「facts」の検索結果

Institutional-grade equity research skills for AI agents. 80 Claude-type skills across 14 verticals (equity-research-core, models-and-pitches, bio-pharm, scenarios, quantitative-analysis, idea-generation, options-derivatives, business-intelligence, industry-analysis, macro-strategy, portfolio-strategy, technical-analysis, risk-and-psychology, trading-as-business) powered by agentii.ai's agent-use-ready SEC filing data plane — SEC filings and 15K+ earnings call transcripts, 15.99M XBRL facts, and company profiles for 1,146+ US-public-equity tickers. Features the three-layer retrieval protocol (Document Discovery → Page Map → Deep Read, with deep-outline escalation) — measured, not asserted: 97.5% saved against a sequential read, and the page map itself is 10.0% of one (spec 062 T030, 2026-09-23) — server-side parallel multi-period search via search_cross_period, a full Excel/PPT generation pipeline with 3-tier office backend support, and the spec-046 governance layer (constitution, thesis and single-skill modes, mechanical gates, and a template-owned disclaimer on generated reports).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when enhancing, upscaling, restoring, denoising, sharpening, deinterlacing, stabilizing, motion-deblurring, colorizing, SDR-to-HDR converting, or frame-rate/slow-motion converting video (and secondarily images) with Topaz Labs — whether cleaning up AI-generated video, compressed UGC, or old archival footage, or building a generate-low-res-then-upscale delivery pipeline. Covers choosing the right named Topaz model for a specific footage problem, setting parameters, driving the Topaz Platform (Video/Image) REST API's async job lifecycle, judging when enhancement helps versus when it introduces artifacts (over-smoothing, temporal shimmer, face hallucination), and QA of enhanced output. Do not use for originating new video content, non-Topaz upscalers, or purely editorial cuts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production realtime voice agents with Hume's Empathic Voice Interface (EVI): speech-to-speech sessions, empathic/prosodic response design, EVI 3 versus EVI 4-mini selection, WebSocket and SDK integration, tools/function calling, interruption/barge-in, turn-taking, transcripts/audio artifacts, pricing/limits, privacy, safety, consent, and QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce, direct, integrate, and quality-control ElevenLabs text-to-speech for narration, character performance, multilingual media, long-form voiceover, and streamed or batch AI-content audio. Use when selecting ElevenLabs models or voices; preparing spoken text; controlling pronunciation, pacing, emotion, and code-switching; using TTS APIs; cloning or designing a voice with consent; repairing artifacts; mastering deliverables; or evaluating generated speech. Excludes music, sound-effect generation, conversational-agent design, and general speech recognition except transcription used to verify TTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate AudioShake's cloud source-separation service (developer.audioshake.ai) to split a recording into stems. Use when a task involves isolating vocals, drums, bass, guitar, piano, keys, strings, or winds from music; separating dialogue / music / effects (DME) for film-TV post-production, localization, and dubbing; splitting a mixed recording into one stem per speaker; lyric transcription or word-level alignment; music detection/identification; or speech denoise/dereverb. Covers the Tasks API job lifecycle (assets, targets, formats, polling vs webhooks, credits, limits), choosing which stem targets a production actually needs, reviewing separated stems for bleed / artifacts / transient smearing / phase problems and repairing them, the rights and consent questions raised by separating copyrighted or third-party recordings, and the decision boundary for when a local open model such as Demucs is the better route than the API. Not for generating or synthesizing new audio, mixing, or mastering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select, integrate, and operate multi-model image-generation gateways with model-specific schema discovery, version policy, asynchronous jobs, webhooks, spend approval, safe inputs and artifacts, data-governance review, and billing observability. Use for comparing or building against fal.ai, Replicate, or Together AI image APIs, including controlled failover; do not use for direct model-provider APIs, local inference, training, dedicated endpoint provisioning, video generation, or general image editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent color grading and finishing direction for generated video, ads, trailers, product films, social clips, explainers, and mixed-source edits. Use when planning, directing, reviewing, or QAing color correction, shot matching, exposure, contrast, saturation, skin/product color protection, look development, LUT/reference use, SDR/HDR color management, delivery constraints, generated-media artifacts, editor/compositor handoff, and finishing QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects allele-specific transcription factor or histone modification binding from heterozygous-variant ChIP-seq using WASP (reference-bias filter; mandatory upstream), RASQUAL (joint QTL + bias-corrected testing), BaalChIP (Bayesian beta-binomial with copy-number-aware overdispersion), and AlleleSeq (personalized diploid genome). Handles imprinted-locus awareness, X-inactivation artifacts, cancer copy-number imbalance, and integration with downstream caQTL / bQTL mapping. Use when identifying variants with allelic effects on TF binding, fine-mapping causal regulatory variants, validating deep-learning variant predictions, or characterizing cis-acting regulatory effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPR and BLI assay planning, kinetic interpretation, and troubleshooting guidance. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or modifying generator scripts that write files; keeps generated artifacts out of docs/ and aligns script defaults with ownership paths plus CI gate updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create evidence-aware, interactive visual explainers as self-contained offline HTML. Use when a user asks to explain a concept, repository module, engineering tradeoff, or incident with a diagram, walkthrough, ELI5 treatment, data/request trace, failure view, or teach-back. Do not use for a plain short answer, ordinary prose rewrite, generic website implementation, or unsupported claims presented as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated patterns from QA reports, bug reports, test summaries, status updates, and quality communications. Detects and rewrites robotic test-result language, template-sounding status updates, inflated severity descriptions, and generic stakeholder reports — without inventing facts. Makes QA writing sound like a real engineer wrote it. Use when: "humanize report," "rewrite QA summary," "fix test report," "make this sound human," "clean up status update." Not for: general prose, blog, or marketing-copy cleanup — use the global humanizer skill. Not for: classifying or routing CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: ai-bug-triage, qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture durable, project-specific learnings from the work just done into the knowledge/ base — gotchas, implementation quirks, things looked up or web-searched, live-API behaviours, and design decisions (as ADRs). Use before opening a PR (it runs automatically in /deliver), or any time you've learned something worth remembering. Records only non-obvious, reusable facts; skips anything already in the repo, CLAUDE.md, or git history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about the AI SDK and help build AI-powered features. Use when developers: (1) Ask about AI SDK functions like generateText, streamText, ToolLoopAgent, embed, or tools, (2) Want to build AI agents, chatbots, RAG systems, or text generation features, (3) Have questions about AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.), streaming, tool calling, structured output, or embeddings, (4) Use React hooks like useChat or useCompletion. Triggers on: "AI SDK", "Vercel AI SDK", "generateText", "streamText", "add AI to my app", "build an agent", "tool calling", "structured output", "useChat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。