「three」の検索結果

Parse natural-language quantities, units, dates, and ranges ("5'11\"", "1.5 cups", "72 in to cm", "three days ago", "between 5 and 10 kg", "it's hot") into canonical, validated values with issue codes and spans — and humanize them back. Use when a form input, LLM tool schema, MCP handler, or import pipeline takes free-text measurements/units/dates. Covers Standard Schema fields (quantityField/dateField/lingoObject) for the AI SDK and MCP, the headless <lingo-input>, unit conversion, and format/humanize round-trips. Zero-dependency TypeScript, deterministic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO: geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification, competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation. Three tiers: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO, and DataForSEO + Google. Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Presentation/Core/Engine split control plane — the canonical entry point for any work decomposing the Yuzu server into three binaries (presentation · core · engine) per ADR-0031-presentation-core-engine-decomposition / ADR-0032 (the admission interlock) / ADR-0033 (access-control spine). Use when the user says "/split", "/pce-split", "/decomposition", asks to plan or implement a split workstream (WS-A*, WS-B*, WS-X*), asks "what's our gap to the presentation/core split" or "is it safe to extract presentation/the engine yet", asks to audit split readiness, or starts work touching the seam (handlers calling stores directly, the INV-31-4 contract test, the Drogon port, `server/presentation` or `server/engine`, the `uce` DB grants, component service identity, or the ADR-0032 admission/grant/audit substrate — `use_case_run_id`, the release log, the capability-declaration registry).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Always use this skill before claiming any work is done, fixed, passing, or complete — even if it seems obvious. Also use when receiving code review feedback from any source (human or automated), when finishing a task or major feature, before committing or creating a PR, or when about to express satisfaction with work. Covers three practices: receiving feedback with technical rigor (no performative agreement), triggering code review via /code-review command or cook/fix pipelines, and verification gates (run the command, read the output, then make the claim). Never skip — the cost of false completion claims is higher than the cost of verifying. References: code-review-reception.md, requesting-code-review.md, verification-before-completion.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or repair lookup filters that constrain a child lookup using fields from the parent record (or a sibling record on the same object). Triggers: 'limit lookup based on another field', 'cross-object lookup filter', 'lookup filter $Source vs $User', 'lookupFilter block in field-meta.xml', 'booleanFilter with three filterItems', 'picker still shows every record after deploy', 'lookup filter error message not translated'. NOT for choosing lookup vs master-detail - use admin/lookup-and-relationship-design. NOT for duplicate matching rule criteria - use admin/duplicate-management. NOT for the rest of the CustomField element set - use admin/custom-field-creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the Arduino Nano (A000005, ATmega328P @ 16 MHz, 5 V) — its 30 KB usable flash, 2 KB SRAM, 1 KB EEPROM, 8-channel 10-bit ADC, six 8-bit PWM pins across three timers, UART shared with the USB-serial chip, I2C on A4/A5, SPI on D10–D13, sleep modes, and the Arduino AVR core + PlatformIO setup around them. Use when working on this board or any ATmega328P Nano clone (FTDI or CH340 USB): project setup, platformio.ini, old-vs-new bootloader uploads, pin mapping, A6/A7 restrictions, timer/Servo/tone conflicts, the 2 KB SRAM budget, analog references, powering from VIN, ICSP recovery, or debugging why something on the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The TypeScript target-language layer for Skmtc generators (@skmtc/lang-typescript): projection base factories, TsSnippet, the three register shapes, identifier kinds and the type-only import machinery, composition helpers, sanitization, TsFile render rules. Use ALONGSIDE skmtc-generator whenever a generator emits TypeScript. Headings are the template for other skmtc-lang-* skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a self-retrospective on a SKMTC-related session — generator authoring, CLI configuration, debugging, or any sustained interaction involving `@skmtc/core`, `@skmtc/cli`, or `@skmtc/gen-*` packages. Captures three distinct outputs: (1) friction entries (mistakes, surprises, overridden defaults, multi-cycle struggles), (2) a "knowledge acquired" block recording facts the agent learned during the session that weren't in its training — the primary signal for doc gaps — and (3) a closing priority list ranking the top 2-3 findings for docs/skills triage. Wins are logged only when they identify a pattern worth codifying that isn't already in a skill. Use this skill when the user asks to "retro", "skmtc retro", "log friction", "reflect on this session", "what did we learn", "run a retrospective", or after substantive SKMTC work (generator authoring, multi-step debugging, non-trivial CLI configuration) where capturing observations would help improve skills, docs, or SKMTC itself. Distinct from the `skmtc-cli` and `skmtc-generator` skills — those guide *doing* the work; this skill captures observations *about* the work. Do not invoke this skill during ordinary work; it is end-of- session (or mid-session-checkpoint) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand what SKMTC is, how its engine works, and the architectural invariants — for agents building or extending infrastructure *around* SKMTC rather than authoring generators or running the CLI. Covers the three-phase pipeline, the host/Worker boundary, cross-generator coordination, the manifest, the attribution / gen-maps (provenance) subsystem, the package graph, the dependency substrate, and the design decisions that make SKMTC behave unlike a typical codegen tool. Use this skill when the user asks "what is SKMTC", "how does the SKMTC engine work", "explain the SKMTC architecture", or is building platform infrastructure around SKMTC — a hosted generate API, a schema or generator registry, tracing or provenance tooling, a web app or SaaS that wraps the engine, or platform-level CI integration. This skill is the system mental model. It does NOT cover authoring generators (→ skmtc-generator), running CLI commands (→ skmtc-cli), or diagnosing broken runs (→ skmtc-debug).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /fl on a ticket with moflo's three standing considerations loaded first — cross-platform (Rule

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the remote rules registry — the shared registry (often connected as a local folder or git repo) that the project's rules are published to and pulled from. Three modes, picked from the user's wording: create scaffolds a new local rules registry ("create a local rules registry", "init a rules registry"); update migrates/promotes local knowledge-base rules from .unikit/memory/ into the remote registry with automatic semver bumps ("migrate local rules to the remote registry", "promote my rules to the registry", "push local rules", "publish local rules", "update the rules registry"); sync pulls registry updates back into memory ("sync the rules registry", "pull registry updates"). Pass "--module <id>" to scope to one knowledge-base module. This skill ONLY orchestrates the CLI (`unikit-ai rules *`) — it never edits .unikit.json or .unikit/memory/ sources directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a finding about the configured engine MCP server into .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of what has to be re-checked here. Use right after a call reported success while changing nothing, ate an argument, or validated a broken state, e.g. "write this down", "record this MCP finding", "the server lied — note it", "add a recheck note", "trap this". Takes three forms of input: the finding in one line, a path to a plan file (harvests the "## MCP Findings" table of that plan and nothing else), or nothing at all — then it takes findings already in the session first, and offers to scan the tables of plans touched since the last audit. The table only, never the plan body. Writes in the one allowed genre — a check to perform; never a lifted gate, never a named workaround, never a claim about what the server can or cannot do. Makes zero MCP calls and needs no editor. To replay, retire, or upstream existing notes use /unikit-mcp-audit instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated testing conventions whenever writing, reviewing, or planning tests: what earns a test and what is coverage theatre, asserting outputs rather than mock calls, the three modes (functional, performance, security), naming and isolation rules, where to mock, and reporting findings for coverage rather than self-filtering. Includes house Jest standards for NestJS unit and contract tests, TDD discipline, and test-report structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three women posing in urban street fashion, dramatic lighting, stylish hairstyles, using reference faces

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product Discovery through an 18-task methodology in 6 blocks — from market analysis to an investor-ready financial plan. Use when someone wants to run Product Discovery, validate a startup, assess a market hypothesis, prepare for an investment round, or raises an adjacent topic — idea validation, niche sizing, competitor teardown, product-market fit, pitch preparation, startup unit economics, geographic expansion into a new country, go-to-market for SEA / Asia / MENA. People rarely name PD explicitly; they say 'is there a market for this', 'assess my idea', 'I need a deck for an angel', 'we are entering Thailand/Singapore/UAE, how do we size it'. Use the skill in those cases too. Three modes: Light (~45 min, idea stage), Full (~2-3 h, MVP with customers), Geographic Expansion (~2 h, product entering a new geography). Produces 3-4 artifacts in /mnt/user-data/outputs/: one-pager.pptx, financial-plan.xlsx, presentation.pptx, optionally interview-guide.docx.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。