7,660 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze content sequences within a section and provide neutral descriptions for AEM Edge Delivery Services. Invoked per section during page import to identify breaking points between default content and blocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AEM Cloud Service expert skill for Sling ResourceChangeListener. Covers the lightweight listener + JobConsumer pattern, migration from javax.jcr.observation.EventListener and resource-topic OSGi EventHandler, ResourceChangeListener vs ExternalResourceChangeListener decision, OSGi filter configuration, review checklist, troubleshooting (silent failures, hot-path blocking, missing service-user mapping), and common pitfalls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview and verify imported content in local AEM Edge Delivery Services dev server. Validates rendering, compares with original page, and troubleshoots common issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two versions of an AEM Edge Delivery Services page to identify what changed. Fetches preview vs live, or two different URLs, and produces a detailed content diff showing added, removed, and modified content, metadata, and blocks. Use when reviewing changes before publishing, auditing content modifications, or tracking content evolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch up-to-date, version-specific documentation for any major library (Next.js 16, Sanity, LangGraph, React, Tailwind CSS, Vitest, Framer Motion) via the Context7 MCP server. Use when writing code against unfamiliar or recently-changed framework APIs, when training data may be stale, when resolving deprecations or version-specific syntax, or when the repo warns about framework drift (e.g. the nextjs-agent-rules block in portfolio-v1/AGENTS.md). Invokes the resolve-library-id and get-library-docs MCP tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edits an existing blog post's content or metadata in local MD files. Use when the user wants to modify, update, or improve a blog post.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a new blog post as a local Markdown file with YAML frontmatter in content/blog/. Use when the user wants to write, draft, or create a new blog post.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to fix a specific react-doctor finding on the Namias portfolio. Reads the report, locates the file, applies the canonical fix pattern, re-runs the tool, and commits the slice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve one exact official/current documentation gap when the user requests source verification or a version-sensitive API/SDK/provider/framework question can materially change the current decision; do not trigger for every implementation decision, ordinary framework code, local business logic, or broad research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
E2E artifact handling routing. Use when traces, videos, screenshots, reports, or failure bundles need controlled repository-local placement; do not use for simple unit tests or production-mutating E2E flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prefer a fresh matching specialist for a clear bounded non-trivial package when current capabilities and permissions permit it; use direct ROSE work only for accepted direct-work exceptions or a concrete block.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce or apply an approved report-first proposal for workflow, ROSE, skill, command, subagent, memory, install, or harness-doc changes; use after harness-issue-triage localizes a harness problem or when the user explicitly requests harness maintenance, and do not edit core harness files without explicit human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go concurrency - sync primitives, channel semantics, the select statement, and the standard channel patterns (cancellation/done-channel, fan-out/fan-in, pipeline, or-done, context, worker-pool). Use when writing or reviewing Go that spawns goroutines, shares state, or coordinates over channels, even if the user never says "concurrency" - e.g. data races, deadlocks, goroutine leaks, sync/context/select usage, or "make this parallel". Distilled from luk4z7/go-concurrency-guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation. Searchable local data: 79 searchable styles (50 active), 192 product palettes and reasoning profiles, 74 font pairings, 119 UX guidelines, 105 icons, 17 GSAP presets, 25 chart types, and 22 stacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements accessible modals and drawers with focus trap, ESC to close, scroll lock, portal rendering, and ARIA attributes. Includes sample implementations for common use cases like edit forms, confirmations, and detail views. Use when building "modals", "dialogs", "drawers", "sidebars", or "overlays".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates custom React hooks for common patterns including data fetching, forms, authentication, local storage, debounce, and more. Use when users request "create custom hook", "React hook for", "useX hook", or "reusable hook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches the AI to design like a high-end agency. Defines the exact fonts, spacing, shadows, card structures, and animations that make a website feel expensive. Blocks all the common defaults that make AI designs look cheap or generic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when automating research session rituals in Claude Code with hooks, such as session-start context injection, daily research logging, session-end persistence, or pre-commit guards that block secrets and unverified citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks about "parallel agents", "background tasks", "run_in_background", "non-blocking agents", "check agent progress", "TaskOutput", "retrieve agent results", or discusses running multiple agents concurrently. Covers patterns for launching agents in background, monitoring progress, and retrieving results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting Z-Wave smart home devices (door locks, sensors, garage controllers) — common in mid-2010s smart home deployments still in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup) PIN attack methodology — Pixie Dust offline attack against vulnerable chipsets (Ralink, Realtek, Broadcom, MediaTek), online PIN brute-force with reaver/bully, lockout handling, time-of-day evasion, WPS push-button vulnerability windows, and PIN-to-PSK derivation. Use when a target SOHO router exposes WPS — common on consumer ISP gear, often left enabled by default even when WPS attacks have been known for over a decade.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunting skill for ssrf vulnerabilities. Built from 15 public bug bounty reports including AWS metadata SSRF (HackerOne $25k Analytics PDF, Shopify Exchange $25k, Capital One 106M-record breach, Dropbox/HelloSign $4,913), GCP metadata SSRF (Snapchat $4k), Azure IMDS SSRF (Azure DevOps $15k chain, ChatGPT Custom Actions MSRC), DNS rebinding SSRF (Concrete CMS, GitLab UrlBlocker), gopher-protocol-to-Redis-RCE (Yahoo Mail $15k), link-preview SSRF (Reddit Matrix $6k), and headless-browser PDF-generator SSRF chains. Use when hunting SSRF on any target — OOB Collaborator confirmation mandatory for blind cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。