「feedback」の検索結果

Human modification of Earth's systems and the geographic dimensions of environmental change. Covers climate change science (greenhouse effect, feedback loops, projections), deforestation and land use change, desertification and soil degradation, water resource management, biodiversity loss and conservation geography, pollution and environmental justice, and sustainability frameworks. Use when reasoning about human impacts on the environment, environmental policy, conservation planning, climate adaptation, or the spatial distribution of environmental risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when skillsaw reports a likely false positive, misses an edge case, behaves incorrectly, or needs an RFE. Gather a safe report and, only with explicit user permission, create a feedback bundle or open a GitHub issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Follow up on open PRs in skillsaw — fix failing CI, address reviewer feedback, push updates, and validate backward compatibility. Use when an open PR needs maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brutally honest code review in the style of Linus Torvalds, focusing on data structures, simplicity, and pragmatism. Use when you want critical, no-nonsense feedback that prioritizes engineering fundamentals over style preferences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code review covering style, readability, and security concerns with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests or merge requests to identify issues and suggest improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CatColab Causal Loop Diagrams - systems dynamics modeling with reinforcing (R) and balancing (B) feedback loops, delays, and Lotka-Volterra semantics for strategic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' 'copy sweep,' 'tighten this up,' 'this reads awkwardly,' 'clean up this text,' 'too wordy,' or 'sharpen the messaging.' Use this when the user already has copy and wants it improved rather than rewritten from scratch. For writing new copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and address review feedback on GitHub PRs, GitLab MRs, or in conversation. Use when checking new reviews, responding to comments, rechecking after a push, or following up on approvals and change requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix actionable in-scope findings in the current Incan worktree, usually after /review. Use when the user asks to fix review findings, clean up reported issues, apply in-scope review feedback, or says /fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, debugging, or giving feedback on Go code in this repo (exercises/part2, website/tools, or any *.go file) or when asked for a "code review", "review this Go", "revisa este código Go", or "crítica de código". Reviews for correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, performance, and security, and always ends with a test-thinking pass (what a test would catch). For exercises/part2, prefer the go-exercise-reviewer skill which knows the module-mode quirk; this skill covers general Go anywhere in the repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

act is an open-source CLI tool that runs GitHub Actions workflows locally using Docker, enabling fast feedback on workflow changes without pushing to GitHub. It is a standard tool for local Actions development and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert support operations guidance for customer service excellence. Use when designing ticket management systems, creating SLA policies, building support tier structures (L1/L2/L3), optimizing knowledge bases, defining severity levels and escalation procedures, implementing support metrics (CSAT, FRT, TTR, FCR), configuring support tool stacks, or building support-to-CS feedback loops. Covers Zendesk, Intercom, Freshdesk, and help desk best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OctoClaw is the TypeScript-first policy, delegation, status, and operator layer for OpenClaw. Use it when a turn should be routed through reply/delegate policy, WorkContract-backed delegation, runtime status, IM delivery, or feedback-loop tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run clippy locally and report only issues in the current diff, matching the CI reviewdog flow. Use when asked how to lint changed code or get clippy feedback on a branch before pushing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'send this to my client', 'get feedback on this page', 'send a review link', 'what did the client say', or 'work through the review notes'. Sends a Murmur review link, reads the notes reviewers pin to the page, replies, applies each change on a duplicate, and resolves every note with the snapshot of the change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates roadshow scheduling with institutional investor targeting, presentation materials, and feedback tracking. Use when managing roadshows, organizing investor meetings, or tracking investor engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores and strengthens startup pitch decks (pre-seed through Series A) against 35 investor-grade criteria grounded in Sequoia, DocSend, YC, a16z, and Carta data. Use when the user has shared a pitch deck (PDF, PPTX, markdown, pasted slide text, or a link to one) and asks for a review, score, feedback, or critique. A full review takes about 15–25 minutes, 40 or more for a long investor deck, so for a general pitch question with no deck, answer briefly in chat and offer the review instead of starting it. When it runs, score with the rubric, never with deck advice from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feed actual task results back into agent memory for calibration. Compares predicted vs actual outcomes, records accuracy scores, and tracks estimation quality, prediction quality, and decision quality over time to improve future agent performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates commit messages against Conventional Commits specification using programmatic validation. Replaces the git-conventional-commit-messages text file with a tool that provides instant feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。