1,140 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Stress-test a design decision with premortem/backcast analysis, then produce a risk-calibrated recommendation that maps to ADR fields. Use when: (1) Multiple competing architecture options, (2) Irreversible or high-risk design choices, (3) /discuss identifies a complex trade-off
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Router best practices for type-safe routing, file-based routing, data loading, search params, and navigation in React. Use when building React SPAs with complex routing, implementing type-safe search params, setting up route loaders, integrating with TanStack Query, or configuring code splitting and preloading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Form best practices for type-safe form management, validation, field composition, and submission handling in React. Use when building forms with complex validation, integrating schema libraries (Zod/Valibot/ArkType), composing reusable form components, managing array/dynamic fields, or integrating with meta-frameworks (TanStack Start, Next.js, Remix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pythinker Browser Extension lets AI control the user's real browser — navigate, click, type, read, screenshot, and interact with any website using the user's actual login sessions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to interact with websites, automate browser tasks, scrape web content, or perform any action requiring a real browser. Also use when the user mentions "browser", "webpage", "open URL", "screenshot", or asks to read/interact with any website. Use even for simple-sounding browser requests — the daemon handles all complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI prompt chains and multi-step workflows for complex tasks. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-chain-builder related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manus-style context engineering for Agent Teams. Coordinate multiple Claude Code instances with shared planning files. Use when complex tasks need parallel work (code review, debugging, feature development). Requires CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered autonomous data extraction that navigates complex sites and returns structured JSON. Use this skill when the user wants structured data from websites, needs to extract pricing tiers, product listings, directory entries, or any data as JSON with a schema. Triggers on "extract structured data", "get all the products", "pull pricing info", "extract as JSON", or when the user provides a JSON schema for website data. More powerful than simple scraping for multi-page structured extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches you how to break large tasks into stages, save your place between sessions, and recover smoothly when a task gets interrupted. Use when planning a multi-day project, for breaking down large work into manageable stages, during recovery from an interrupted session, when managing complex ongoing work, or when the user says "cowork stopped in the middle", "token limit", "task too large", "context management", "how to do big tasks", "session got cut off", "cowork forgot what we were doing", "how do I work on something over multiple days", "it lost track of the project", or "my task is too big for one session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive 4-phase debugging methodology for complex bugs. Use for bugs that aren't immediately obvious or have resisted quick fixes. Keywords: bug, error, fix, debug, broken, crash, fail, exception
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep root cause analysis using the 5 Whys and Fishbone techniques. Use when systematic debugging hasn't found the cause, or for complex systemic issues. Keywords: root cause, why, underlying, fundamental, systemic, deep, origin
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process multimedia files with FFmpeg (video/audio encoding, conversion, streaming, filtering, hardware acceleration) and ImageMagick (image manipulation, format conversion, batch processing, effects, composition). Use when converting media formats, encoding videos with specific codecs (H.264, H.265, VP9), resizing/cropping images, extracting audio from video, applying filters and effects, optimizing file sizes, creating streaming manifests (HLS/DASH), generating thumbnails, batch processing images, creating composite images, or implementing media processing pipelines. Supports 100+ formats, hardware acceleration (NVENC, QSV), and complex filtergraphs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating multiple specialized agents for complex distributed tasks. Keywords: multi-agent, orchestrator, subagent, handoff, swarm, supervisor, agent topology, coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced Agentic Coding framework providing mission briefs, guardrails, and integration hints for complex tasks. This skill ensures high-quality output through disciplined automation and systematic workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, or debugging complex agentic workflows using state machine patterns. Keywords: state machine, durable execution, agent orchestration, graph-based agents, workflow checkpoints, C4 protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding tasks to Codex AI for implementation, analysis, and alternative solutions. Use when you need a second AI perspective, want to explore different approaches, or need specialized Codex capabilities for complex coding tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to classify learning objectives and design assessments across six cognitive levels. Use this skill when the user needs to write learning objectives at specific cognitive levels, align assessment with instructional goals, or evaluate curriculum for cognitive complexity distribution — even if they say 'how to write learning objectives', 'what level of thinking does this require', or 'higher-order thinking skills'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Cognitive Load Theory to optimize instructional design by managing intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load within working memory limits. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose why learners are overwhelmed, redesign training or documentation for better comprehension, evaluate UI/UX information architecture for cognitive burden, or when they ask 'why is this tutorial confusing', 'how to simplify complex instructions', or 'what causes information overload'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Complex Adaptive Systems theory to analyze phenomena exhibiting emergence, self-organization, co-evolution, and edge-of-chaos dynamics. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a system behaves unpredictably despite known components, model agent-based interactions that produce emergent outcomes, analyze fitness landscapes, or when they ask 'why does this system behave in ways no one designed', 'how do local interactions create global patterns', or 'why do small changes sometimes cause massive system shifts'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight design smell review for modules and APIs—coupling, cohesion, naming, boundaries, and unnecessary complexity. Use before large refactors or when code feels hard to change. Complements gstack/review (diff-focused).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply exponential smoothing methods for time series forecasting with weighted moving averages. Use this skill when the user needs simple, robust forecasts, implement Holt-Winters for seasonal data, or build lightweight forecasting without complex models — even if they say 'simple forecast', 'moving average prediction', or 'smoothing method'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。