「how」の検索結果

Discover what Cowork can do for YOUR specific role and tasks, for mapping your daily work to Cowork capabilities. Use when exploring what Cowork offers, for planning your Cowork adoption, during onboarding and role discovery, when figuring out where to start, or when the user says "what can cowork do", "what is cowork", "show me cowork features", "how can cowork help me", "what should I use cowork for", or "cowork capabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up safe working habits and a change log so you always know what Cowork has done to your files — and can undo anything. Use when setting up file protection guardrails, for establishing safe automation habits, during initial access configuration, when granting file permissions for the first time, or when the user says "is cowork safe", "file safety", "what if it deletes my files", "audit trail", "safety setup", "I'm nervous about file access", "how do I trust cowork with my files", "can cowork mess up my computer", "I heard someone lost files", or "how do I stay in control".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A 15-minute guided setup that teaches Cowork who you are, how you work, and what tools you use — so every result feels tailored instead of generic. Use when setting up Cowork for the first time, for personalizing your workspace preferences, during onboarding after your first session, when configuring your tools and context, or when the user says "set up cowork", "configure cowork", "why is cowork giving me generic results", "cowork setup", "personalize cowork", "make cowork know me", "cowork feels like chatgpt", or "how do I get better results from cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up a file-based memory system so Cowork always knows who you are, how you work, and where your projects stand. For eliminating repetitive re-introductions at session start, when building persistent context across multiple projects, or during initial Cowork onboarding. Use when the user says "claude doesn't remember me", "memory system", "persistent context", "why does it forget", "remember my preferences", "I keep re-explaining myself", or "how do I make Claude remember things".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shows you how to use Cowork's parallel workers to run multiple tasks at the same time instead of one after another — dramatically cutting the time on batch work. For processing large batches of files or research tasks, when running multiple independent analyses simultaneously, or during a performance optimization session. Use when the user says "speed up", "parallel workers", "batch task", "process multiple files", "why is cowork so slow", "faster", "do several things at once", or "can cowork multitask".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits your Cowork setup across five categories, scores each one, and gives you a prioritized improvement plan. For reviewing how well you are using Cowork, when optimizing your workspace configuration, or during a quarterly productivity review. Use when the user says "health check", "am I using cowork right", "optimize my setup", "cowork audit", "what am I missing", "is my setup good", or "how do I get more out of cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate test report. Use when user says "test report", "results summary", "test status", "show results", "test dashboard", or "how did tests go".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generative Engine Optimization plus agent readiness. Use this skill whenever the user asks about GEO, AEO, LLMO, optimizing content for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini, Copilot), getting cited by LLMs, brand mentions in AI responses, llms.txt, robots.txt for AI crawlers, Schema.org JSON-LD, FAST framework, agent readiness, MCP server discovery, Web Bot Auth, OAuth for agents, API Catalog, agentic commerce (x402, ACP, UCP), Markdown content negotiation, or auditing a site or page for AI visibility. Also trigger when the user says "AI SEO", asks how to "rank in ChatGPT", "show up in Perplexity", "appear in AI Overviews", or wants a site to "speak to AI agents". Trigger even when the request is implicit, such as "review this article so AI search picks it up" or "make our docs agent-friendly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover how a codebase already handles a specific concern — search broadly, find every instance, and assess consistency. The "how does this app do X?" tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply rigorous survey design principles including construct operationalization, Likert scale development, reliability and validity assessment, and common method variance control. Use this skill when the user designs questionnaires, develops measurement items, needs to evaluate Cronbach's alpha or AVE, or when they ask 'how do I operationalize this construct', 'is my scale reliable', or 'how do I control for CMV'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Social Identity Theory to analyze how group categorization, identification, and intergroup comparison drive behavior, bias, and conflict. Use this skill when the user needs to explain in-group favoritism or out-group hostility, diagnose organizational silo dynamics, design inclusive team structures, or when they ask 'why do groups polarize', 'how does team identity affect collaboration', or 'what drives us-vs-them thinking'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Dynamic Capabilities framework (Teece et al., 1997) — sensing, seizing, and transforming — to analyze how firms adapt, integrate, and reconfigure competences in rapidly changing environments. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why some firms sustain advantage while others decline, evaluate organizational agility, distinguish operational from strategic capabilities, or when they ask 'how do we stay competitive as the market shifts', 'why did this firm fail to adapt', or 'what capabilities do we need to build'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Institutional Theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) to analyze how coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures shape organizational structures and practices. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why organizations in the same field look alike, evaluate whether a practice was adopted for legitimacy vs efficiency, analyze regulatory or social pressures on strategy, or when they ask 'why do all firms in this industry do the same thing', 'is this best practice or just conformity', or 'how do regulations shape our structure'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply sustainability frameworks (triple bottom line, SDGs, ESG, circular economy) to evaluate whether strategies balance economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to assess ESG performance, design circular economy strategies, align business models with SDGs, or when they ask 'is this strategy truly sustainable', 'how do we measure ESG impact', 'what does a circular business model look like', or 'how do we avoid greenwashing'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Upper Echelons Theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984) to analyze how top management team characteristics — demographics, experiences, values — shape strategic choices and organizational outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate TMT composition effects on strategy, predict strategic direction from leadership profiles, assess whether managerial discretion enables or constrains executive influence, or when they ask 'does leadership background matter for strategy', 'how does TMT composition affect decisions', or 'why did this management team make that choice'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Kingdon's multiple streams framework to analyze how problems, policies, and politics converge to open policy windows. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why certain policies get adopted while others don't, identify policy windows and entrepreneurial opportunities, or analyze the agenda-setting process in public policy — even if they say 'why did this policy pass now', 'policy window', or 'how do issues get on the agenda'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply social capital theory (Putnam, Coleman, Bourdieu, Burt) to analyze how network structures and trust generate value or impose constraints. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate bridging vs bonding capital, identify structural holes or network closure benefits, assess community or organizational trust dynamics, or when they ask 'how does our network create value', 'are we too insular', or 'where are the structural holes we can exploit'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Service-Dominant Logic (Vargo and Lusch, 2004) and value co-creation principles to reframe exchange and value creation. Use this skill when the user needs to redesign value propositions around service exchange, analyze co-creation dynamics between firms and customers, shift from goods-dominant to service-dominant thinking, or when they ask 'how is value created with customers', 'what is our service logic', or 'how do we enable co-creation'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply signaling theory (Spence, 1973) to analyze how agents communicate private information through costly, credible signals under information asymmetry. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate whether a corporate action serves as a credible signal, analyze dividend or IPO signaling, assess separating vs pooling equilibria, or when they ask 'why do firms pay dividends', 'is this signal credible', or 'how does underpricing signal quality'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply ethnographic methods including prolonged engagement, participant observation, thick description, and netnography to study cultures and communities. Use this skill when the user needs to design fieldwork with immersive observation, interpret cultural practices through thick description, study online communities via netnography, or when they ask 'how do I study a culture or community', 'what is participant observation', or 'how do I apply ethnography to online settings'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply panel data analysis with fixed effects, random effects, and dynamic GMM to exploit longitudinal variation and control for unobserved heterogeneity. Use this skill when the user has repeated observations over time for multiple entities, needs to choose between FE and RE via Hausman test, or when they ask 'how do I control for firm-specific effects', 'fixed or random effects', or 'how to handle endogeneity in panels'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bourdieu's field theory to analyze power relations through the interplay of field, capital, and habitus. Use this skill when the user needs to map positions and position-takings within a social field, analyze how different forms of capital (economic, cultural, social, symbolic) structure competition, explain why actors behave as they do within institutional settings, or when they ask 'why do people in this industry act this way', 'who has power and why', or 'how does this field reproduce inequality'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。