822 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run or interpret bounded multi-page Unlighthouse audits for local Lighthouse evidence. Use for site-wide performance, accessibility, best-practice, and SEO regression checks when field data or API quotas are insufficient.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "track where my emails are actually landing after I send", "read my seed-list inbox vs spam vs promotions results", "trend my Gmail Postmaster / Microsoft SNDS reputation", or "did placement drop after my last send"; produces a per-provider inbox/spam/promotions placement read, a domain/IP reputation trend from Postmaster + SNDS, a send-over-send delta with named regressions, and a reusable SEND-S placement snapshot on your own exported telemetry. Not for the pre-send SPF/DKIM/DMARC auth pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for computing the EQS or running the vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件收件箱落点监测/收件箱vs垃圾邮件/Postmaster声誉趋势
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
コミット/PR の「全部置換した」「-N%削減」等の完了主張を grep で反証できる残骸や best/typical/worst 試算で検証し、抽出・集約リファクタでは並列度(Promise.all)/fast-path/遅延評価の性能特性退行と、Map/Set 集約キーの cross-kind 衝突による検出漏れも監査する
Ensure code changes keep logs/metrics/traces useful for debugging failures and regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Covers Flutter testing across all three layers: unit tests (business logic, ViewModels, repositories), widget tests (UI rendering, interactions, golden regression), and integration/E2E tests (full app flows, native OS interactions). Use this skill when writing any Flutter test, setting up mocking with mocktail or mockito, implementing golden file tests, debugging async failures (pumpAndSettle timeouts, Timer leaks, FakeAsync deadlocks), fixing cross-platform golden pixel diffs in CI/CD, testing state management (Riverpod/BLoC/Provider), handling permission dialogs or native system UI with Patrol, or troubleshooting MediaQuery/Theme missing errors in widget tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review FriendlyBet quality, regression risk, test plans, release readiness, version bump discipline, scoring/locking correctness, provider fallback behavior, and dirty-worktree safety. Use before shipping app code, scoring changes, migrations, sports integrations, copy updates, PWA cache changes, or any risky user-facing flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
scikit-learn compatible Python toolkit for time series ML: classify, cluster, regress, segment, transform with 30+ algorithms (ROCKET, InceptionTime, KNN-DTW, HIVE-COTE, WEASEL). Handles panel, multivariate, and unequal-length series. Maintained successor to sktime. Alternatives: sktime (larger ecosystem), tslearn (fewer algorithms), catch22 (features only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en QA exploratoire v4 (tests systématiques, chasse aux bugs, preuves, rapports, régression)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en tests d'agents IA (tests unitaires, intégration, régression, guardrails, red teaming agents)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write focused tdmcp tests for one assigned coverage gap. Use for Vitest/msw unit tests, integration tests, bridge tests, CLI/config/resource tests, and regression tests that should raise coverage without weakening behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pixel-based motion and UI change analysis from frame sequences or screenshots using computer vision and visual comparison. Use when `.transition` or visual effects are not observable via MotionEyes logs, when you only have screenshots/video, when you need regression diffs across builds, or when you need to summarize on-screen changes without instrumentation. Do not use when MotionEyes traces are available and you need precise timing/values; use `motioneyes-animation-debug` instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need the current position in the Lean spec-driven pipeline, or any deterministic check of a Cradle project — status, golden regression, Lean layer walls, regeneration impact, unslop lint, ddd cleanup. Runs the scripts under scripts/ and reports their output verbatim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after the Lean model changed and before touching backend code — regenerates Kotlin from Lean, lists changed generated symbols, the hand-written files and contract tests that reference them, and golden regressions, so the blast radius is known before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes UEFI bootkit persistence mechanisms including firmware implants in SPI flash, EFI System Partition (ESP) modifications, Secure Boot bypass techniques, and UEFI variable manipulation. Covers detection of known bootkit families (BlackLotus, LoJax, MosaicRegressor, MoonBounce, CosmicStrand), ESP partition forensic inspection, chipsec-based firmware integrity verification, and Secure Boot configuration auditing. Activates for requests involving UEFI malware analysis, firmware persistence investigation, boot chain integrity verification, or Secure Boot bypass detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。