「reviewer」の検索結果

Cross-Entity Disclosure Tracker App-in-Skill — a Busabase review workspace that helps a compliance/IR team assemble and track a standardized disclosure package per financing vehicle (fund/SPV), across a generic onshore origination entity, an offshore fund-manager entity, and a listing/exchange venue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-disclosure-tracker or /kelly-disclosure-tracker, wants to review disclosure checklists, vehicle readiness, cross-entity reconciliation flags, or reviewer notes across multiple financing vehicles. Review workspace only — it never files anything or calls any external system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal casebase App-in-Skill (Busabase-backed) intake and anonymization QA desk for law-firm judgment and award documents. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-casebase-ingest, mentions internal case database, 智能案例库, 裁判文书入库, 脱敏, 结构化, 分类标注, 案例审核, 质量验收, or wants a Busabase-backed desk where reviewers approve, revise, or block agent-prepared case records before they become searchable knowledge assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal-contract review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for NDAs, MSAs, DPAs, and SOWs. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-contracts or /kelly-legal-contracts, mentions legal, 法务, contract review, 合同审阅, NDA, MSA, DPA, SOW, redlines, clause playbook, legal intake, issue list, or wants a Busabase-backed review desk where a human legal reviewer approves, revises, or blocks agent-prepared contract issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs architectural code reviews focusing on design patterns, duplication, circular dependencies, and refactoring impact. Is the design consistent with the codebase? Use when reviewing code changes for architectural concerns, code smells, or structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a reviewer subagent against uncommitted local changes, a named branch, or a GitHub PR. Local and branch modes write a review file plus a summary to disk. PR mode posts the findings as a PENDING GitHub review for the user to inspect and submit through the UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full design-doc-writer and design-doc-reviewer loop until consensus. Produces a polished design document with a PR plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a clean, review-ready pull request with a good title, structured description, linked issues, and appropriate reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to process automated PR review feedback (Copilot, Greptile, Codex) and iterate until all AI threads are addressed, checks are green, and the PR is merge-ready. Trigger when the user says "address review feedback", "recycle reviews", or references an automated reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Stellar Community Fund (SCF) Build Award applications. Use when evaluating SCF submissions, covering project fit assessment, technical architecture evaluation, team readiness, traction validation, budget analysis, and funding recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help funded SCF teams write tranche submission reports. Use when a team has completed a tranche milestone and needs to document their deliverables for review to unlock the next payment. Covers deliverable documentation, completion evidence, demo preparation, and the specific format tranche reviewers expect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a backend build succeeds or whenever authentication, authorization, actor/identity handling, external service calls (IdP, JWKS, DB, clock), logging, observability, configuration or error contracts are in play — delegates to the backend-design-reviewer agent for a design-quality review of the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the screens, UX, wording, feedback after actions, accessibility, or layout of frontend/ come up, even without the word "review" — delegates to the frontend-ux-reviewer agent, which runs the dev screens against the Lean CLI with Playwright and reports with evidence. Not for reviewing the domain model itself (that is the ddd skill's review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before finishing a change, or when asked to clean up, review for slop, drift, stale docs, or duplicated rules — runs the deterministic unslop lint and, for prose-level slop, delegates to the unslop-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever SQL, ORM/jOOQ code, schema or migrations, indexes, N+1, or database load are in play, even without the word "review" — delegates the performance review of the current branch diff to the sql-performance-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a paper draft objectively and strictly. Identifies logic gaps, missing proofs, structural issues, and research weaknesses. Reviewer mode. Use for "analyze this paper", "find weaknesses in draft". 旧名 review-analyze。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), Pejaver-style calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying Whiffin-style absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic external-evidence web validation workflow for Sanguo ETL/RAG. USE FOR: 外部證據網站檢查、來源健康度、allowlist 驗證、來源 seed 覆蓋、3kweb-check、external evidence source health、fetch/parse/hash first、LLM reviewer second。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), Pejaver-style calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying Whiffin-style absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。