789 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review Stellar Community Fund (SCF) Build Award applications. Use when evaluating SCF submissions, covering project fit assessment, technical architecture evaluation, team readiness, traction validation, budget analysis, and funding recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate the SCF team's manual prescreen on a Build Award submission — a completeness and eligibility check applied to every full submission before panel review. Checks completeness, Stellar integration, eligibility, budget issues, and common disqualifiers. Use when reviewing a draft Build Award submission for readiness before it goes to the SCF round.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit existing business processes to identify AI automation opportunities. TRIGGERS - Use when user wants to find AI opportunities, audit processes for automation, or assess AI readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MUST USE for building FastAPI/REST API applications with Aerospike database (aerospike-py Rust/PyO3 async client). Covers AsyncClient lifespan management, FastAPI Depends injection, aerospike_py exception-to-HTTP-status mapping (RecordNotFound→404, RecordExistsError→409, BackpressureError→503, AerospikeTimeoutError→504), POLICY_EXISTS_CREATE_ONLY/UPDATE_ONLY for CRUD semantics, NamedTuple attribute access (record.bins not tuple unpacking), client.ping() readiness probe, batch_read returning dict, batch_write with in_doubt retry signal, and global AerospikeError handler. Triggers on: FastAPI + Aerospike, REST API + aerospike-py, CRUD API with Aerospike, client.ping() health probe, batch_read/batch_write endpoint, web server/HTTP service backed by Aerospike NoSQL, uvicorn + Aerospike.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure designs define operability basics: SLO/SLI, monitoring, alerting, on-call actions, and incident handling expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure architecture docs define RPO/RTO, failover paths, data consistency, and DR drillability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure architecture diagrams are readable, consistent with text, and clear on scope, boundaries, and data flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce an evidence-backed release readiness opinion while keeping the human release decision separate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose repository and PWDEV Flow health without changing the project. Use when the user asks for a health check, workspace consistency check, dependency assessment, readiness report, or evidence-based scorecard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Confiabilidade da plataforma — SLO, error budget, capacidade, resiliência, ponto único de falha e revisão de prontidão. Use quando o usuário disser "SLA", "SLO", "disponibilidade", "resiliência", "aguenta?", "single point of failure", "production readiness", "quanto de folga temos".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate complete lifecycle work for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEM as a Cloud Service, from design and implementation through validation, release readiness, and incident troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prisma Compute deployment and hosting guide. Use whenever the user mentions Prisma Compute, `prisma.compute.ts`, `defineComputeConfig`, deploying or hosting a Prisma app, `@prisma/cli app deploy`, `compute:deploy`, `create-prisma --deploy`, `PRISMA_SERVICE_TOKEN`, Compute auth/workspaces, apps/deployments/build logs/domains, localhost vs `0.0.0.0`, deploy port binding, or framework deploy readiness for Hono, Elysia, Next.js, TanStack Start, Astro, Nuxt, Svelte, Nest, Turborepo, or custom/prebuilt artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citation readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about DOT audits, FMCSA compliance reviews, new entrant safety audits (NESA), focused investigations, what auditors actually ask for, audit document checklists, common audit failures, the audit ratings (Satisfactory / Conditional / Unsatisfactory), or how to prepare for an upcoming audit. Cite 49 CFR 385.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about driver fitness-for-duty programs — pre-trip readiness assessment, recognizing impairment from drugs/alcohol/medication/fatigue/mental health, refusing assignments when unfit, supervisor training on fitness assessment, FMCSA recommendations on duty status determination, and how to handle a driver who appears unfit. Reference 49 CFR 392.3 + 392.4.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about Driver Qualification Files (DQF) — what must be in a DQ file under 49 CFR 391, retention periods, what's required pre-hire vs ongoing, document expiration tracking, audit-readiness for driver files, common DQF deficiencies that auditors find, or how to handle missing documents on existing drivers. Always cite the specific subsection of 49 CFR 391.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a carrier asks about electric trucks — Tesla Semi, Freightliner eCascadia, Volvo VNR Electric, Peterbilt 579EV, range, charging, total cost of ownership, regulatory pushes (CARB ACT, ACF), incentives, infrastructure, depot vs en-route charging, and which routes/applications are EV-ready today.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。