「comparison」の検索結果

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert unstructured documents into LLM-ready structured data. Supports PDF, Word, PPT, and images; extracts paragraphs, formulas, tables, charts, and other elements in one step; generates up to 8 levels of headings; and outputs Markdown organized in reading order. Useful for field extraction, comparison and validation, knowledge retrieval, and intelligent Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two local documents and convert differences into LLM-ready Markdown in one synchronous call. Supports PDF, Word, PPT, and image documents accepted by Calliper, and returns a structured markdown diff table suitable for change review, clause comparison, downstream extraction, and rule-based validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking options with weights, constraints, confidence, tradeoff reasoning, sensitivity analysis, and explainable recommendations. Use when the user asks for decision support, MCDA, weighted scoring, prioritization, vendor selection, route planning, hiring shortlist ranking, tool comparison, procurement decisions, or auditable agent decision logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A-share short-term trading decision skill for 1-5 day horizon. Use when you need real-data market sentiment, sector rotation, strong stock scanning, capital flow confirmation, date-based short-term signal scoring, prediction logging, and next-day market comparison for CN A-share momentum trading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground GEODE design and evaluation work in Stanford CS329A Parts 2 and 5. Use for test-time compute, planning, multi-step reasoning, deep research, LATS, independent subplans, best-of-N, repair depth, measurement replication, verifier authority, and GEODE/Eco²/SIL/Crucible comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codebase audit + refactoring workflow. Dead code detection, God Object splitting, duplicate function removal, design flaw identification, frontier comparison verification. Triggered by "audit" ("감사"), "dead code" ("데드코드"), "refactor" ("리팩토링"), "god object", "duplication" ("중복"), "design flaw" ("설계 결함") keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical blog post writing guide. rooftopsnow.tistory.com style — Korean formal technical prose, architecture diagrams, code blocks + design intent commentary, table comparisons, checklist wrap-up. Triggers on "blog", "포스팅", "블로그", "기술 글", "tech blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a conversion-focused landing page that compares offers, pricing cues, and trust signals for a family law practice. Use when handling offer...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a plain-language comparison of advance directives and POLST/MOLST forms, covering legal status, clinician signatures, emergency precedence, clinical appropriateness, and document coordination. Use when the user asks about advance directive vs. POLST, living will vs. DNR, which document EMS follows, POLST vs. MOLST vs. POST, whether a healthy person needs a POLST, or document coordination in elder law, estate planning, or serious illness contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate publish-grade SVG+PNG technical diagrams — architecture, data flow, flowchart, sequence, agent-memory, class, ER, state-machine, comparison, timeline, and more — across 8 visual styles. Writes output to tasks/visuals/ or an active plan's visuals/ directory. Requires rsvg-convert (librsvg) for PNG export; degrades gracefully to SVG-only when absent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 4-6 parallel design mockups for rapid visual comparison — adapted from gstack /design-shotgun pattern

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze reviewed Grafana log evidence for event patterns, error-rate changes, and enrolled security markers. Use when a user needs bounded log analytics for an incident window, error-log comparison, anomaly triage, operational debugging, or a cautious check of approved security signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect reviewed Grafana infrastructure evidence for host or fleet CPU usage, memory load, disk space, and system load. Use for server-health checks, capacity symptoms, resource saturation, disk pressure, cloud or local host comparisons, and bounded infrastructure triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review approved Grafana business-intelligence evidence for revenue, conversion, and operational KPIs. Use for bounded KPI scorecards, financial or operational metric checks, baseline comparisons, and business-unit reviews without changing source systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor reviewed Grafana telemetry and freshness evidence for IoT devices and edge fleets. Use for smart devices, home automation sensors, remote equipment, wind turbines, space hardware, device-fleet freshness, missing telemetry, and bounded edge-health comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rapidly generate up to 25 distinct ad creative hypotheses for testing. Produces a matrix of angles (pain, benefit, social proof, urgency, curiosity, comparison) x formats (static, carousel hook, UGC-style, bold-text overlay) with headline, visual prompt, and rationale for each, then generates the visuals with any image tool. Use when the user wants "ad variations", "ad concepts", "creative testing batch", "give me 25 ads", or paid-social creative ideation. Part of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference with treatment/control groups over time. Use when user mentions: treatment effects, policy evaluation, pre/post comparison, parallel trends, DID, DiD, difference in differences, natural experiment, quasi-experimental.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。