「compare」の検索結果

Turn a YouTube video idea into a designer-ready thumbnail brief: focal subject, face and emotion, a text overlay of 4 words or fewer that the title does not repeat, contrast and composition, and 2 to 3 A/B concepts for Test and Compare. Built on 2026 principles (one focal point, legible at 120 pixels, complements the title). Outputs the brief plus the Publora attach step (the image upload itself is out of band). Use to plan a thumbnail. Not for title words (use yt-title-optimizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly marketing audit and operating review. Pulls the last 7 days of source-backed marketing, analytics, content, paid media, lead, watcher, and audit data; compares it to the prior 7 days; flags urgent issues; and produces a weekly scorecard plus action list. Use when "weekly audit", "weekly marketing review", "weekly check-in", "weekly scorecard", "what changed this week", "Friday marketing review", or any request for a recurring 7-day marketing audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly marketing audit and executive review. Pulls the last 30 days of source-backed marketing, analytics, SEO, CRO, content, paid media, lifecycle, reputation, and pipeline data; compares it to the previous period; summarizes strategic learning; and produces an executive report plus next-month plan. Use when "monthly audit", "monthly marketing review", "monthly report", "executive marketing review", "board-ready marketing report", "month-end audit", or any request for a 30-day marketing audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive intelligence teardown — 5-layer analysis (signals, product, marketing, positioning, strategy) plus sales battlecard. Use when "competitor analysis", "competitive teardown", "who are our competitors", "battlecard", "competitive intel", "compare us to X", "what is X doing", or any request to research, analyze, or position against competitors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily ad performance check-in across platforms. Pulls live metrics from Meta, Google, and LinkedIn via deterministic scripts, compares against benchmarks and previous period, flags overspend/underperformers/policy issues, and outputs a quick daily summary with action items. Use when "daily ad review", "how are my ads doing today", "ad check-in", "morning ad report", "daily ad summary", "check ad performance", "ad dashboard", "daily ads", or any request for a recurring or quick-glance ad performance review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for GraphQL schemas, persisted queries, RPC manifests, generated clients, OpenAPI drift, hidden operations, and contract-to-handler mismatches. Use when the user asks to inspect GraphQL or RPC requests, compare client contracts to live handlers, recover hidden operations, trace generated clients, or explain how schema or contract drift produces the decisive behavior. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer a supplied video into a shot-by-shot generation specification, displayed evidence frames, and paired Chinese-English prompt packages. Use for requests such as 视频反推提示词, 视频转提示词, 从视频生成提示词, 视频逆向提示词, 逐镜头反推, 分镜拆解并生成提示词, 反推视频 prompt, or video-to-prompt; also use for Veo, Sora, Kling, Wan, generic prompt adaptation, and bounded generate-compare-optimize loops. Do not use for ordinary video summaries or basic transcription.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Index local coding-agent sessions into a searchable SQLite-backed view so you can inspect usage, compare failures, and recover prior context quickly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BackstopJS gives agents a repeatable way to capture reference screenshots, compare UI states, and flag visual regressions before changes ship. This skill centers on the real BackstopJS project and turns browser-based layout comparison into a structured QA workflow for web teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a real-task benchmark suite against OpenClaw agents so model or harness changes can be compared before they hit production workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds and compares 184,900 swimming spots worldwide (beaches, lakes, bathing places) with live water temperature, wind, UV and wave signals, local guides and source-backed activity providers, via the public BeachFinder MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode through bounded H100 post-training tasks and compare how well each agent improves a base LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare browser-agent reliability on a repeatable task and anti-bot suite before choosing a stack or claiming progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors ArgoCD applications for configuration drift using the ArgoCD REST API and grpc-gateway. Compares live Kubernetes manifests against Git-declared state and generates remediation playbooks via kubectl diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies content gaps using the Ahrefs API v3 /site-explorer/organic-keywords endpoint. Compares competitor keyword profiles and surfaces untapped opportunities with volume, KD, and SERP feature data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel agent orchestration for OST exploration. Fan-out multiple solution explorations, fan-in results to compare and select winners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A/B test CLAUDE.md instruction changes against eval benchmarks. Capture baselines, test variants, compare results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares build vs buy alternatives with risk-adjusted returns, time-to-value, and execution probability assessment. Use when evaluating growth strategies, comparing M&A vs organic investment, or analyzing make-vs-buy decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feed actual task results back into agent memory for calibration. Compares predicted vs actual outcomes, records accuracy scores, and tracks estimation quality, prediction quality, and decision quality over time to improve future agent performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end international trip planning: turns "I want to go to X for N days" into a verified, bookable plan — route skeleton across cities, flight price scans (international + domestic legs), train-vs-fly decisions, hour-by-hour daily timelines with opening hours, dwell times, holiday collisions and tappable turn-by-turn map links (小时级行程+地图导航+离线KML), hotel shortlists by neighborhood, budget rollup, and a booking checklist with deep links. Use this whenever the user asks to plan a trip, vacation, itinerary or honeymoon, compare flight dates/prices, pick between cities or routes, schedule a travel day hour by hour, fill a spare block of time ("I'm near X with 2 free hours"), turn a finished plan into a designed page (eight themed renders: illustrated / clay / noir / glass / journal / zine / splash / portal — 插画/黏土/夜航/玻璃/手账/Zine/闪屏/穿越版), or asks 旅行规划/行程安排/机票比价/去某国玩N天怎么安排/现在有空档干嘛/把行程做成好看的网页 — even if they only mention one piece (just flights, just hotels, or just navigation), the playbook and verification rules here still apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract data from subcontractor bid PDFs and produce a comparison spreadsheet. Feeds into /bid-evaluator. Triggers: 'tabulate bids', 'bid comparison', 'compare bids', 'buyout analysis', 'bid tab'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research UI component patterns across the component.gallery corpus — 60 canonical component types, ~95 production design systems, 2,600+ examples — plus an AI-era overlay (prompt inputs, tool-call cards, streaming status, citations) and composite patterns (command palette, app shell, agent console). Compare implementations, find alternative component names, ground frontend decisions in real-world precedent. Pairs with minoan-frontend-design for research-then-build workflows. Triggers on component patterns, how do others implement X, design system research, component comparison, AI chat components, agent UI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。