「cis」の検索結果

Convert SVG files to high-quality PNG images with precise control over dimensions, background color, and CSS rendering (including mix-blend-mode, filters, gradients). Use this skill when the user wants to: (1) convert SVG to PNG, (2) generate app icons or splash screens from SVG source, (3) batch-generate multiple PNG sizes from a single SVG, (4) render SVG with advanced CSS features like mix-blend-mode or filters to PNG. Triggers: "SVG to PNG", "SVG変換", "PNG変換", "アイコン生成", "スプラッシュ生成", "app icon from SVG", "favicon generation", "splash screen generation".

Fit cognitive drift-diffusion models (Ratcliff DDM) to reaction time and accuracy data with parameter estimation (drift rate, boundary separation, non-decision time), model comparison, and parameter recovery validation. Use when modeling binary decision-making with reaction time data, estimating cognitive parameters from experimental data, comparing sequential sampling model variants, or decomposing speed-accuracy tradeoff effects into latent cognitive components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to record why one world won over the others, as a decision-diary entry. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a repository decision needs an interview plus durable terminology and decision records. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a current decision needs pressure-testing until the rationale is clear to a skeptic. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize ChatGPT Voice in the Codex desktop app into an ear-first control plane for free-form task coordination and opt-in workflows. Apply spoken synthesis, routing-only coordination, owning-task role contracts, project placement, explicit authority, safe speech, current-state verification, honest recovery, and the optional Slopware Dev Stack: MSL, MSW, CODER Loop, and Timebox. Load named workflows only when invoked: Freeway for parallel lanes, Decision Walkthrough for read-only authority convergence, and Tutorial for teaching-first onboarding. Use when the user invokes the voice optimizer, coordinates Codex work through voice, assigns the current voice task as coordinator, runs Freeway, starts a decision walkthrough, learns voice orchestration, routes development through CODER, authorizes Timebox, or asks CVO to install or use Slopware companions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a design decision with premortem/backcast analysis, then produce a risk-calibrated recommendation that maps to ADR fields. Use when: (1) Multiple competing architecture options, (2) Irreversible or high-risk design choices, (3) /discuss identifies a complex trade-off

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit a complete, concise, UI-ready website page content framework from verified business facts before visual design. Use to define page goals, customer decision flow, section order, realistic draft copy, content and evidence needs, CTAs, or page-family rules; do not use for visual design, HTML, SEO implementation, or platform code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户在面临投资/创业/职业选择，群体都在做一个方向但自己有疑虑、或在问"什么时候应该反着来""如何做出不同于大多数人的正确决策""共识什么时候是错的""怎么承受被误解的压力"时激活。 核心信号：用户在做一个与群体共识相反的决策，或者在考虑这样做。 不适用于：技术性问题、纯情感问题、不需要逆群体方向的常规决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against the project's language and documented decisions. Run BEFORE /claude-setup:build on non-trivial features in repos that have (or should have) a CONTEXT.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against the project's language and documented decisions. Run BEFORE /build on non-trivial features in repos that have (or should have) a CONTEXT.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end meeting workflow skill. Pre-meeting: research attendees, build agenda, prepare talking points, create pre-read. Post-meeting: process notes into action items, draft follow-up emails, log decisions, update project notes. Useful for preparing for important calls, during post-meeting processing, when following up with attendees, and for building a running decision log. Use when the user says "prepare for meeting", "meeting prep", "process meeting notes", "meeting follow up", "meeting machine", or "prep for my call".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a dogfooding session for hyalo — build from source, exercise the CLI against real knowledgebases (own KB, MDN, GitHub Docs, VS Code docs), find bugs, verify recent fixes, assess UX, measure performance, and write a structured report. Use this skill whenever the user says /dogfood, "dogfood", "run a dogfood session", "test hyalo against real data", or wants to exercise hyalo on real knowledgebases to find issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Server management principles and decision-making. Process management, monitoring strategy, and scaling decisions. Teaches thinking, not commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when important product, technical, or founder decisions need to be captured as durable context with rationale, tradeoffs, and follow-up implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply pecking order theory (Myers and Majluf, 1984) to analyze how information asymmetry drives financing hierarchy decisions. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why firms prefer internal over external financing, interpret equity issuance as a negative signal, evaluate capital raising decisions, or when they ask 'why did the stock drop on the equity offering', 'should we use debt or equity', or 'why do firms hoard cash'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply dual-process theory to diagnose whether judgments arise from fast intuitive (System 1) or slow analytical (System 2) processing and identify resulting cognitive biases. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why quick decisions go wrong, design choice architectures that account for cognitive defaults, audit decision processes for heuristic errors, or when they ask 'why do people misjudge probability', 'how to reduce snap-judgment errors', or 'when does intuition fail'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply governance theory to analyze multi-level, network, and collaborative governance arrangements beyond traditional government. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate public-private partnerships, analyze multi-stakeholder governance structures, compare governance models across sectors, or assess institutional arrangements for collective decision-making — even if they say 'who governs this', 'public-private collaboration', or 'how are decisions made across organizations'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。