「recommendation」の検索結果

10 C-level advisory agent skills and plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO, Executive Mentor. Multi-role board meetings, strategy routing, structured recommendations. For founders needing executive-level decision support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses the health of a project's PostHog SDK integrations — which SDKs are out of date and how to fix them. Use when a user asks about PostHog SDK versions, outdated SDKs, upgrade recommendations, "SDK health", "SDK doctor" (the former name), or when events or features seem off and it might be due to an old SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic clinical trial design feasibility assessment. Analyzes 6 dimensions (endpoint, population, comparator, effect size, duration, regulatory pathway) using precedent trials and FDA guidance. Produces enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and approval-pathway analysis. Use for trial-protocol design, power/sample-size estimation, comparator selection, and FDA submission strategy. Driven by precedent-based reasoning rather than first-principles math.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used at the start of any computationally intensive scientific task to detect and report available system resources (CPU cores, GPUs, memory, disk space). It creates a JSON file with resource information and strategic recommendations that inform computational approach decisions such as whether to use parallel processing (joblib, multiprocessing), out-of-core computing (Dask, Zarr), GPU acceleration (PyTorch, JAX), or memory-efficient strategies. Use this skill before running analyses, training models, processing large datasets, or any task where resource constraints matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) research — drug-gene interactions (CPIC, PharmGKB), CPIC dosing guidelines, variant-drug-response associations, ethnic-allele-frequency considerations, and metabolizer-status scoring. Use for PGx-informed dosing recommendations, CYP/HLA pharmacogenomic allele interpretation, and clinically-actionable PGx report generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess drug-drug interactions — CYP metabolic interactions (substrate/inhibitor/inducer), transporter (P-gp, BCRP, OATP) effects, pharmacodynamic synergy/antagonism, clinical significance scoring, and management recommendations. Use for polypharmacy review, prescribing decision support, and safety analysis when adding or switching drugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative drug-target validation pipeline. Scores druggability, selectivity, safety profile, ADMET feasibility, and structural tractability with a composite Target Validation Score (0-100) and GO/NO-GO recommendation. Use for go/no-go decisions on a target before commit-to-medchem, target prioritization across a list, and target-deselection rationale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats. This skill should be used when analyzing any scientific data file to understand its structure, content, quality, and characteristics. Automatically detects file type and generates detailed markdown reports with format-specific analysis, quality metrics, and downstream analysis recommendations. Covers chemistry, bioinformatics, microscopy, spectroscopy, proteomics, metabolomics, and general scientific data formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Stellar Community Fund (SCF) Build Award applications. Use when evaluating SCF submissions, covering project fit assessment, technical architecture evaluation, team readiness, traction validation, budget analysis, and funding recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a formatted PDF compliance audit document with findings, risk ratings, remediation recommendations, and sign-off sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WHAT: Generate Codex-authored HTML insights from local Codex sessions and telemetry. WHEN: Use when the user asks for Codex usage analytics, workflow patterns, session summaries, prompting help, or recommendations for improving how they use Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate learning materials and technology for WCAG, Section 508, and accessibility compliance with remediation recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensures designs meet accessibility requirements including WCAG compliance, color contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and focus management. Reviews designs for accessibility issues and provides recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PHP Standards Recommendations (PSR) overview knowledge base. Provides comprehensive reference for all accepted PSRs including PSR-1,3,4,6,7,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20. Use for PSR selection decisions and compliance audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

変更内容からミューテーション/E2Eの推奨度を判定し、強く推奨・範囲が小さい・副作用なしのものは確認なしで実施し、それ以外は最後の報告で確認する。quality-check Step 5から参照実行されるほか、開発中の任意タイミングで単体実行できる。

Work out the order and the loose ends before turning down an offer or withdrawing from a selection process: whether the offer being kept is actually settled in writing, whether each decline is mid-selection, post-offer, or after acceptance, who besides the employer has to be told when the application came through an agent, a school recommendation, or a referral, which reply deadlines have passed, and what documents, expenses, or borrowed items are still outstanding. Use when a user holds more than one offer and needs to decline the rest, wants to withdraw from a process they are no longer pursuing, or has been asked to turn down other employers as a condition; do not use to decide whether to decline, to rule on what declining after acceptance means legally, or to send any message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when deriving EcoSIM plant trait parameter recommendations for a named plant from web and online literature evidence, using a read-only `plant_trait.*.desc` file and the `ndlf43` tree block or `gr3s43` grass block as the starting archetype. Never edit or replace the `.desc` file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks for QA planning, execution, review, release assessment, reporting, status, or test-tool recommendations and the correct PWDEV QA workflow must be selected safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required. Use when asked to "tune questions", "stop asking me that", "too many questions", "show my profile", "what questions have I been asked", "show my vibe", "developer profile", or "turn off question tuning". (gstack) Proactively suggest when the user says the same gstack question has come up before, or when they explicitly override a recommendation for the Nth time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

50 core Rust coding conventions covering naming, data types, strings, error handling, memory, concurrency, async, and modern crate recommendations. Use when reviewing code style or setting up project conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。