Create AI avatar videos with precise control over avatars, voices, scripts, scenes, and backgrounds using HeyGen's v2 API. Use when: (1) Choosing a specific avatar and voice for a video, (2) Writing exact scripts for an avatar to speak, (3) Building multi-scene videos with different backgrounds per scene, (4) Creating transparent WebM videos for compositing, (5) Using talking photos as video presenters, (6) Integrating HeyGen avatars with Remotion, (7) Batch video generation with exact specs, (8) Brand-consistent production videos with precise control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
calesthio/OpenMontage☆ 6.9万2026年10月13日 更新
Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
heygen-com/hyperframes☆ 6.4万2026年10月15日 更新
Fix newly added optional parameters, optional React props, and optional type/interface members in Remotion monorepo diffs by converting internal APIs to required nullable values and updating call sites. Use when a PR, review, or user asks to forbid new `foo?: T` / `param?: T` additions except for exported or documented public APIs where requiring the value would be breaking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
remotion-dev/remotion☆ 6.4万2026年10月15日 更新
Browser QA of a PR against a running Twenty app, post-merge on main or pre-merge via the qa-scout label. Derives user-visible scenarios from the PR diff, executes them with the Playwright MCP browser, attests database effects over SQL, watches server and worker logs for swallowed errors, and writes a structured verdict plus a report. Invoked by ci-e2e-main.yaml after the deterministic e2e suite; also runnable locally against a dev stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
twentyhq/twenty☆ 5.8万2026年10月15日 更新
When the user wants to create, generate, edit, or optimize images for marketing — blog heroes, social graphics, product mockups, profile banners, listing visuals, or brand assets. Also use when the user mentions 'AI image generation,' 'generate an image,' 'create a graphic,' 'product mockup,' 'hero image,' 'social media graphic,' 'banner image,' 'cover photo,' 'profile banner,' 'listing screenshot,' 'Flux,' 'Flux Kontext,' 'Midjourney,' 'DALL-E,' 'GPT Image,' 'ChatGPT Images,' 'Ideogram,' 'Gemini image,' 'Nano Banana,' 'Recraft,' 'Stable Diffusion,' 'Canva,' 'Figma,' 'image optimization,' 'compress images,' 'WebP,' or 'OG image.' Use this for general-purpose marketing image creation and optimization. For paid ad image creative and platform-specific ad specs, see ad-creative. For video production, see video.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
coreyhaines31/marketingskills☆ 5.5万2026年10月15日 更新
When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," "building many pages for SEO," "pSEO," "generate 100 pages," "data-driven pages," "templated landing pages," or "which CMS for pSEO." Use this whenever someone wants to create many similar pages targeting different keywords or locations. For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit. For content strategy planning, see content-strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
coreyhaines31/marketingskills☆ 5.5万2026年10月15日 更新
Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD☆ 5.4万2026年10月15日 更新
Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD☆ 5.4万2026年10月15日 更新
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD☆ 5.4万2026年10月15日 更新
Inspect, validate, edit, lint, diff, batch-manage, and deploy Live2D Cubism models (.model3.json) from the command line.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HKUDS/CLI-Anything☆ 5.3万2026年9月22日 更新
Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks, React/UI conventions, and tests. Review depth adapts to diff size and runtime subagent capability (single-agent or multi-agent reviewer-verifier). Report-only by default; code fixes and GitHub submission each require explicit invocation-time authorization (`fix` / `submit`). Normal-review prompts and safe interruption behavior follow the interaction contract below. To diagnose gaps in the skill after a review session, run `/gh-pr-review diag`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CherryHQ/cherry-studio☆ 5.3万2026年10月15日 更新
Tracks physical units and propagates measurement uncertainty in scientific calculations using pint and uncertainties. Use for unit conversion and dimensional checking, GUM uncertainty budgets, Type A and Type B evaluation, coverage factors and expanded uncertainty, Monte Carlo propagation, significant-figure and plus-minus reporting, error propagation through curve fits, CODATA constants, auditing Python code for stripped units or broken uncertainty propagation, and order-of-magnitude plausibility checks using dimensionless groups (Reynolds, Peclet, Damkohler, Knudsen, Biot, Womersley), characteristic scales such as diffusion time or Debye length, and observed magnitude ranges. Trigger on "is this number physically reasonable", "sanity check these units", "what regime is this flow in", or a result that looks off by orders of magnitude.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Fits probabilistic models for single-cell omics, including scVI batch integration, scANVI annotation, totalVI CITE-seq, MultiVI RNA/ATAC integration, and posterior differential expression. Use for generative modeling, reference mapping, multimodal analysis, or model-based uncertainty; use scanpy for standard preprocessing and exploratory analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Performs pathway and gene-set enrichment analysis on gene lists or ranked gene data and interprets the results. Used when the user has a set of genes (differentially expressed genes from PyDESeq2/Scanpy, CRISPR-screen hits, cluster marker genes, proteomics hits) and wants to know which biological pathways, GO terms, or gene sets are over-represented or enriched. Covers over-representation analysis (ORA / Enrichr / Fisher / hypergeometric), ranked Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA / preranked), single-sample scoring (ssGSEA/GSVA), and functional profiling via gseapy, g:Profiler, Enrichr libraries, MSigDB, GO, KEGG, Reactome, and WikiPathways — plus gene-ID mapping, choosing the right background universe, multiple-testing correction, redundancy reduction, dotplots/enrichment maps, and publication-ready tables. Use this for "pathway analysis", "enrichment analysis", "GO enrichment", "KEGG/Reactome pathways", "GSEA", "over-representation", "functional annotation", or "what pathways are my genes in".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Performs bulk RNA-seq differential expression analysis with PyDESeq2, including count validation, formula designs, explicit contrasts, Wald tests, FDR correction, coefficient-matched LFC shrinkage, and result visualization. Use for PyDESeq2 or Python DESeq2 workflows with biological replicates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Builds and differentiates PennyLane quantum circuits, hybrid PyTorch or JAX models, molecular VQE and QAOA workflows. Use for variational quantum algorithms, quantum machine learning, simulator validation, and moving validated circuits to provider plugins. For hardware-specific compilation use qiskit or cirq; for open-system dynamics use qutip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Structures a multi-perspective council exercise for decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Simulates thinking archetypes, separates evidence from assumptions and values, and synthesizes a conditional recommendation. Use when the user requests a council, panel, devil's advocate analysis, "mind council", or deliberate comparison of perspectives on a difficult choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Google quantum computing framework. Use when targeting Google Quantum AI hardware, designing noise-aware circuits, or running quantum characterization experiments. Best for Google hardware, noise modeling, and low-level circuit design. For IBM hardware use qiskit; for quantum ML with autodiff use pennylane; for physics simulations use qutip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Prepares bulk RNA-seq FASTQ, Salmon, STAR or featureCounts output for gene-level differential expression. Covers nf-core/rnaseq and standalone quantification, biological replication, strandedness, reference provenance, validated count assembly and a PyDESeq2 handoff. Use for FASTQ-to-counts analysis, nf-core/rnaseq configuration, STAR/Salmon quantification, or building a counts matrix for DESeq2. For single-cell data use scanpy; for statistical fitting alone use pydeseq2.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills☆ 5万2026年10月12日 更新
Review code changes with GitNexus from a GitHub PR URL or number, a branch/ref or commit range, or local staged, unstaged, and untracked changes. Use when the user asks for a code review, merge-risk assessment, regression hunt, missing-test analysis, or a verdict on whether a PR, branch, commit range, or local diff is safe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus☆ 4.8万2026年10月15日 更新
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills☆ 4.8万2026年10月15日 更新
Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills☆ 4.8万2026年10月15日 更新
Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. ) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just "ChatGPT but different" - products that solve specific problems with AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills☆ 4.8万2026年10月15日 更新
Replace the manual commit-by-commit classification step in `breeze release-management prepare-provider-documentation` with AI-driven classification. For each provider with pending changes, analyze every PR (batched into one sub-agent per provider, not one per PR), pay special attention to potentially breaking changes by inspecting the actual diff, scope multi-provider PRs to the current provider's slice, ask the release manager when uncertain, and apply version bumps + changelog entries. Use during the regular provider release cycle as an alternative to the interactive breeze prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
apache/airflow☆ 4.7万2026年10月15日 更新