「cost」の検索結果

Check whether a raise, more hours, or a new job could cost you more in lost benefits than you gain — the 'benefits cliff' — before you accept it. Use when asked will a raise hurt my benefits, benefits cliff, if I make more will I lose my food stamps or medicaid, or should I take more hours. Produces a plain map of which benefits phase out at what income (and which cut off suddenly vs. taper), a rough read on whether a specific income change helps or hurts net, the ones with hard cliffs to watch (childcare, Medicaid, housing), the moves that soften a cliff, and where to get a real benefits screening. Not financial/benefits advice; points to a benefits counselor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Present a design to a client so they can make a decision rather than react to a picture — the brief restated, the moves explained against it, the options with their trade-offs, and a specific decision requested. Use when asked to present a design to a client, prepare a design review meeting, present concept options, or when a client keeps changing their mind after sign-off. Produces the presentation structure, the brief-to-design traceability, the options with honest trade-offs, the cost and programme position, and the decision record that makes sign-off stick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut through the model soup to buy the right appliance — the features that actually matter for you, the ones that are marketing, and when to buy. Use when asked which [fridge/washer/dishwasher] should I buy, help me choose an appliance, what features do I need, or is this appliance worth it. Produces a needs-based feature shortlist (must-have vs nice-to-have vs marketing fluff), fit and capacity checks, reliability and running-cost considerations, warranty/extended-warranty guidance, and timing tips — flagging to verify current models, prices, and specs before buying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a blameless postmortem for an incident caused by an AI agent or LLM feature — hallucinated facts shipped to users, runaway tool use, prompt injection, cost blowouts, or wrong actions taken autonomously. Use when asked to write up an AI incident, analyse why an agent did something wrong, or produce corrective actions after an LLM failure. Produces a structured postmortem with trace reconstruction, a root-cause layer analysis, and corrective actions including a permanent regression case. For non-AI production incidents use incident-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work through the first hours and days after a disaster — a fire, flood, storm, or evacuation — in the right order: safety and people first, then documenting for insurance and aid, then the immediate recovery steps, without missing the things that cost money or health later. Use when someone says 'my house flooded/burned', 'what do I do after the disaster', 'we just evacuated, now what', or 'the storm damaged everything'. Produces a triaged action plan (safety → document → claim → recover), the do-not-miss list, and where to get help. Not legal advice; routes to emergency services and official aid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify the tracing, metrics, and alerting for an AI agent or LLM feature in production. Use when asked what to log for an LLM app, design agent tracing or spans, define quality and cost monitors, or answer 'how do we know if the agent is misbehaving?'. Produces an observability spec with a trace schema, metric definitions with owners and alert thresholds, sampling and retention policy, and a privacy note for logged content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a PRD for an AI-powered feature, covering the things normal PRDs miss. Use when asked to spec an AI/LLM feature, write a PRD for a feature that uses a model, or plan an AI capability (assistant, summarizer, generator, classifier). Produces an AI feature PRD — problem & UX of uncertainty, model approach, eval criteria, guardrails, fallback behaviour, the data flywheel, and cost/latency budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JLCPCB PCB fabrication and assembly — BOM/CPL generation, basic vs extended parts, assembly constraints, design rules, ordering workflow. Use with KiCad for JLCPCB manufacturing. Use this skill when the user mentions JLCPCB, wants to order PCBs or assembled boards, needs prototype bare PCBs and stencils, wants to know JLCPCB design rules and capabilities, or is asking about PCB manufacturing costs or turnaround times. For gerber/CPL export, stencil ordering, and BOM management, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise inline. Ad-hoc 2+ tasks without a plan use dispatching-parallel-agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure-as-code specialist for multi-cloud provisioning using Terraform across any provider (AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle Cloud). Use for terraform plan/apply, state management, compute, databases, storage, networking, IAM, OIDC, cost optimization, policy-as-code, ISO/IEC 42001 AI controls, ISO 22301 continuity, and ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 architecture documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether tests earn their maintenance cost and which suite owns each contract. Use when pruning redundant tests, investigating implementation coupling or test-only production hooks, reviewing the value of proposed coverage, or auditing an entire subsystem. Use write-tests to implement the resulting test changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multi-step work across services the user has authorized through Aident Loadout, using live action schemas, connection checks, cost preflight, and explicit approval for side effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

成本感知 LLM 管道，根据任务复杂度选择合适模型， 管理上下文预算，避免在长会话末尾做大型重构。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive one accepted change through implementation and checks to done, with one fresh review only where a mistake is costly. Use when: selected by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JLCPCB PCB fabrication and assembly — BOM/CPL generation, basic vs extended parts, assembly constraints, design rules, ordering workflow. Use with KiCad for JLCPCB manufacturing. Use this skill when the user mentions JLCPCB, wants to order PCBs or assembled boards, needs prototype bare PCBs and stencils, wants to know JLCPCB design rules and capabilities, or is asking about PCB manufacturing costs or turnaround times. For gerber/CPL export, stencil ordering, and BOM management, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript needs a framework that maps reduced-form estimates into a welfare, cost-benefit, or distributional policy object — sufficient statistics, MVPF, optimal-policy, or a small applied model. Builds the estimate-to-welfare bridge and states its assumptions; it does not run the empirical estimation or write the prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing ACM CCS experiments, attack demonstrations, adaptive-attack defense evaluations, security measurements, baselines, overhead and cost reporting, ablations, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on evidence that survives an adversarial program committee rather than leaderboard wins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical short-form-ad audio mix in one FFmpeg pass. VO loudnorm + 3.0× per-clip + 2.0× mix, music 0.13 base + apad+afade, sidechain compress 20:1 @ 0.01, climax line +20%, optional video-to-music duration sync. Replaces the reactive multi-round tuning that cost v03 6+ passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。