「client」の検索結果

Configure AppFolio Stack API authentication with OAuth 2.0. Use when setting up property management API access, registering as an AppFolio Stack partner, or configuring client credentials for API calls. Trigger: "install appfolio", "setup appfolio", "appfolio auth", "appfolio API key".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and configure Apollo.io API authentication. Use when setting up a new Apollo integration, configuring API keys, or initializing Apollo client in your project. Trigger with phrases like "install apollo", "setup apollo api", "apollo authentication", "configure apollo api key".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run your first Apify Actor and retrieve results via apify-client. Use when starting a new Apify integration, testing connectivity, or learning the Actor call/dataset retrieval pattern. Trigger with "apify hello world", "apify example", "run an apify actor", "apify quick start", "first apify scrape".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade Apify SDK, apify-client, and Crawlee versions safely. Use when migrating between SDK versions, handling breaking changes, or updating from Apify SDK v2 to v3 (Crawlee split). Trigger with "upgrade apify", "apify migration", "apify breaking changes", "update apify SDK", "crawlee upgrade", "apify v2 to v3".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle Apify API rate limits with proper backoff and request queuing. Use when hitting 429 errors, optimizing API request throughput, or implementing rate-aware client wrappers. Trigger with "apify rate limit", "apify throttling", "apify 429", "apify retry", "apify backoff", "too many requests apify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply production-ready patterns for the Anima SDK design-to-code pipeline. Use when building reusable Anima client wrappers, implementing output caching, or establishing team standards for design-to-code automation. Trigger with: "anima SDK patterns", "anima best practices", "anima code patterns".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a minimal Algolia JavaScript v5 indexing and search proof using a disposable index. Use when verifying credentials, learning the client boundary, or proving first connectivity. Trigger with "Algolia hello world", "first Algolia search", or "test Algolia setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or review a single-index Algolia search contract with filters, facets, pagination, and highlighting. Use when building product or content search against the JavaScript v5 client. Trigger with "Algolia search workflow", "add facets", or "searchSingleIndex".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a fast local development loop for Algolia record transforms and search behavior without contaminating shared indices. Use when iterating on search code, fixtures, or client wrappers. Trigger with "Algolia local development", "mock Algolia", or "test search locally".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate archived Alchemy JavaScript SDK integrations to current capability-specific clients with parity, canary, and rollback evidence. Use when removing alchemy-sdk or upgrading Wallet APIs. Trigger with "migrate alchemy-sdk", "replace alchemy-web3", or "upgrade Wallet APIs to v5".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and prove the current Alchemy client, key type, network, and authentication boundary before integration work. Use when creating or repairing Alchemy connectivity. Trigger with "set up Alchemy", "configure an Alchemy API key", or "choose viem or Wallet APIs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor and optimize Algolia request pressure using observed responses and bounded client behavior. Use when requests return 429, queues grow, or search and indexing compete for capacity. Trigger with "Algolia rate limit", "Algolia 429", or "throttle indexing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create narrow, version-pinned Adobe SDK and REST adapters with typed contracts, redaction, bounded polling, and compatibility evidence. Use when writing or upgrading integration code. Trigger with "Adobe SDK patterns", "wrap Adobe API", or "review Adobe client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for ingesting the latest OpenAI TypeSpec specification into the openai-dotnet SDK. Use this when asked to update or ingest OpenAI API specs, copy base TypeSpec files from upstream, fix client TSP compile errors, or run code generation for new API areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate OpenEnv environments from a concrete use case (for example, "generate an env for the library textarena"). Use when asked to design or implement a new environment under envs/ by researching a target library/API, selecting matching OpenEnv examples, asking key implementation questions, and building models/client/server/openenv.yaml. Do not use for model training or evaluation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work on Grida account and billing client adapters, credit display, Console handoffs and native execution receipts. Excludes financial policy and provider operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP request smuggling and desynchronization testing. Use when front proxies, CDNs, or load balancers disagree with the origin on message framing (Content-Length vs Transfer-Encoding), on HTTP/2→HTTP/1 translation, or when exploring client-side desync via browser fetch pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced prototype pollution playbook — server-side RCE, client-side gadgets, filter bypasses, and detection techniques. Companion to ../prototype-pollution/ for basics. Use when you've confirmed pollution and need to escalate to code execution or find framework-specific gadgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNS rebinding attack playbook. Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attacker-controlled domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Java "Ghost Bits" / Cast Attack playbook (Black Hat Asia 2026). Use when attacking Java services where 16-bit char is silently narrowed to 8-bit byte to bypass WAF/IDS for SQL injection, deserialization RCE, file upload (Webshell), path traversal, CRLF injection, request smuggling, and SMTP injection. Affects Tomcat, Spring, Jetty, Undertow, Vert.x, Jackson, Fastjson, Apache Commons BCEL, Apache HttpClient, Angus Mail, JDK HttpServer, Lettuce, Jodd, XMLWriter and re-enables many "patched" CVEs through WAF bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure writing-style statistics (sentence length, vocabulary, transitions, phrasing) from 5 to 10 posts you or your client wrote, and produce a voice profile for VOICE.md, blog-persona, and blog-write. Use for "learn my style", "build a writing baseline". It describes style; it does not detect or attribute authorship, and it is not for scoring a post (blog-analyze) or writing brand rules (blog-brand).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。