersized service) exceeds the immediate scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Science Professor — deciding whether a field exercise crosses a weather/safety cancel threshold, building an NSF/EPA proposal budget, normalizing an interdisciplinary tenure case against the right benchmark, checking whether a mixed-methods field project needs IRB review, or handling a politically charged classroom topic without losing academic-freedom footing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental engineer — designing or sizing a wastewater/water treatment process, drafting or reviewing an NPDES or Title V air permit application, scoping a contaminated-site remediation (RI/FS), evaluating whether a process change triggers a permit modification, or checking a discharge/emissions dataset against regulatory limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。