「gpt」の検索結果

查看本机进程的 Mihomo 实时代理链。当用户问 Claude、Codex、Gemini、ChatGPT、 浏览器或其他进程走哪个代理时使用。只读。Profile 拓扑和写入使用 clash-doctor， 出口 IP 质量使用 ip-check。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate images via Codex CLI's built-in image_gen tool (gpt-image-2). OAuth auth — no API key needed. Codex CLI의 내장 image_gen 도구로 이미지 생성. OAuth 인증으로 API 키 불필요. Usage: /codex-image cherry blossom hanok, /codex-image --size 1024x1536 space cat, /codex-image --quality high seoul night

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects 55 AI writing patterns and rewrites text in five voice profiles so it reads like a specific human wrote it, with an optional 0-100 AI-tell score. Use when text sounds AI-generated or like a chatbot, when preparing a blog post, README, or LinkedIn post for publication, when auditing prose for AI tells, or when editing a Markdown file in place. Triggers on phrases like "humanize this", "make this sound less AI", "make this sound human", "remove AI tells", "does this read like ChatGPT", and "rewrite so it does not sound AI-generated". Pure Markdown, zero dependencies, no network calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当 Agent 接到专业任务（编码/爬虫/文件操作/API调用/数据分析/文档/部署/推送等）时，强制先查记忆层和技能索引，有匹配必用、无匹配必搜、答复时自动推荐（排除已装）。用于防止 Agent 跳过技能直接硬扛通用能力。跨平台通用（WorkBuddy/Claude/ChatGPT/Cursor/Gemini 等 20+ 框架）。完整版本史见 CHANGELOG.md。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites AI-sounding text so it reads like a human wrote it. Use when the user says 'sounds like AI/ChatGPT,' 'too robotic,' or 'humanize this.' Fixes AI vocabulary, inflated significance, hedging, robotic rhythm, and formulaic structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview employees to identify recurring daily work, office workflows, and repetitive tasks that can be automated, co-piloted, or supported by AI. Use when the user wants to find what AI can take off their plate, map available tools such as ChatGPT/OpenAI, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Excel or PowerPoint add-ins, Google Workspace, no-code/RPA tools, coding agents, or internal automation platforms, and write tool-aware specs with fallback paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated writing patterns from rebuttal prose to make it sound natural, direct, and authentically human-authored. Use when a Stage 2 refined draft or Stage 4 follow-up response reads too formulaic, robotic, or "GPT-like". Supports academic English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect, verify, and troubleshoot Xquik's remote MCP server. Use when a user needs MCP setup, OAuth recovery, tool discovery, endpoint execution, or a connection check in ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, or another compatible client. Covers the endpoint, OAuth and the API key fallback, the docs, search, and execute tools with their inputs and outputs, errors, and the confirmation rules for private, metered, persistent, or state-changing calls. Not affiliated with X Corp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要在基础身份之上叠加可切换的人格风格层时调用此 skill。典型场景包括：为同一产品提供多种人格选项（如 GPT-5.1 的 friendly/professional/quirky 模式）、设计人格切换机制、防止人格泄露到用户内容中。 不适用于：定义 AI 的核心角色定位（应使用 persona-design）、设计安全规则（应使用 safety-guardrails）。 关键 trigger 信号：产品需要多种语气风格、用户可切换 AI 性格、需要防止 AI 人格污染用户文本、存在 "personality" 或 "tone" 配置项。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Xiaohongshu (XHS / RedNote) cover images using GPT Image 2 / Codex image generation first, with the legacy Gemini CLI as fallback. Triggers for cover generation: "生成封面", "小红书封面", "xhs封面", "制作封面", "帮我做张图", "XHS cover", "RedNote cover". Triggers for cover editing: "修改封面", "改一下封面", "上一张图基础上", "基于这张图调整", "不要重新做", "edit this cover". Triggers for style learning: "学习这个风格", "提取风格", "我想自定义风格", "这张图的风格", "learn this style", "extract style". Always trigger this skill when user mentions 小红书/XHS/RedNote together with 封面/cover/图片, OR when user uploads a reference image and asks about creating a similar style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Xiaohongshu (XHS / RedNote) cover images using GPT Image 2 / Codex image generation first, with the legacy Gemini CLI as fallback. Triggers for cover generation: "生成封面", "小红书封面", "xhs封面", "制作封面", "帮我做张图", "XHS cover", "RedNote cover". Triggers for cover editing: "修改封面", "改一下封面", "上一张图基础上", "基于这张图调整", "不要重新做", "edit this cover". Triggers for style learning: "学习这个风格", "提取风格", "我想自定义风格", "这张图的风格", "learn this style", "extract style". Always trigger this skill when user mentions 小红书/XHS/RedNote together with 封面/cover/图片, OR when user uploads a reference image and asks about creating a similar style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composite any two HTML screens into a locked photo plate of hands holding an open foldable phone — a 1448×1086 still with two blank 495×849 / 498×849 screen slots (left and right) — to make side-by-side meme and comparison videos: TikTok vs Reels, ChatGPT vs Claude, "me vs my friend", before/after, two apps racing. Trigger on: "foldable phone meme", "put X on the left screen and Y on the right", "two-screen comparison video", "the dual-screen phone meme", or any request that names two apps/feeds/chats to show at once. The plate, geometry, and camera are finished — the agent only authors what plays INSIDE the two screens and renders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing a Formax code handoff: selecting files, generating repomix bundles, and writing a high-quality prompt for WebGPT or another coding agent with clear constraints and validation scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue is an open-source AI code assistant for VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal (the cn CLI) that works with any LLM: Claude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama and other local models. Use when a user asks to configure Continue with config.yaml, add chat or tab autocomplete models, write rules or custom prompts, connect MCP servers, run cn headless in scripts, or migrate from config.json. Continue was acquired by Cursor in June 2026: the release from that month is final and the Hub is offline, so the skill covers local, self-configured use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aider is an open-source terminal AI pair programmer that edits files in your git repository with an LLM and commits each change. Use when a user asks to run Aider, let an AI refactor or fix code from the command line, script Aider with --message, auto-run lint and tests after edits, or point Aider at Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek or a local model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for building multimodal AI applications that combine text, images, audio, and video. Covers vision APIs, audio transcription, and unified pipelines. Use when "multimodal AI, vision API, image understanding, GPT-4V, Claude vision, audio transcription, Whisper, document extraction, image to text, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrating local LLMs into Godot games using NobodyWho and other Godot-native solutionsUse when "godot llm, nobodywho, godot ai npc, gdscript llm, godot local llm, godot chatgpt, godot 4 ai, godot, llm, nobodywho, gdscript, game-ai, npc, local-llm" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% by step 10. Build for reliability first, autonomy second. 2025 lesson: The winners are constrained, domain-specific agents with clear boundaries, not "autonomous everything." Treat AI outputs as proposals, not truth. Use when "autonomous agent, autogpt, babyagi, self-prompting, goal decomposition, react pattern, agent loop, self-correcting agent, reflection agent, langgraph, agentic ai, agent planning, autonomous, agents, langgraph, react, planning, reflection, guardrails, reliability, checkpointing" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic orchestration of AI-powered marketing workflows that combine content generation, approval processes, multi-channel distribution, and quality gates into cohesive automation systems. This skill integrates AI generation tools (Jasper, Claude, GPT) with automation platforms (Zapier, Make, n8n) and marketing systems to build scalable content pipelines. It focuses on maintaining brand consistency, implementing rigorous quality gates, and balancing automation with strategic human oversight. Key capabilities include designing parallel approval flows, monitoring costs, and architecting "invisible" automation that enhances productivity without sacrificing quality.Use when "AI workflow, automate content, content automation, workflow automation, AI pipeline, automated marketing, content distribution automation, approval workflow, scale content production, AI orchestration, automation, workflow, ai-orchestration, content-pipeline, approval-workflow, multi-channel, quality-gates, cost-control" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) specialist. Optimize content and websites to appear in AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and other LLM-powered search experiences. Use when the user asks about AI search optimization, AEO, GEO, AI Overviews, appearing in AI answers, LLM citations, or optimizing for generative search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI SEO workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI SEO workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。