「aris」の検索結果

Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. Warning-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to model personal financial scenarios — house purchase + rental income (ADU, bedroom rentals, house-hacking), renovation budgets, monthly cash flow, big-purchase decisions, savings/investment what-ifs for a household. Ships with a house scenario template; other scenarios (refi, car, education, retirement, side income) slot in as templates. Outputs markdown scenario comparison tables. Saves scenarios to ~/Documents/personal-cfo/ with an index in ~/.config/makerskills/personal-cfo/archive/. Composes with decide, deep-research (rental comps, rates), business-brainstorm, second-brain. Triggers on "/personal-cfo," "model this scenario," "house math," "rental forecast," "monthly cash flow," "what if I rent out the ADU," "compare these housing scenarios," "should we buy this house," "house-hack math," "renovation budget."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build students' capacity to read historical documents closely — attending to word choice, tone, and rhetoric as evidence of perspective. Use when students summarise sources without analysing language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more band-tagged frameworks and produces a framework-neutral topic matrix showing coverage and gaps across all inputs, plus an optional reference-centric PLC crosswalk document when a reference framework is supplied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comparable company analysis for A-share equities. Adapts the original comps-analysis skill for Chinese market data sources, A-share trading multiples, and domestic peer selection. Triggers on "A股可比公司", "可比分析", "comps China", "peer comparison A-share", "可比公司分析", or "trading comps [industry]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," or "building many pages for SEO." For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'ROI calculator,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' or 'buyer persona card.' For competitor battle cards and comparison pages, see competitor-alternatives. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The BloodGen3Module package provides functions for R user performing module repertoire analyses and generating fingerprint representations. Functions can perform group comparison or individual sample analysis and visualization by fingerprint grid plot or fingerprint heatmap. Module repertoire analyses typically involve determining the percentage of the constitutive genes for each module that are significantly increased or decreased. As we describe in details;https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mastR is an R package designed for automated screening of signatures of interest for specific research questions. The package is developed for generating refined lists of signature genes from multiple group comparisons based on the results from edgeR and limma differential expression (DE) analysis workflow. It also takes into account the background noise of tissue-specificity, which is often ignored by other marker generation tools. This package is particularly useful for the identification of g

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A first step in the data analysis of Mass Spectrometry (MS) based proteomics data is to identify peptides and proteins. With this respect the huge number of experimental mass spectra typically have to be assigned to theoretical peptides derived from a sequence database. Search engines are used for this purpose. These tools compare each of the observed spectra to all candidate theoretical spectra derived from the sequence data base and calculate a score for each comparison. The observed spectrum

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The semantic comparisons of Gene Ontology (GO) annotations provide quantitative ways to compute similarities between genes and gene groups, and have became important basis for many bioinformatics analysis approaches. GOSemSim is an R packag

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cogeqc aims to facilitate systematic quality checks on standard comparative genomics analyses to help researchers detect issues and select the most suitable parameters for each data set. cogeqc can be used to asses: i. genome assembly and annotation quality with BUSCOs and comparisons of statistics with publicly available genomes on the NCBI; ii. orthogroup inference using a protein domain-based approach and; iii. synteny detection using synteny network properties. There are also data visualizat

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BEER implements a Bayesian model for analyzing phage-immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-seq) data. Given a PhIPData object, BEER returns posterior probabilities of enriched antibody responses, point estimates for the relative fold-change in comparison to negative control samples, and more. Additionally, BEER provides a convenient implementation for using edgeR to identify enriched antibody responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides Bayesian PCA, Probabilistic PCA, Nipals PCA, Inverse Non-Linear PCA and the conventional SVD PCA. A cluster based method for missing value estimation is included for comparison. BPCA, PPCA and NipalsPCA may be used to perform PCA o

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use RightStack as a read-only Web3 stack advisor for architecture recommendations, workflow inspection, tool comparisons, and package-migration checks. Use for planning; do not treat corpus output as implementation proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-spectrum Amazon competitor analysis. Compare listings, pricing, reviews, advertising strategy, and market positioning against direct competitors. Identify weaknesses to exploit and strengths to counter. Use when the user asks about competitor analysis, competitive research, ASIN comparison, pricing analysis, or how to beat competitors on Amazon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon FBA and FBM shipping cost calculator and fulfillment optimization. Dimensional weight analysis, storage fee calculation, removal cost estimation, and fulfillment method comparison. Use when the user asks about Amazon shipping costs, FBA fees, fulfillment costs, storage fees, or shipping calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon A+ Content strategy and creation. Module layouts, persuasive copy, comparison charts, image briefs, and conversion optimization. Use when the user asks about A+ Content, Enhanced Brand Content, product storytelling, or Amazon listing enhancement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。