863 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a bug has multiple plausible causes across layers — competing hypotheses, validation loops, evidence-based conclusions — even when the user just says 'why is this happening?'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to consolidate multiple already-run judge verdicts into one report — consensus, conflicts, must-fix/should-fix with per-judge provenance. Consume-only, no opaque score, never auto-gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When running discovery interviews — question-bank build, bias audit, insight extraction. Triggers on 'audit my guide', 'extract insights from transcript', 'is my hypothesis falsifiable'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent web research with cross-fact-checking and verified synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[AI & Tools] Use when you need to apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Research] Use when you need to synthesize research findings into structured report using template.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route ordinary public-web information tasks to the correct Tavily CLI operation. Use when the task concerns publicly accessible webpages and needs web discovery, clean extraction, URL mapping, same-site crawling, or public-web-only research, but the exact Tavily operation is not yet clear or several operations must be sequenced. Prefer the specific leaf skill when intent is clear: tavily-search for discovery without a URL, tavily-extract for known URLs, tavily-map for URL/site-structure discovery, tavily-crawl for content from many pages on one site, tavily-research for cited multi-source synthesis, and tavily-dynamic-search for programmatic filtering with context isolation. Do not use for named social/community/media/career/code platforms, login or cookie-dependent content, platform-native discussions, or cross-platform collection; use Agent Reach there. Do not use for local files, Git operations, deployments, or ordinary code editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover ordinary public webpages with LLM-optimized Tavily search results. Use when no specific URL is known and the user needs a quick public-web lookup, articles, recent news, sources, or domain-filtered results. This is the default Tavily leaf for simple public-web discovery. Do not use when the user already supplied the target URL (use tavily-extract), wants URLs under one known site (tavily-map), wants many pages' content (tavily-crawl), needs a full cited synthesis (tavily-research), or needs named platforms, login state, platform-native content, or cross-platform collection (Agent Reach).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
创造性发散（DMN+CEN协同等效）。遇到思路瓶颈时触发，从认知体系中随机抽取「表面不相关」的跨领域概念，强制寻找结构相似性，生成非常规解法候选列表。触发词：「没有思路」「换个角度想」「帮我发散一下」「有什么不同的方向」「反常识的方案」「跨领域看这个问题」「想不到解法」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose a categorical news-roundup newsletter from Ahmad's OpenMark saves. Use when Ahmad wants a scannable "what happened in AI / tools / research / discourse" recap rather than a single-thesis essay. Trigger phrases include "roundup", "news roundup", "this week in AI", "weekly news", "what dropped this week", "category recap", "/newsletter-roundup". Output is bucketed by topic with 3–5 items per bucket, short blurbs, source-tagged for at-a-glance scanning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI voice generation, text-to-speech, and voice synthesis via inference.sh CLI. Models: Kokoro TTS, DIA, Chatterbox, Higgs, VibeVoice for natural speech. Capabilities: multiple voices, emotions, accents, long-form narration, conversation. Use for: voiceovers, audiobooks, podcasts, video nar...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statis...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standard Operating Procedures for web research, documentation lookup, evidence synthesis with citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Lean Six Sigma consulting skill supporting all belt levels (White Belt to Master Black Belt). Use this skill for DMAIC/DMADV project execution, Lean waste elimination (VSM, 8 Wastes/DOWNTIME, 5S), statistical analysis (process capability Cp/Cpk, control charts, hypothesis testing), and Six Sigma training/education. Triggers include "improve process", "reduce defects", "sigma level", "DMAIC project", "value stream mapping", "Kaizen", "process capability", "control chart", "root cause analysis", "5 Whys", "Fishbone diagram", "FMEA", "DOE", or requests involving process improvement methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance on writing high-quality requirements: the requirement quality characteristics and the EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns — ubiquitous, event-driven, state-driven, optional-feature, unwanted-behaviour — for unambiguous, singular, verifiable requirements, plus defect/anti-pattern review and verification & traceability. Use when authoring or reviewing requirements. Original synthesis citing EARS (Mavin et al.) and NASA public-domain guidance; not a reproduction of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 or the EARS paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST HB 151) — the practical statistics reference for engineering, metrology, and quality. Use for: exploratory data analysis and the four univariate assumptions (4-plot); measurement process characterization including bias/precision, calibration designs, gauge R&R, and ISO/GUM uncertainty budgets; production process characterization (stability vs. capability); process modeling and regression (LS/WLS/NLS/LOESS); design of experiments (screening, fractional/factorial, response-surface, Taguchi); statistical process control (Shewhart/CUSUM/EWMA charts, capability indices, acceptance sampling); product/process comparisons (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for 1/2/3+ groups, ANOVA, multiple comparisons); and reliability (lifetime & repair-rate models, accelerated testing, reliability growth). Scope limits: this is applied frequentist statistics for measurement and quality — it does NOT reproduce the per-distribution formula galleries, worked case studies, datasets, plot images, or Dataplot/R code of the original web Handbook (those are described, not copied); it is thin on modern machine learning, Bayesian methods beyond conjugate reliability priors, time-series/forecasting, and Bayesian experimental design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。