「every」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a launch retro / post-mortem", "compare launch results vs targets by channel", or "decide what to keep or kill for the next launch"; produces a structured D1/W1/M1 retrospective — a per-channel actual-vs-target table (UTM-attributed own analytics as the truth column, platform self-reported numbers as reference, every figure labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated), a 5-Whys chain on the single largest miss, keep / kill / change decisions per channel, 3-5 actionable learnings for the next launch, and an outcome snapshot submitted to the launch registry. Not for return math (CPA / ROI) — use roi-calculator; not for the stakeholder-facing report writeup — use report-generator; not for a metric deep-dive — use performance-analyzer. 发布复盘/渠道归因/5-Whys/keep-kill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "check our positioning against what we can actually ship", "trace which differentiators we can defend", or "reconcile the positioning canvas with the claims ledger"; reconciles the reused positioning canvas against the shippable stage and the claims ledger to produce a differentiation truth set — every differentiating claim verifiable or marked '[needs source]' — that TALE-T1 is judged against. Not for building the canvas — use positioning-mapper; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for authoring the message house — use message-system-architect. 定位真相/差异化校准/可交付现实/主张核对

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build battle cards", "prep the sales team for launch", or "write the internal launch FAQ"; produces the internal enablement kit for a sales-led launch — battle cards vs each named alternative (where we win / where they win / trap questions, every fact traceable), a sales talk track derived from the PR-FAQ spine, an objection-handling table (objection → response → evidence), internal FAQ + CS macros, and an internal launch announcement with embargo discipline. Not for the external message house — use message-house-builder; not for competitor tracking itself — use competitor-tracker or competitor-analysis; not for outbound sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 销售赋能/battle card/销售叙事/异议处理/内部FAQ

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "measure how our narrative is landing", "track echo rate against our canon lexicon", or "check how AI answer engines describe our brand"; produces a resonance report — echo rate (overlap of market language with the narrative-registry canon lexicon, method declared), AI-answer perception via tavily.py --answer (proxy-labeled), share-of-voice on a locked competitor panel (reusing share-of-voice-tracker), and resonance signals from bluesky.py / gdelt.py / pageviews.py — every number labeled Measured / proxy / User-provided, feeding the TALE E dimension and the upstream of the E1 evidence-integrity veto. Not for rebuilding share-of-voice machinery — use share-of-voice-tracker; not for own-site GA4/GSC analytics — use performance-monitor; not for scoring TALE profile result — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry. 回声率/AI回答感知/份额之声/共鸣信号

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "author our durable brand message hierarchy", "build the brand message house that seeds the canon", or "define the main narrative, three pillars, and tagline for the whole brand"; produces the DURABLE brand message system — main narrative, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]'), and the tagline/one-liner — that seeds the narrative-registry canon and from which every per-launch house derives. Not for a single launch's message house or PR-FAQ — use message-house-builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry; not for the change-narrative arc itself — use strategic-narrative-designer. 品牌消息屋/主叙事/三支柱/标语/持久叙事 canon

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design our change narrative", "build the old-world-to-new-game story arc", or "frame the shift our category is undergoing"; produces a Raskin-style strategic narrative arc — old world → the undeniable shift → winners vs losers under the new rules → the promised land → proof the promised land is real — derived from the positioning truth set and the belief/objection map, feeding the TALE Architecture arc sub-item. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source] and this skill never adjudicates a claim. Not for the message house hierarchy — use message-system-architect; not for the pitch deck narrative — use pitch-narrative-builder; not for claim substantiation — use offer-claims-registry. 变革叙事弧/旧世界/应许之地/战略叙事结构

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "codify our brand voice", "define naming rules for our products and tiers", or "write the tone-of-voice guide with banned phrases"; produces the brand-level voice canon (register, tone spectrum, banned-phrase list, few-shot examples drawn only from the brand's own published material) and the naming tax (product / feature / tier naming rules plus approved and banned terms) that seeds the narrative-registry canon and that every channel's voice adaptation points up to. Not for per-platform voice adaptation — use channel-registry's voice-dossier; not for finished copy or blog posts — use content-writer; not for the message hierarchy itself — use message-system-architect; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品牌语气/词汇表/命名税/禁用词/品牌语言规范

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a story bank", "collect our origin and customer stories", or "assemble reusable proof stories for the message"; assembles reusable narrative units — origin, founder, customer, transformation, and proof stories — each tagged to a claims-ledger ID and a message-house pillar, with every proof labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]. Not for authoring the message house or pillars — use message-system-architect; not for brand voice or naming rules — use brand-language-codifier; not for finished long-form prose — use content-writer; not for adjudicating whether a proof is true — use offer-claims-registry. 品牌故事库/起源客户转化/证据故事单元

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an early access program", "set up a waitlist and beta stages", or "define beta graduation criteria"; produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder with per-stage purpose and opt-in semantics, quantified graduation criteria per stage (labeled Estimated), a cohort-gating and invite-throttling plan, tester recruitment with launch-day social-proof prep, a feedback-loop spec where every status change notifies its subscribers, and a referral-loop mechanism spec (invite codes, anti-abuse). Not for waitlist acquisition strategy or the capture-flow spec — use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry. waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "make everyone tell the same story", "write our elevator pitch ladder", or "build a spokesperson Q&A and approved boilerplate pack"; derives from the narrative-registry canon, message house, and brand voice a repeatable enablement kit — an elevator ladder (10-second / 30-second / 2-minute), a spokesperson Q&A (tough questions with on-canon answers), an approved boilerplate/bio pack (25 / 50 / 100-word), and a do/don't language sheet — so sales, support, founders, and partners repeat one consistent story. Not for the launch-day runbook — use launch-day-conductor; not for finished per-channel copy — use content-writer or each discipline creative builder; not for launch-window battle cards — use sales-enablement-kit; this kit never adjudicates a claim. 叙事赋能包/电梯梯度/发言人问答/审定样板/该说不该说

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Tesler's Law — every process has irreducible complexity that someone must absorb. Use when deciding whether the product or the user carries it. For reducing apparent choice, use `hicks-law`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The index of every pro-workflow skill and command, grouped by job, with when to reach for each and whether it is human-run or auto-triggered. Use when you are not sure which skill fits, want the full map, or ask "what can this do", "which skill for X", "list the workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up recurring or scheduled work — anything the user wants run on a schedule, repeatedly, or at a future time ("every morning", "each weekday at 9am", "daily digest", "weekly report", "remind me", "run this on a cron"). Teaches how to author a durable Vexa Scheduler routine that survives restarts. Use this instead of any OS cron job, system timer, or session-only reminder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Amazon DocumentDB end-to-end — serverless-on-8.0 cluster setup, TLS/VPC/driver config, flexible-schema and vector-search data modeling, MongoDB compatibility assessment, DMS-based migration, slow-query diagnosis, major version upgrades (4.0->5.0->8.0), Well-Architected reviews (41-check wa_review.py), cost estimation, and security hardening. Retrieve for every DocumentDB question and when the user asks to set up or migrate MongoDB to AWS — DocumentDB is AWS's MongoDB-compatible managed database. Triggers: JSON document store, document database, MongoDB on AWS, Nested fields, Lambda cannot connect, TLS handshake, VPC port 27017, IAM auth, Secrets Manager, encryption at rest, $graphLookup, flexible schema, COLLSCAN, compound index, DMS migration, CDC cutover, $vectorSearch, RAG, Global Clusters, DR replication, cost sizing, audit, health check, production-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point and router for every Expo or EAS task. Load this skill first — before writing code and before choosing another expo-* / eas-* skill — when the request, PRD, or spec mentions Expo, EAS, Expo Go, or an expo-* package, or the project has an `expo` dependency in `package.json`. Within that gate it also covers app specs and designs to implement (tabs, stacks, maps, lists, navigation, building from a screenshot), and phrasings like 'implement a mobile app', 'make my app look native', 'add navigation', 'fetch some data', 'upgrade my SDK', 'add Expo to my existing native app', 'ship to the App Store', or 'I'm new to Expo, where do I start'. A fully specified request (SDK pinned, libraries named, layout given) still routes through here — the shared setup rules still apply. Do NOT load it when neither signal is present: a bare React Native project with no `expo` dependency is not Expo work. Detects the real goal, routes to the right expo-* / eas-* skill, and owns the shared setup rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Geolocate or chronolocate a photo with tool-verified reasoning (where was this taken / when was it taken / photo geolocation / geo-guessing). Given one or more photos, intake.py does metadata, OCR and reverse image search (Baidu/Yandex) in one command; clues and candidates go on a candidate board (board.py) that ranks them and gives the next step; clues.py looks up calling codes, driving side, plates and area codes from region packs; for satellite and street view the machine ranks first and you look only at the top few (CLIP in sat_scan.py, DINOv2+SIFT in match.py); plus sun and shadow math, OSM Overpass and DEM skylines. Every conclusion is checked against real data; output is coordinates + error radius, evidence images and tiered confidence. Use when the user shares a photo and asks where was this taken / geolocate this / when was this taken / 这是哪 / 在哪拍的 / 帮我定位这张照片 / 网络迷踪 / 图寻 / 几点拍的.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skillshare change before it becomes a pull request, or review an open pull request. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: review a diff, branch, commit range or PR, check a change before opening a PR, run a pre-Codex review, or find what a change missed. It checks correctness, the repository's documented rules, the originating issue or spec, every consumer of a changed concept, and cleanup (reuse, simplification, efficiency, depth of fix), then verifies each finding against the code before reporting it. Read-only unless the user asks for fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update website docs to match recent code changes, cross-validating every flag against source. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: update documentation, sync docs with code, document a new flag or command, fix stale docs, or update the README. This skill covers all website/docs/ categories (commands, reference, understand, how-to, troubleshooting, getting-started) plus the built-in skill description and README. If you just implemented a feature and need to update docs, this is the skill to use. Never manually edit website docs without cross-validating flags against Go source first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebuilds an app's design system for a clone: colour roles, type scale, spacing, radius, shadows and every component with its states, as design tokens plus component specs, with original assets instead of the target's logos, icons, illustrations or licensed fonts. Includes a WCAG contrast checker. Use when the user says "match the design", "rebuild the design system", "get the colours and fonts", "make it look like X", "design tokens for my clone", or after /replica-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches the app being cloned and reads what its real users say in public reviews (App Store, Google Play, G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit, Hacker News, its own feature-request board), then ranks what they hate, what is missing and what is unsolved, turns it into a fix plan for the clone and a positioning angle you can sell. Every quote is real, verbatim and linked. Use when the user says "what do people hate about X", "read the reviews", "how do I make mine better", "find the gap", "what features are missing", "how do I position this", "make it sellable", or after /replica-diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。