「find」の検索結果

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect antimicrobial resistance genes using AMRFinderPlus, ResFinder, and CARD. Screen isolates and metagenomes for resistance determinants. Use when characterizing resistance profiles in clinical isolates, surveillance samples, or metagenomic data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and track antimicrobial resistance genes using AMRFinderPlus and ResFinder with epidemiological context. Monitor resistance trends and identify emerging resistance patterns. Use when screening genomes for AMR genes or tracking resistance in surveillance programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "find trending topics", "what trends should my brand jump on", or "time a campaign around a cultural moment"; produces a ranked trend report with brand-fit scores, format calls (rising/peak/declining), a cultural calendar, and go/skip recommendations. Not for finding the creators to run those trends — use influencer-discovery; not for building the brand posting calendar from a go verdict — use social-calendar-builder. 热点趋势洞察/借势营销

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across teams. Use when the same research keeps getting redone. For synthesising one study, use `affinity-diagram`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import data into the AWS data lake from S3 files, local uploads, JDBC databases (Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, RDS, Aurora), Amazon Redshift, Snowflake, BigQuery, DynamoDB, or existing Glue catalog tables (migration). Default target is S3 Tables; standard Iceberg on a general purpose bucket is supported where S3 Tables is not adopted. Handles one-time loads, recurring pipelines, migrations. Triggers on: import data, load data, ingest, sync database, migrate table, move data to AWS, set up pipeline, ETL, pull from Snowflake, query BigQuery into S3, export DynamoDB, CTAS, convert to Iceberg. Do NOT use for setting up or troubleshooting Glue connections (use connecting-to-data-source), creating empty tables (use creating-data-lake-table), running queries (use querying-data-lake), finding tables by fuzzy name (use finding-data-lake-assets), catalog audit (use exploring-data-catalog), or SaaS platforms like Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP, MongoDB, Kafka.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full inventory and audit of AWS Glue Data Catalog assets across S3 Tables, Redshift-federated, and remote Iceberg catalogs. Triggers on: inventory the catalog, audit databases, list all tables, catalog overview, data landscape, enumerate catalogs, data inventory, search the catalog. Do NOT use for finding specific data (use finding-data-lake-assets), running queries (use querying-data-lake), or creating tables (use creating-data-lake-table).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute and manage Athena SQL queries across default and federated catalogs (Glue, S3 Tables, Redshift). Triggers on phrases like: query data, run SQL, athena query, analyze table, SQL query, workgroup status, profile table, query Redshift catalog, query S3 Tables. Do NOT use for finding specific data assets (use finding-data-lake-assets), full catalog audits (use exploring-data-catalog), importing data (use ingesting-into-data-lake).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skillshare change before it becomes a pull request, or review an open pull request. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: review a diff, branch, commit range or PR, check a change before opening a PR, run a pre-Codex review, or find what a change missed. It checks correctness, the repository's documented rules, the originating issue or spec, every consumer of a changed concept, and cleanup (reuse, simplification, efficiency, depth of fix), then verifies each finding against the code before reporting it. Read-only unless the user asks for fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Doctrine for drafting and keeping working-group docs under `docs/wg/**` — RFC/RFD specs and findings/research/glossary. A WG doc is a language-agnostic, code-agnostic study of a domain: it argues *why* and defines *what*, never *how in our code*. Use when writing or editing anything under `docs/wg/`, an RFC/RFD, a spec, a design note, a glossary, or research findings — including "write up the design", "document the spec", or "capture what we learned". Not for plans/TODOs (untracked `*.plan.md`), user docs, or SDK API refs — use `docs` to route those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements. Use when user wants strategic product thinking, mentions '10x', wants to find high-impact features, or says 'what would make this 10x better', 'product strategy', or 'what should we build next'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FLOW framework integration for bloggers. Evidence-led content workflow using the Find, Optimize, Win loop with stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (30 blog-applicable prompts, CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW", "FLOW framework", "blog flow", "evidence-led blogging", "find optimize win", or wants stage-specific blog prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FLOW framework integration for bloggers. Evidence-led content workflow using the Find, Optimize, Win loop with stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (30 blog-applicable prompts, adapted from FLOW under CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW framework", "blog flow", "/blog flow", "evidence-led blogging", or "find optimize win", or asks for stage-specific blog prompts. Not for generic prompt writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, runs, and synthesizes customer research — interviews, surveys, win-loss analysis, and message testing — into findings that change decisions. Use this when the customer is being guessed at, before positioning or a major launch, when churn or conversion has an unexplained cause, or when a team is arguing from anecdotes. Also use to turn raw interview notes into usable findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the help center, in-product guidance, and knowledge base that let customers resolve problems without contacting anyone — content, findability, maintenance, and deflection measurement. Use this to build or fix a help center, reduce support volume, write documentation for customers, improve findability, or decide what deserves a help article versus a product fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the ongoing relationship with accounts after the sale — segmenting coverage against account value, building a health score that predicts rather than describes, running reviews customers find worth attending, forecasting renewals honestly, and finding expansion that follows usage instead of quota. Use this to design a customer success motion, decide who gets a named contact, work out why renewals surprise you, or fix a health score everyone ignores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find desktop UI elements using UIAutomation (fast, accurate) or vision recognition (fallback). When you need to locate buttons/menus/icons, get element positions before clicking, or verify UI state. For browser webpage elements, use browser_* tools instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically find references for academic paper Markdown files. Reads full paper text, identifies each knowledge point requiring citation (epidemiological data, mechanism descriptions, existing research conclusions, etc.), searches PubMed for 3-5 most relevant articles per kn...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。