5,930 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use AB Method when a Claude Code task is too large for one pass and needs to be broken into focused tasks and missions that are completed incrementally instead of trying to solve the whole project in one conversation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the theories/methodologies a project claims to implement are faithfully operationalized — or name-dropped, partially built, distorted, or over-claimed. Source-grounds the load-bearing theories; tags the rest provisional. Run periodically alongside /framework-health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asking whether something in imp is actually finished - hunting stubs, placeholders, request fields that are parsed and then ignored, code paths or kernels that never run, gate-based features that silently no-op, tests that assert nothing. Triggers on "is this implemented", "unfinished", "stub", "placeholder", "dead path", "does this flag do anything", "accepted but ignored", "kernel never launched", "test asserts nothing", "neutral A/B on a gated feature". Do NOT use for structural debt / god files / duplication (codebase-audit) or for who-calls-what (code-graph).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a question is about *structure* rather than text - who calls or launches a symbol, where it is defined, what a change would reach, whether something is dead, how a request gets from the API to a kernel. Triggers on "who calls", "who launches this kernel", "where is X defined", "what breaks if I change", "is this still used", "is this dead", "trace the path from X to Y", "blast radius", "what depends on this header". Do NOT use for free-text search (`rg` is better and cheaper) or to open a file whose path you already know.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates rating agency methodology application with loss model inputs, correlation assumptions, and tranche-level credit assessment. Use when analyzing structured product ratings, comparing agency methodologies, or assessing rating sensitivity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares credit rating agency presentations with methodology alignment, peer positioning, and target rating analysis. Use when advising on credit ratings, preparing rating agency meetings, or analyzing rating methodology impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimental_log.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges everything into the template that already contains Intro + Related Work from Step 3. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 4 or when the user asks to "write the methodology and experiments sections" or "fill in the rest of the paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure SDLC team formation and SDLC method for this project. Asks the four-option SDLC method question (solo / single-team / programme / assured), then recommends and installs team plugins based on project type, language, tech stack, and support needs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze credential-free public website monitoring evidence from server access logs, HTTP fetches, robots/llms/sitemap checks, and exported summaries while protecting raw IP and private query data. Use this skill when the user asks whether crawlers or AI bots reached a site, whether public SEO/LLM discovery files respond, or how to separate observed facts from unknown Search Console, rank, analytics, or citation claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebalances context across Memory, Custom Instructions, knowledge files, and User Preferences in Claude Projects. Audits Memory for redundancy, staleness, and misplacement; prescribes optimization including Codification of stable Memory patterns into explicit User Preferences or Project CI rules. Use when user says "optimize my memory," "what should be in my memory," "trim my knowledge files," "reduce my context usage," "rebalance my project," "what should be in my preferences vs memory," or asks whether something belongs in Memory, a knowledge file, or User Preferences. Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project feels bloated," "Claude keeps forgetting things," "my context window keeps hitting limits." Activate whenever Memory-layer balance is the primary concern. Do NOT use for full Project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or global-layer audits that don't touch Project Memory (use rootnode-global-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Purify water from wild sources using boiling, filtration, and chemical methods. Covers source assessment and priority ranking, sediment pre-filtering, method selection (boiling, chemical, UV, filter), altitude-adjusted boiling procedure, chemical treatment dosages, and safe storage practices. Use when needing drinking water in a wilderness setting, when available water sources are of unknown quality, in an emergency survival situation where dehydration is a risk, or when making water safe for cooking or wound cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redact reverse-engineering findings for public disclosure while preserving methodology, generalizable patterns, and teaching value. Covers the private-vs-public repo split, deny-list pattern maintenance, orphan-commit publish pattern that prevents `git log` leaks, category-based redaction calibration (methodology/pattern/version-finding/internal), and the `check-redaction.sh`-style CI gate that blocks merges when a deny-listed pattern appears. Use when publishing findings about a CLI harness you don't own, when preparing upstream proposals to an unrelated project, or when archiving a private research repo for public reference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Field identification of minerals and ores using hardness, streak, luster, cleavage, crystal habit, and simple chemical tests. Covers the systematic elimination methodology, Mohs scale application, and common ore indicators for precious metals, gemstones, and industrial minerals. Use when encountering an unknown rock or mineral specimen, when prospecting and assessing whether a site shows valuable mineral indicators, when distinguishing ore-bearing rock from barren rock in the field, or when building geological literacy through systematic observation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare herbal remedies from Hildegard von Bingen's Physica. Covers plant identification, preparation methods (tinctures, poultices, infusions, decoctions), dosage guidance, contraindications, and safety review based on 12th-century medieval pharmacopeia. Use when needing an herbal remedy for a specific ailment using Hildegardian pharmacopeia, seeking guidance on preparation methods and dosage, researching medieval herbal medicine, or integrating Hildegard's plant wisdom into holistic health practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formulate a quantum mechanics or quantum chemistry problem with proper mathematical framework including Hilbert space, operators, boundary conditions, and approximation method selection. Use when setting up a quantum mechanics problem for analytic or numerical solution, formulating a quantum chemistry calculation, translating a physical scenario into the Schrodinger or Dirac formalism, or choosing between perturbation theory, variational methods, DFT, and exact diagonalization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and safely gather edible and useful wild plants. Covers safety rules and deadly plant recognition, habitat reading, multi-feature identification methodology, the universal edibility test, sustainable harvesting practices, preparation methods, reaction monitoring, and building knowledge with beginner-friendly universal species. Use when supplementing food supply in a wilderness or survival setting, needing medicinal or utility plants, identifying plants around camp for safety, or in long-term scenarios where foraging extends available rations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Prometheus Alertmanager with routing trees, receivers (Slack, PagerDuty, email), inhibition rules, silences, and notification templates for actionable incident alerting. Use when implementing proactive monitoring with automated incident detection, routing alerts to the appropriate team by severity, reducing alert fatigue through grouping and deduplication, integrating with on-call systems like PagerDuty, or migrating from legacy alerting to Prometheus-based alerting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a new R package with complete structure including DESCRIPTION, NAMESPACE, testthat, roxygen2, renv, Git, GitHub Actions CI, and development configuration files (.Rprofile, .Renviron.example, CLAUDE.md). Follows usethis conventions and tidyverse style. Use when starting a new R package from scratch, converting loose R scripts into a structured package, or setting up a package skeleton for collaborative development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and deploy a pkgdown documentation site for an R package to GitHub Pages. Covers _pkgdown.yml configuration, theming, article organization, reference index customization, and deployment methods. Use when creating a documentation site for a new or existing package, customizing layout or navigation, fixing 404 errors on a deployed site, or migrating between branch-based and GitHub Actions deployment methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze prime numbers using primality tests, factorization algorithms, prime distribution analysis, and sieve methods. Covers trial division, Miller-Rabin, Sieve of Eratosthenes, and the Prime Number Theorem. Use when determining whether an integer is prime or composite, finding prime factorizations, counting or listing primes up to a bound, or investigating prime properties within a number-theoretic proof or computation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。