7,665 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Searches the aem.live documentation for information on AEM Edge Delivery Services features. Use this skill when you need more information about a feature, want guidance on how to implement a feature, and using existing tools you have to search the web isn't turning up relevant results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement RESTful APIs with proper patterns, validation, and documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement webhooks for event-driven architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides advanced UI/UX design intelligence for portfolio and app work, including design system selection, palette and typography guidance, and implementation checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement feature flags for gradual rollouts and A/B testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or materially revise a repository-local test plan, QA plan, acceptance matrix, or regression checklist on explicit request or when one concrete testability gap blocks formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, test execution, TDD, review, or completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an explicit production launch, staged rollout, launch-monitoring, or rollback plan; do not trigger from AILI SHIP, implementation completion, packaging, review, or release wording that lacks a concrete launch/rollout target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one bounded adversarial pass when the user explicitly requests a report-style stress test or ROSE identifies a concrete material loophole in an existing strategy, spec, plan, review, or claim; do not trigger for an interactive grill/frontier interview or merely before write-back, implementation, reconciliation, or completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve one exact official/current documentation gap when the user requests source verification or a version-sensitive API/SDK/provider/framework question can materially change the current decision; do not trigger for every implementation decision, ordinary framework code, local business logic, or broad research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or materially revise a durable specification when the user explicitly requests a spec/new feature contract or a named ambiguity requires formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary bounded edits, implementation, task breakdown alone, review, or documentation of already-settled behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a bounded security design/hardening pass for explicit security or threat-model intent, or a concrete auth/authorization/secret/untrusted-input/file-upload/sensitive-data risk; do not trigger for every input, data store, third-party call, implementation, review, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplify a bounded code area when the user explicitly requests behavior-preserving refactoring or a named complexity/readability problem is the accepted task; do not trigger automatically after implementation, during every review, for adjacent cleanup, or when behavior may change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a complex concept through a short allegory, story, analogy, metaphor, or intuitive teaching example, then map it back to formal concepts and limits; do not use as the primary skill for implementation, specs, source-cited API guidance, or fiction-only writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify a concrete requirements decision, create one bounded static interview packet, or run an explicitly user-invoked frontier batch over a plan, decision, or idea; trigger on explicit grill/interview/refinement intent or a named material ambiguity, not on ordinary planning, implementation, research, test-plan, report-style review, or BUILD work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize a measured performance problem when the user names a latency/load/Core Web Vitals/resource target or current profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; do not trigger from generic implementation, review, or an unsupported suspicion that code may be slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update source-grounded documentation when the user explicitly asks for docs/ADR/onboarding material, a public contract change requires docs, or an accepted hard-to-reverse decision meets the ADR gate; do not trigger for every feature, architecture discussion, implementation, review, or SHIP request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages deprecation and migration. Use when removing old systems, APIs, or features. Use when migrating users from one implementation to another. Use when deciding whether to maintain or sunset existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a clear scope or accepted specification into ordered tasks/packages when the user explicitly asks for a plan, estimate, dependency order, or task breakdown; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, every multi-step task, speculative parallelism, review, or completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。