「dating」の検索結果

Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for publishing skills and agents to the dotnet-skills Claude Code marketplace. Covers adding new content, updating plugin.json, validation, and release tagging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating LLM text classification: codebook, learning regime and model choice, prompts, validation against human coding (kappa, F1), hybrid review, measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline. Use to classify, code, or label text at scale; category discovery goes to topic-modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when converting an agentic repository into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin or when building, repairing, validating, packaging, submitting, publishing, or auditing an existing Plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-verify Claude-generated plans and code using OpenAI Codex and Google Gemini CLI. Provides code review, plan validation, and comparative analysis. Use when needing second opinions on Claude's code or plans, validating technical decisions, or seeking consensus from multiple AI models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Branch skill for building and improving agents. Use when creating new agents, adapting marketplace agents, validating agent structure, writing system prompts, or improving existing agents. Triggers: 'create agent', 'improve agent', 'validate agent', 'fix agent', 'agent frontmatter', 'system prompt', 'adapt agent', 'customize agent', 'agent examples', 'agent tools'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardized reference documentation section structure for agents - project guidance, conventions, related agents, and Skills. Use when implementing or updating agent documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for authoring specialized AI agents. Use when creating, updating, or improving agents, choosing models, defining focus areas, configuring tools, or learning agent best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

go-authcrunch source code management and commit message rules. Use when creating, reviewing, or updating commit messages, especially when the user asks to create a commit message for a change in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import information from foreign sources into a set of artifact kinds (the target), generating or updating them to reflect the imported information. Use when the user wants to "import", "ingest", or "bring in" external sources like files, URLs, or pasted text into artifacts like SPEC, CODE, DOCS, TASK, INFR, or OTHR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the postmortem for an incident, in its incident channel, once it is mitigated or resolved. Use on "write up this incident", "postmortem", "incident summary", "what happened here for people who weren't around", "draft the retro", or when the oncall memory says incidents of this severity get one. Reads the incident channel (and the alert thread it came from), the investigation findings and the data behind them, and writes a one-screen, zero-context write-up: what happened, impact with numbers, detection, timeline with durations, why it happened, what fixed it, follow-ups with proposed owners, and one before/during/after chart. Posted and pinned in the incident channel as its final pinned post, with edit requests updating that one pinned post in place — unless the person or the team's conventions say write-ups live elsewhere, in which case it is written there and only a link is posted, nothing pinned. A person edits and publishes it; never assigns blame.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when editing Qwik's .ruler guidance, adding or changing rules or skills, keeping AI guidance from going stale, updating assistant setup docs, or answering how Ruler should generate assistant-native guidance, skills, config, or policy for this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and maintain the system recap block in a PR description - a GitHub-rendered visual summary of which system primitives a change touches, how risky it is, and what changed. Prefer mermaid sequence diagrams for the change; pick another graph type when it explains the diff better. Use when planning a non-trivial change (plan mode), when creating or updating a pull request (recap mode), or when the user asks for a visual recap, visual plan, system review, or PR recap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing competitors, creating sales battlecards, building competitive positioning, preparing for competitive deals, or updating competitive intelligence. Triggers: 'battlecard for [competitor]', 'competitive analysis of [competitor]', 'how do we beat [competitor]', 'compare us to [competitor]', 'competitive intel', 'win against [competitor]'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Perigon documentation work across this workspace, especially Perigon.docs/Content/docs/Perigon bilingual and versioned docs, syncing zh-CN and en-US content, updating docs from Perigon.CLI, Perigon.template, and Perigon.Modules changes, and deciding whether to revise existing pages or add new documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with Linear.app for issue tracking. Use when working with Linear tickets (format ABC-123), creating issues, updating status, or downloading attachments. Triggers on ticket references, issue management, or when user mentions Linear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for handling commands, validating input, and filtering messages in XMTP agents. Use when implementing slash commands, validators, or message filters. Triggers on command handling, input validation, or type guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-knowledge for stella, the self-hosted AI assistant. Use when users ask about configuration, setup, onboarding, providers, models, agents, channels, webhooks, memory, schedules, workflows, goals, workers, skills, plugins, session compaction, notifications, self-update, multi-user behavior, or how stella works. Also use for changing models, setting up channels or webhooks, configuring providers, updating stella, onboarding, switching agents, reporting bugs, and goal status or acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses htmltest to crawl generated documentation or static site output, detect broken internal and external links, and return a link-focused validation report before deploy. This is a narrow docs QA skill for agents validating already-built HTML, not a generic site generator or crawler listing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use GBrain to give OpenClaw or Hermes-style agents a local knowledge brain with markdown ingestion, entity links, hybrid search, scheduled consolidation, and MCP access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert product discovery guidance for user research and problem validation. Use when conducting user interviews, validating problems, applying jobs-to-be-done framework, sizing opportunities, customer segmentation, competitive analysis, prototype testing, usability testing, designing surveys, or synthesizing research insights. Covers discovery sprints, continuous discovery, and research operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。