6,320 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Determines when to pursue genetic testing for glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism (FH-I/GRA) in patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism (PA). Indicated when PA onset is before age 20 or there is a family history of PA or stroke before age 40.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends administering stress-dose glucocorticoids before surgery and tapering after surgery in patients with adrenal insufficiency before repeat testing. Triggers include preoperative planning for surgery in a patient with known or suspected adrenal insufficiency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a pre-mortem, or before committing to a plan, launch or migration: "what could go wrong?", "stress test this plan", "how might this fail?", "risks before we ship". Assumes failure, lists causes, ranks them and sets mitigations. Skip for explaining a failure that already happened.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates a plan before committing to it - checks whether the ranking survives the assumptions, finds the most likely way it fails, and makes the trade-offs explicit via a Pareto frontier instead of an invented single score. Use before a launch, price change, migration, infrastructure change or major commitment, when running a premortem, when two objectives conflict, or when a decision depends on an assumption nobody has tested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure real frontend performance — Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, INP), page-load traces, CPU and network throttling, Lighthouse accessibility/SEO scores, and heap growth — using chrome-devtools-mcp against a live browser. Trigger when asked "is the page fast enough", "measure Core Web Vitals", "why is this route slow", "run Lighthouse", "check for a memory leak", before any performance-gated certification (Built for Shopify, Core Web Vitals thresholds, store listing review), and before any launch or traffic-multiplier event. Measurement only — this skill never drives functional journeys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review gate for correctness, reuse, and simplification. Produces a structured verdict with actionable findings. Trigger on any PR before merge, or on any agent-generated code before it is committed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go / no-go gate before any deployment. Checks failure modes, rollback plan, cost, production bar, and definition of done. Trigger before releasing to any environment that carries real consequences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Paste a URL/snippet before you borrow it — detects its license, runs the derived compatibility policy, and drafts a provenance ledger entry — even before any code is written, not after
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill before implementing a fix for a barrier that may originate in a shared component, design system, renderer, or external dependency rather than this project's own code. Decide whether the responsible fix is local, an existing installed capability, or an upstream contribution before writing a workaround. Absolutely always record any temporary local divergence with an owner and removal condition. Under no circumstances open, comment on, or submit anything in an external project without explicit human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use to validate a spec artifact's decisions with the user across three contexts — a freshly-authored Feature Spec (idea-to-spec), an existing canonical spec before PBI decomposition (spec-to-pbi), or a refined idea + §8 test-specs (idea-to-pbi deep mode). Detects the context, walks every applicable validation category, and runs an exhaustive but budget-bounded blocking clarification gate so every non-obvious or conflicting decision is confirmed before the artifact drives downstream work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships. Use when output must clear two independent adversarial reviewers before it ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a bug or regression is reported, the FIRST step — before fixing — is to research how and when it was introduced (git archaeology), then record that finding on the tracking issue/PR. Use the moment a bug, error, broken build, or "this used to work" is reported, before writing a fix. Produces a first-bad-commit (or "not a code regression") note you paste onto the issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a crouton collection schema (the field-definition JSON) into a human-readable field table + relationships sketch (HTML + PNG + a terse Markdown table), so a human can sign off on the DATA MODEL before any code is generated. Use when an agent drafts or changes a collection schema (before `crouton config` / `generate_collection`), or when asked to "review a schema", "show the data model", "check these fields".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。