「wan」の検索結果

Copy a feature flag from one PostHog project to one or more target projects in the same organization. Use when the user wants to duplicate a flag, promote a flag from staging to production, sync flags across projects, or replicate a flag configuration in a different workspace. Covers cohort remapping, scheduled-change handling, encrypted payloads, and the safe defaults (disabled in target, no scheduled changes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and clean up stale feature flags in a PostHog project. Use when the user wants to find unused, fully rolled out, or abandoned feature flags, review them for safety, and then disable or delete them. Covers staleness detection, dependency checking, and safe removal workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements. TRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor a pull request for CI failures, review comments, and merge conflicts — then fix them automatically. Use when a PR is open and you want the agent to keep it merge-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a recurring AI-generated PostHog report — schedule a free-text prompt to run on a cron, with the LLM-synthesized markdown delivered to email or Slack on each tick. Use when the user wants a recurring AI summary of X on any cadence (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly) rather than a one-off report. (To attach an AI summary to an existing insight/dashboard subscription instead of a free-text prompt, see `managing-subscriptions` and its `summary_enabled` option.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to author, edit, and adapt PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to customize a canonical scout for their own setup (narrow its scope, retune its thresholds, add disqualifiers), tweak a scout's schedule or dry-run posture, or write a brand-new scout from scratch for a specific use case (a custom event, a product surface no canonical scout covers). Covers the scout SKILL.md anatomy, the emit contract, the dedupe + scratchpad-memory conventions, the per-team skills-store path vs the canonical in-repo path, and the emit-and-inspect test loop (with dry-run as an optional safety net). Trigger on "write/edit/customize a signals scout", "new scout for X", "tune my scout schedule", "make a scout that watches <event>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) — discover governing equations from time-series data. Builds sparse dynamical system models dx/dt = f(x) from measurements using PySINDy. Use when you have trajectory data and want to find the underlying ODE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-level PyTorch framework with Trainer class, automatic distributed training (DDP/FSDP/DeepSpeed), callbacks system, and minimal boilerplate. Scales from laptop to supercomputer with same code. Use when you want clean training loops with built-in best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantizes LLMs to 8-bit or 4-bit for 50-75% memory reduction with minimal accuracy loss. Use when GPU memory is limited, need to fit larger models, or want faster inference. Supports INT8, NF4, FP4 formats, QLoRA training, and 8-bit optimizers. Works with HuggingFace Transformers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For graph-first PyTorch workflows use torchdrug; for benchmark datasets use pytdc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help teams prepare materials for an SCF referral. Use when a team wants to approach a referrer (SCF Pilot, SDF staff, alumni who completed deliverables, ambassador, or ecosystem partner) with a strong package that makes it easy for the referrer to evaluate and endorse them. Covers the referral form fields, what referrers assess, and how to present your project for referral.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stellar standards, ecosystem, and reference. Covers SEPs (Stellar Ecosystem Proposals), CAPs (Core Advancement Proposals), and a quick map for picking the right standard for wallets, anchors, payments, deposits/withdrawals, federation, deep links, and KYC. Also bundles ecosystem references (DeFi protocols, dev tools, wallets, infra, community projects), curated documentation links, and MCP servers (live tools such as Raven). Use when you need to know which SEP applies, or want a starting point for ecosystem integrations, official docs, or live MCP tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile your local stellar-build usage traces into sharper skills. Use when the user says "optimize my skills", "optimize-skills", "improve my skills from usage", "learn from my traces", "stellar-loop optimize", or wants the learning loop to refine installed skills based on how they've actually been used. DSPy-style prompt optimization over the local trace store at ~/.stellar-build/traces — fully local, reversible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, or validate a PRD. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a PRD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark stellar-build skills to measure quality and the lift from optimization. Use when the user says "bench my skills", "bench-skills", "benchmark skills", "did optimization help", "measure my skills", "stellar-loop bench", or wants to quantify whether /optimize-skills actually improved things. Held-out eval prompts scored by an LLM judge, reproducible with fixed seeds. Fully local.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, or validate a product brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enabling natural multi-agent conversations where each agent is a real subagent with independent thinking. Use when user requests party mode, wants multiple agent perspectives, group discussion, roundtable, or multi-agent conversation about their project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。