「benchmark」の検索結果

Infer orthologous genes and gene families across species using OrthoFinder3 (HOG-based phylogenetic orthology), SonicParanoid2, Broccoli, ProteinOrtho, OMA / FastOMA hierarchical orthologous groups, eggNOG-mapper, JustOrthologs, and TOGA whole-genome-alignment orthology. Use when building single-copy ortholog sets for phylogenomics, classifying co-orthologs and in/out-paralogs after gene duplication, propagating functional annotation via orthology with awareness of the ortholog conjecture, distinguishing speciation from duplication via gene-tree species-tree reconciliation, computing Quest-for-Orthologs benchmark performance, or running synteny-aware ortholog detection in WGD-affected lineages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Hanna 2021 ClinVar-scale CBE screen benchmarked on BRCA1/2, Cuella-Martin 2021 DDR saturation), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end; 4-7 for ABE7.10), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CUT&RUN (Skene Henikoff 2017) and CUT&Tag (Kaya-Okur 2019) chromatin profiling data. Handles SEACR vs MACS2 peak calling (with the btaf375 2025 benchmark guidance), pA-MNase vs pA-Tn5 vs pAG-Tn5 chimera differences, E. coli spike-in carryover normalization, IgG-only control logic (no input), characteristic fragment-size signatures (25-75 bp for CUT&Tag), and lower depth requirements (5M reads typical vs 25M for ChIP). Use when calling peaks from CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag, scaling by E. coli spike-in carryover, choosing SEACR norm mode, or comparing CUT&RUN/Tag results to traditional ChIP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated compliance checking against CIS, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 benchmarks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Holistic evaluation framework for language models measuring accuracy, calibration, robustness, and fairness

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive reference for inter-process communication mechanisms -- every way processes can talk on a computer. Covers sockets (TCP, UDP, Unix domain), WebSockets, SSE, pipes (named/anonymous), shared memory (mmap, shm_open), message queues, signals, D-Bus, XPC (macOS), gRPC, REST, stdin/stdout, file-based coordination, and clipboard. Performance benchmarks, platform availability, and code examples for each. Special focus on which IPC works best for AI agent coordination. Activate on: "IPC", "inter-process communication", "process communication", "how do I talk between processes", "Unix socket vs TCP", "shared memory", "named pipe", "WebSocket vs SSE", "gRPC vs REST", "agent coordination IPC", "XPC service", "message passing", "stdout pipe", "D-Bus", "mmap". NOT for: distributed systems design (use distributed-systems), network protocol design (use networking), message queue infrastructure like Kafka (use data-pipeline-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lm-eval-harness: benchmark LLMs (MMLU, GSM8K, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and compare how competing products implement a similar feature at the UX and interaction level. Provides structured comparison tables and strategic differentiation recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kova/OpenClaw validation: benchmarks, release gates, scenarios, perf reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Lingzao creator-content tools for Xiaohongshu/XHS, Douyin, and WeChat official-account public content. Lingzao supports XHS SEO, Xiaohongshu account analysis, benchmark account discovery, viral note breakdown, keyword research, one-stop content packages from keyword/link/image/inspiration material, title and cover optimization, hand-drawn route-map cards, city food maps, travel itinerary maps, life checklist maps, workflow manual maps, creator content workflow, note search, creator search, profile lookup, recent posts, deep profile copy/subtitle analysis, note/article detail, post comments, article stats, related articles, short-video copy extraction, and prompt-based creator image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add tree-sitter language support to codegraph end-to-end — wire the grammar + extractor, write tests, then benchmark extraction quality and retrieval value on 3 popular real-world repos. Use when the user runs /add-lang <language> or asks to add/support a new language (e.g. Lua, Elixir, Zig, OCaml) in codegraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start 用户没自己历史时全靠对标，发过历史的用户也建议至少 1 个对标做 sanity check。触发词："学这个账号"/"拆这几个对标视频"/"learn from"/"导入对标账号"/"找对标"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated compliance checking against CIS, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 benchmarks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WAF (ModSecurity/AWS WAF/Cloudflare) logs to detect SQL injection attack campaigns. Parses ModSecurity audit logs and JSON WAF event logs to identify SQLi patterns (UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, SLEEP(), BENCHMARK()), tracks attack sources, correlates multi-stage injection attempts, and generates incident reports with OWASP classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-language test infrastructure for the Pump SDK — Rust unit/integration/security/performance tests, TypeScript Jest tests, Python fuzz tests, shell test orchestration, Criterion benchmarks, and CI quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade multi-threaded Rust vanity address generator for Solana — 100K+ keys/sec using Rayon parallel iterators with solana-sdk, Base58 pattern matching, prefix/suffix support, security-hardened file output, and Criterion benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge performance or resource claims on real hardware: benchmark design or review, latency, throughput, memory or headroom numbers, and accept-or-reject decisions on optimizations. Not for refactors with no resource claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export Codex rollout/session JSONL as a self-contained HTML report that can be opened offline. Use when a user provides a complete session file path or Codex session ID, or asks to export a Codex session to HTML, generate a session report, or convert a rollout to HTML. Supports exact full-ID lookup in the CODEX_HOME sessions and archived_sessions directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。