2,692 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Diagnose failing GitHub Actions runs from bounded run, job, and step evidence, propose a focused fix, and modify the local checkout only when the requested task includes implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess release health from Sentry errors, regressions, affected users, crash evidence, and comparison with the previous stable release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a Sentry issue from bounded event, stack, tag, environment, release, and timeline evidence before proposing a code change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or redesign enterprise AI, automation, security, and operations product pages that explain system boundaries, approvals, auditability, exceptions, and rollback. Use for dark cinematic heroes, hairline grids, metric pauses, expandable solution rows, case-study evidence, security proof, and qualified demo or waitlist handoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a playable browser game end to end with deterministic fixtures and real browser evidence. Use for gameplay QA, regression testing, controls, accessibility, responsive/mobile testing, save flows, console checks, performance smoke tests, and release verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit websites, apps, screenshots, mockups, and design code for harmful AI-design clichés, generic generated defaults, and established UI defects. Use when the user wants evidence-backed design feedback, an anti-slop review, or a removal-first cleanup plan without a speculative redesign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture or repair reliable full-page screenshots for lazy-loaded, scroll-animated, Framer, WebGL/canvas, or reveal-heavy web pages. Use when full-page screenshots are blank, gray, white, sparse, show a tiny content strip, disagree with a working scroll video, or when article evidence/section crops must be derived from a trustworthy full-page image.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, rewrite, review, or continuously refine X/Twitter posts in Meng To's current voice using his deduplicated authored-post corpus, personal and product context, shared resources, and Content repo evidence. Use when asked to improve a tweet in Meng's tone, draft an original post, reply, thread, resource share, or quote post as Meng, check whether an angle repeats an earlier post, study Meng's writing style, ingest another 20-50 authored posts, or hone the reusable Meng X voice profile.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit work, verify claims with concrete evidence, and explain the result in simple grade-5 language. Use when the user asks to review, audit, check, verify, explain a change, explain a fix, summarize test results, validate whether something works, or translate technical findings into plain language for non-technical readers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internet Court adapter for GenLayer Intelligent Contract supervision. Use to specify agent-performance rubrics, evidence schemas, decision outputs, and ERC-7710 connector expectations, while delegating actual GenLayer contract writing, linting, testing, deployment, and CLI interaction to the official GenLayer skills at https://skills.genlayer.com/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, deploy, and monitor a GenLayer Intelligent Oracle prediction market from any coding agent. Use when a user wants to create a settled-by-web-evidence prediction market without opening the web UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when a developer explicitly asks to clean, prune, tidy, or organize DeepChat SDD documentation after implementation and validation. Scans docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture; prefers multi-agent review when available; removes completed issue docs when a linked GitHub issue is closed or implementation and validation evidence proves the bug no longer exists, drops stale plans and legacy task files from completed feature or architecture goals, and deletes obsolete feature or architecture docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for `/loopx-pr-review` or evidence-backed PR queue review. Run `loopx pr-review` first, execute the capability-owned review plan for each selected exact head, then publish full bilingual PR reviews (complete Chinese five-block review plus one concise English verdict) that match the verified findings. Use `loopx-pr-merge` for approval or merge actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional maintainer workflow for the approval, merge-readiness, or authorized self-merge decision on a LoopX pull request. Requires the exact-head review evidence from `loopx pr-review`. Review depth, verdicts, review comments, and the published review format belong to loopx-pr-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a LoopX worker is operating an auto-research lane, demo pane, frontier item, evidence packet, promotion/retirement decision, or visible tmux/Codex auto-research rehearsal. Identity must come from the LoopX role profile and quota/frontier packet; this skill only provides role-specific execution checklists, artifact contracts, and stop conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate intermittent Pinot test failures in GitHub Actions and report evidence and likely causes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when checking whether a Proofpack release candidate has complete local evidence before packaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a project or library of skills for metadata, trigger boundaries, workflow completion criteria, local resource closure, instruction economy, tool scope, effort, and routing evidence. Use before shipping skills, after importing a skill collection, or when a skill triggers too often or not at all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a reviewable GitHub pull request from the current branch with a Conventional Commits title, a concise evidence-based body, and before/after screenshots for UI changes. Use when asked to open, create, publish, or prepare a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Nexent requirements and bugfixes through SPEC acceptance, traditional UT and applicable D1-D5 test design, product/test implementation, local verification, and delivery evidence. Use for features, fixes, refactors and post-development test backfill across APIs, UI, model and Agent behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route C# and .NET requests to the exact installed specialist or smallest dotnet/skills marketplace plugin. USE FOR: "which specialist should own this" or "how do I add the skill" requests involving ASP.NET Core endpoints, Blazor, MAUI binding, Windows Forms specialist selection or installation, EF Core queries, test or framework migration, runtime CPU/allocation evidence, file-based C#, editor/compiler defects, a surviving MSBuild `.binlog`, or a plugin missing from `/skills`; also use for C# semantics when no narrower specialist exists. DO NOT USE FOR: requests that already name the exact installed specialist to invoke, or work unrelated to C# or .NET.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find caller-visible production changes existing tests would miss through pseudo-mutation analysis; verify candidates or close gaps only when requested. Includes read-only per-test composition for grading. Polyglot. USE FOR: would tests catch a bug, behavioral blind spots, surviving mutations. DO NOT USE FOR: concrete fix/feature revision proof (test-value-evidence); suite taxonomy (test-tagging); .NET coverage, Cobertura, plateaus or coverage-backed priorities (coverage-analysis); named CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; mutation tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。