2,078 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validate and score Claude Code skill packages for quality, completeness, and best-practice compliance. Tests Python scripts, checks YAML frontmatter, and generates reports. Use when creating, validating, or auditing skill packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts, iteration-count reporting, PR signoff comments, and blocked-state handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and recommend **combinations** of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks. Provides two recommendation strategies — **Maximum Quality** (best skill per subtask) and **Minimum Dependencies** (fewest installs). Use this skill whenever the user wants to find skills, asks "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", or describes a task that likely requires multiple capabilities working together. Also use when the user mentions composing workflows, building pipelines, or needs help across several domains at once — even if they only say "find me a skill". This skill supersedes simple single-skill search by decomposing the task into subtasks and assembling an optimal skill portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatic final verification pass on completed deliverables. Runs at the end of every fable-mode run — those skills invoke it before delivery. Also triggers when the user says "double check this". Uses a panel of fresh checker agents when spawning is authorized (otherwise a cold self-check) to verify the finished output — not to redo the task. Any FAIL gets fixed and re-checked before delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For signup/registration optimization, see signup. For ongoing email sequences, see emails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates — highest value), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retrospective (full structured findings). Lessons are formatted for immediate reuse, not filed and forgotten. Use when a risk materialises, a scope change lands, a phase completes, or a matter closes and you want to convert what happened into something useful for the next matter. Trigger on: 'capture a lesson', 'what did we learn', 'matter close', 'retrospective', 'lessons learned', 'what went wrong', 'what worked', 'phase gate review', 'debrief', 'extract the learning', 'close the matter', 'what should we do differently', 'pattern from this matter', 'improve the next one'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete sanctions and export control analysis tool — individual designations, sectoral sanctions, dual-use goods, payment systems (SWIFT/USD), and extraterritorial regimes (EAR/ITAR/ FDPR US, ECL China). Triggers: "is X sanctioned?", "can I do business with X?", "can I sell Y to Z?", "pétrole Russie", "biens à double usage", "gel des avoirs", "sanctions internationales", "liste OFAC", "liste UE", "double usage", "embargo", "licence d'exportation", "SWIFT", "paiement en dollars", "US goods", "FDPR", "EAR", "ITAR", "BIS", "ECL chine", "no re-export clause", "sanctions sectorielles", "puis-je travailler avec X?", or any transaction involving a foreign person, product, sector, destination country, or payment in USD/EUR. Always adapt to user profile. Always run for any sanctions or export control query — even vague or exploratory ones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a complete lesson study cycle from research question through collaborative planning to research lesson. Use when planning jugyou kenkyuu or collaborative teacher inquiry into practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a complete explicit instruction sequence from teacher modelling through guided practice to independent work. Use when teaching new skills, procedures, or concepts through direct instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesise completed KUD charts into a developmental progression matrix and per-competency narrative sections. Use when you need a programme-level view of how knowledge, understanding, and performance develop across bands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a complete document-based history lesson using the Reading Like a Historian four-part structure. Use when planning a primary source inquiry lesson or converting a textbook lesson into document-based investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate compassionate systems tools from issue or aspiration to wise action. Use when a class needs a complete inquiry workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage improvement work and run or resume accepted measured loops in a local project. Architecture, documentation, UX, product study, open research, taste, and one-shot fixes stay direct unless the user explicitly requests repeated measurement with a complete experiment contract.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On-demand procedures for the ComfyUI sidebar panel agent that are too long to sit in the system prompt. Read it when a task lands in one of these areas. subgraph boundary rails and blueprint reuse, merging or composing workflows across tabs, pinning your edits to one workflow, opening staged or downloaded workflow files, untangling Get/Set-bus and rgthree toggle-heavy graphs, authoring rgthree Fast Groups nodes, the LoRA Manager autocomplete-node limitation, the CivitAI browser flow, downloading model weights, reading hardware and runtime stats, Prompt Director audits, custom-node crash recovery, run-to-node render debugging, and multi-stage pipeline chaining. Each section is a lookup, not background reading. Reach for the one you need instead of guessing, and follow the tool's own description for parameter detail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug a WRONG or imperfect render (not a hard error) by inspecting inputs and intermediate steps with run-to-node. Render one branch up to an output, preview-tap latents/masks/preprocessor maps, localize the first bad stage, then fix. Use when a final image/video completes but looks wrong, such as artifacts, wrong subject/pose/composition/color, blur, a ControlNet/IPAdapter/mask/LoRA not taking, or a two-stage refiner or upscale degrading the result. For errors/OOM/missing nodes use the troubleshooting skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a personalized Second Brain PRD from a completed requirements template. Use when the user has filled out my-second-brain-requirements.md and wants to generate their build plan. Triggers on "create my second brain PRD", "generate my PRD", "build my second brain plan", "/create-second-brain-prd", or after completing the requirements template.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master orchestrator that generates all implementation specs (PRD, Architecture, UX, Implementation, Test, Release) from product plan. Use when generating complete specification package.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。