1,134 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run Claude Code in autonomous iteration loops until task completion — PRD-based feature development, test coverage improvement, lint fixing, documentation generation, dataset creation, or framework migrations. Uses in-session loop mechanism with specialized templates. Triggers on autonomous loop, iterate until done, run until passing, keep going until, ralph, PRD execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically gather comprehensive travel itinerary requirements through structured discovery questions, MCP-powered research (Perplexity, Exa), and expert detail gathering. Use when users request travel planning, itinerary creation, or trip assistance requiring deep research and personalized requirements gathering. Outputs detailed requirements specification with day-by-day itineraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit images with precision using ImageMagick 7, sips, transparent-background, and Pillow — with intelligent routing to AI semantic editing (Gemini/nano-banana-pro) for content-aware operations. Covers cropping, resizing, compositing, annotating, format conversion, color adjustment, background removal, batch processing, and montage creation. Triggers on image editing, crop, resize, composite, annotate, remove background, format conversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-configuring content creation pipeline with geo-lint validation. On first use, scans your project to learn its framework, content schema, categories, and authors, then creates SEO & GEO-optimized content matched to your brand voice. Validates every piece with geo-lint's 92 rules until zero violations. Triggers on: "content-creator", "create content", "write blog", "new post", "content calendar", "brand voice", "content strategy".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UX/マーケティング向けのユーザーペルソナを、5つの専門エージェントチームで作成するスキル。 ペルソナ設計、ユーザーリサーチ、ナラティブ執筆、バイアスレビュー、データ検証の 5観点からペルソナをディスカッション型で議論・作成し、Markdownドキュメントとして出力する。 data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 コンテキストファイルで過去のセッションを引き継げる。 Use when: ユーザーペルソナを作りたい、ターゲットユーザーを定義したい、 ペルソナシートを作成したい、UXリサーチ用のペルソナが必要、 マーケティング用のターゲット分析をしたい。 Triggers: "ペルソナ", "persona", "ターゲットユーザー", "target user", "ユーザー像", "ユーザー定義", "user profile", "ペルソナシート", "ターゲット分析", "ユーザーセグメント", "customer profile"
Contribute to OpenClaw ecosystem projects (OpenClaw, NemoClaw, NanoClaw) through a structured 9-step workflow: target verification, codebase exploration, parallel audit, finding cross-reference, and pull request creation. Emphasizes false positive prevention and project convention adherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an organisation for regulatory inspection by assessing readiness against agency-specific focus areas (FDA, EMA, MHRA). Covers warning letter and 483 theme analysis, mock inspection protocols, document bundle preparation, inspection logistics, and response template creation. Use when a regulatory inspection has been announced or is anticipated, when a periodic self-assessment is due, when new systems have been implemented since the last inspection, or after a significant audit finding that may attract regulatory attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Release a new version of an R package including version bumping, NEWS.md updates, git tagging, GitHub release creation, and post-release development version setup. Use when a package is ready for a new patch, minor, or major release, after CRAN acceptance to create the corresponding GitHub release, or when setting up the development version bump immediately after a release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the viz pipeline to render icons from existing glyphs. Entry point for the viz subproject covering palette generation, data building, manifest creation, and icon rendering for skills, agents, and teams. Always use build.sh as the pipeline entry point — never call Rscript directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement electronic signatures compliant with 21 CFR Part 11 Subpart C and EU Annex 11. Covers signature manifestation (signer, date/time, meaning), signature-to-record binding, biometric vs non-biometric controls, policy creation, and user certification requirements. Use when a computerized system requires legally binding electronic signatures for GxP records, when replacing wet-ink signatures in regulated workflows, when implementing batch release or document approval workflows, or when a regulatory gap reveals missing signature controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Alluvial gold recovery using panning, sluicing, and classification. Covers site reading (geological indicators, stream dynamics, pay streak location), panning technique, sluice box operation, and responsible extraction practices. Use when prospecting in an area with known or suspected alluvial gold deposits, sampling a stream to test for gold presence, maximizing recovery during recreational panning, or assessing a site's gold potential before investing more effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy Shiny applications to shinyapps.io, Posit Connect, or Docker containers. Covers rsconnect configuration, manifest generation, Dockerfile creation, and deployment verification. Use when publishing a Shiny app for external or internal users, moving from local development to a hosted environment, containerizing a Shiny app for Kubernetes or Docker deployment, or setting up automated deployment pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a new agent-almanac workflow — a self-contained `.mjs` orchestration script run by Claude Code's Workflow tool. Covers choosing a workflow over a team, copying the template, the triple-name discovery contract, the pure-literal meta and sidecar frontmatter, building the body with the injected primitives, the advisory/implementing capability contract, the adversarial-verification fail-safes, validation, and manual installation. Use when you have a repeatable, parameterized procedure that coordinates several agents and want it captured as a reusable, auditable artifact whose control flow is fixed in code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new agent definition file following the agent-almanac agent template and registry conventions. Covers persona design, tool selection, skill assignment, model choice, frontmatter schema, required sections, registry integration, and discovery symlink verification. Use when adding a new specialized agent to the library, defining a persona for a Claude Code subagent, or creating a domain-specific assistant with curated skills and tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured GitHub issue creation from review findings or task breakdowns. Groups related findings into logical issues, applies labels, and produces issues with standard templates including summary, findings, and acceptance criteria. Designed to consume output from review-codebase or similar review skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new team composition file following the agent-almanac team template and registry conventions. Covers team purpose definition, member selection, coordination pattern choice, task decomposition design, machine-readable configuration block, registry integration, and README automation. Use when defining a multi-agent workflow, composing agents for a complex review process, or creating a coordinated group for recurring collaborative tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create production-ready Grafana dashboards with reusable panels, template variables, annotations, and provisioning for version-controlled dashboard deployment. Use when creating visual representations of Prometheus, Loki, or other data source metrics, building operational dashboards for SRE teams, migrating from manual dashboard creation to version-controlled provisioning, or establishing executive-level SLO compliance reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize a worktree-based repo layout for parallel development. Creates a main worktree, a reviews worktree for PR reviews, and N numbered work branches. Handles .env creation, dependency installation, and branchlet config. TRIGGER when user asks to set up the repo from scratch, initialize worktrees, bootstrap their dev environment, "setup repo", "setup worktrees", "initialize dev environment", "set up branches", or when a freshly cloned repo has no sibling worktrees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a human explicitly asks to commit and push to the checked-out branch, including directly to the default branch, with no branch creation and no pull request. Not for a feature branch off the default: use commit-push-pr in its no-PR mode.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants one-time repository setup for tracker, triage labels, and domain conventions. Not for ongoing triage, issue creation, or multi-repo setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user needs to measure fuzz corpus coverage, explain a coverage plateau, or turn uncovered regions into campaign work. Not for harness creation: use fuzz-harness-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to identify and bypass checksums, nondeterminism, or validation barriers that block fuzzing coverage. Not for dictionary creation: use fuzzing-dictionary. Local writes only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。