「need」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a HyperFrames composition needs a punch-in, punch-out, zoom, reframe, Ken Burns treatment, camera move, visual match/whip handoff, or other seek-safe 2D/3D keyframes; also for GSAP, CSS keyframes, Anime.js, WAAPI, FLIP, paths, masks, SVG morph/draw, text trails, 3D depth, or `hyperframes keyframes` diagnostics. Don't use for broad scene strategy, brand design, media sourcing, captions, or general video planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or refine IDD-ready GitHub issues, roadmap issues, and sub-issues before the normal IDD execution loop begins. Use when a request is too large or ambiguous for one reviewable change, when work needs decomposition or dependency encoding, or when the user asks for issue drafting, roadmap planning, or parallelizable task breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare copy-ready Xiaohongshu/Rednote publish materials from a local XHS article package. Use when the user asks for "输出发布格式", "小红书发布格式", "准备发布", "二次编辑发布格式", or needs title/body/tags/output image directory/checks without browser automation or clicking publish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex adapter for Garry Tan's full gstack methodology across CEO/product pressure, CTO architecture, design, engineering, QA, security, shipping, documentation, and retrospectives. Use when the 总控/CEO or 架构/CTO role needs gstack method routing, implementation-plan hardening, or the user says gstack should help a role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cute 3D toy assets from photo-reference manifests. Use when Codex needs to turn scene photos into 2D toy concept prompts, choose a photo-to-3D route, produce or plan GLB assets for Three.js, or maintain a repeatable personal-gift/toy-character generation workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user edits or criticizes generated copy and you need to extract durable writing-style rules instead of merely remembering surface words.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack careful mode for risky work that needs a conservative pass, hazards, safeguards, and explicit confirmation points before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and audit C/C++ code size, namespace distribution, function complexity, nesting, recurrence, and namespace coupling in the EMULATORS framework. Use when Codex needs codebase statistics, complexity baselines, namespace comparisons, duplication indicators, hotspots, architectural growth analysis, or before/after complexity reports while excluding third-party code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and update the persistent project chronicle (docs/chronicle.md). Trigger when: - The human requests a history summary or chronicle update. - Starting work on a new codebase and needing context on its evolution. - Prompt contains keywords: /chronicle, chronicle, project history, git log summary, history summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The migration step and the package-owned-table exception — NOT the normal collection flow. For app collections use the crouton CLI/skill (schema JSON → `crouton config`); reach here when you then need to generate/apply the Drizzle migration and hit the schema.mjs-only-after-build gotcha ("No schema files found"), or when adding a package-owned infra table (the crouton-flow pattern) that does NOT go through `crouton config`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the weekly "🧹 Housekeeping" digest — a render-only report of repo drift that needs a human eye (stale unmerged branches, mislabeled issues, stuck in-progress tickets, epics ready to close, idle PRs, label-coverage gaps). Reports only, never mutates. Use when asked for a "housekeeping report", "repo drift", "what's stale", or to run the weekly sweep by hand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The map of nuxt-crouton's GitHub workflows and the deploy-pipeline anatomy — what each workflow gates, how a merge reaches Cloudflare, which secrets/tokens exist where, and how the agent-pipeline workflows chain. Use when a CI check fails and you need to know what it is, when asked "which workflow deploys X / why did staging update / what does this check gate / where is that secret / why didn't my label trigger anything", when wiring a new app into CI, or when debugging a deploy that never fired. Trigger phrases: "what runs on merge to main", "map of the workflows", "WORKER_SECRETS_JSON", "why is the daily sweep not running", "deploy-apps vs deploy-app", "which token does this workflow use".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give a pocs/ app a Cloudflare Workers preview deploy so a PR returns a testable staging URL (auth-working). Use when wiring a POC for previews, or when "build X as a poc" needs to end at a clickable link. For launched apps/ apps use the /deploy skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape every agent comment as a short typed brief the owner can triage in seconds — 🔴 issue · 💡 proposal · ✅ done · 🔀 choice · 🛠 action · 👀 review — with all the depth collapsed behind it. Enforced by the require-owner-brief hook. Use before posting ANY GitHub comment as an agent, or when asked to "make this shorter", "brief me", "just tell me what I need to do".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swap the external provider/library that backs a crouton package (e.g. the map renderer, geocoder, editor engine, storage SDK) while keeping the package's public API stable so consuming apps need no changes. Use when asked to "change the X provider", "replace library Y in package Z", "switch from <vendor A> to <vendor B>" inside packages/. Encodes the keep-the-API-stable playbook + the gotchas (dist .d.ts over docs, generator templates, fixtures, dup-dep type clashes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, change, or debug external API integrations, vendor SDK adapters, and bridges to legacy business workflows. Use when an Action or domain service needs an outer technical dependency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ruPet as a practical companion for Ruflo and ruvnet tool workflows, or improve ruPet creation and repair prompts. Use for requests that name ruPet or ask for its tool-aware guidance; ordinary tasks and merely displaying the pet do not need this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a learner needs a structured review session prioritizing high-value topics by recency, error history, and upcoming deadlines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a concept is too abstract for the learner's current level and needs analogy-first teaching before complexity re-injection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。