本文へ移動
cccskills

「trace」の検索結果

1,423 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Investigate why something happens — confirm the question and success criteria with you, then trace the root cause with an evidence chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月14日 更新

Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026年10月14日 更新

Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills662026年10月8日 更新

Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

ontoly

無料

Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dianel555/DSkills652026年10月12日 更新

Run the oncall handoff for a rotation window — the whole handoff, not just a document: build the summary (what the incoming oncall needs first, what's still open, incidents with impact numbers, alert and page counts, hygiene suggestions, every number traceable to a source), post it for the outgoing oncall to correct, walk the incoming oncall through the open items in the thread, update the list as they respond, and note when they acknowledge. Runs mainly in the team's standing oncall / monitoring channel, normally as a scheduled routine firing at rotation change so the report is waiting when the shift turns over; can also be run by hand and works from an incident channel. Use when a handoff routine fires, or on "handoff", "hand over", "oncall summary", "weekly oncall report", "what happened this shift / this week". Re-running for the same window updates the report rather than duplicating it. Unattended runs carry a run-summary block and at least one chart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-tag-plugins612026年10月8日 更新

Query and manage Sentry error-tracking data — list and search issues, drill into events and stack traces, inspect projects and releases, resolve/ignore issues, and pull stats. Use this whenever the user mentions a Sentry issue, crash, error group, or exception; pastes a sentry.io or self-hosted Sentry URL; asks "why is this erroring", "how many times has this happened", "what's the top error in {project}", "resolve this issue", or wants a Sentry-based digest — even if they don't say "API". Always start from this skill when interacting with this service — its bundled scripts and recipes are the fastest path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-tag-plugins612026年10月8日 更新

Query and manage PagerDuty — find out who's on call, list and manage incidents, read escalation policies and schedules, trace who got paged and why, acknowledge/resolve/snooze/escalate incidents, and create or update services. Use this whenever the user mentions PagerDuty, on-call, paging, escalation, an incident ID like `PXXXXXX` or `Q...`, asks "who's on call", "page the on-call", "ack this incident", "why wasn't I paged", or pastes a pagerduty.com URL — even if they don't say "API". Always start from this skill when interacting with this service — its bundled scripts and recipes are the fastest path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-tag-plugins612026年10月8日 更新

Investigate an alert, page, or production symptom in an incident channel or a team's oncall / monitoring channel, and report findings a human can verify. Ordinary conversation and chatter are not alerts; leave those alone. Use when an alert or page lands, when error rate, latency or saturation is up, when someone asks "why is X broken", "investigate", "what changed", "root cause this", pastes a monitor, dashboard, trace or error-tracker link, or reports production trouble; also by default when an alert lands in a covered channel unasked. Feed-level asks land here too ("which alerts matter", "triage today's alerts"), plus the scheduled alert-review routine and the ticket path ("customer X can't check out"). Runs a fast first pass posted as a short interim update with a TL;DR, every finding carrying the query or link to verify it, then proposes the fix and — with connector access and confirmation — carries it out, never unattended. Afterwards `incident-postmortem` writes it up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-tag-plugins612026年10月8日 更新

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modem-dev/ossrules602026年9月21日 更新

map-flows

無料

Use when asked to map or analyze flows, pipelines, processes, or sequences of events in this repo — e.g. "mapa el flujo", "flow", "pipeline", "ciclo de vida", "trace the request", "how does the build/release flow work", "diagrama del flujo". Maps data flows, request lifecycles, CI/CD pipelines, and state transitions with verified file:line evidence. Distinct from analyze-code (which maps code structure); this skill maps movement over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sazardev/networking-with-go582026年8月8日 更新

Instruments and workflow for debugging the VirtualList — the chat transcript (`InfiniteList`) and the sidebar (`FiniteList`). Covers the built-in consistency checker, the on-screen overlay, the five `?vl*` URL flags, the touch-gesture rig, the frame recorder, attaching to a real Android device over CDP, and how to read a trace without being fooled by a measurement artifact. Use when the list jumps while scrolling, blanks, sticks on skeletons, or the overscroll/bounce misbehaves. The component's specification is `docs/ui/virtual-list.md`; this skill is only how to *measure* it. Pairs with /debug-ui (browser side) and /server-loop (server side).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Actual-Chat/actual-chat562026年10月15日 更新

shiplog

無料

Git-as-knowledge-graph workflow for traceability. Use when planning work, brainstorming designs, creating/managing issues and PRs, tracking architectural decisions, or resuming prior sessions. Slash command /shiplog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

devallibus/shiplog562026年4月22日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos, WinRM, SMB, RDP, Windows credential material, replayable tickets, delegation edges, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to replay Kerberos material, trace a WinRM, SMB, or RDP pivot, understand host-to-host privilege movement, or prove which Windows service accepted a credential or ticket. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CTF web, API, SSR, frontend, queue-backed app, and routing challenges. Use when the user asks to inspect a site or API, follow real browser requests, debug auth or session flow, trace uploads or workers, find hidden routes, or explain why frontend and backend behavior diverge under sandbox-internal routing. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for CI/CD, registry, dependency drift, artifact provenance, image build, release pipeline, and runtime consumer challenges. Use when the user asks to trace dependency drift, registry pulls, malicious packages, build or release tampering, CI execution, artifact signing, or which shipped artifact the runtime actually consumes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for WebSocket and SSE handshakes, auth material, subscription state, realtime message schemas, reconnect behavior, and frame-driven runtime effects. Use when the user asks to inspect a WebSocket or SSE handshake, decode frames, trace subscriptions, follow reconnect logic, inspect auth material sent during realtime setup, or explain how live frames change rendered or persisted state. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSRF reachability, internal route probing, metadata-service access, credential pivoting, and token-to-accepted-privilege chains. Use when the user asks to trace SSRF sources, internal hosts, metadata endpoints, link-local tokens, service-account credentials, or explain how a server-side fetch edge turns into accepted access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for parser differentials, HTTP normalization gaps, ambiguous headers, path decoding drift, transfer-framing mismatches, and request smuggling routes. Use when the user asks to trace proxy and backend parse differences, conflicting path normalization, Host or forwarded-header ambiguity, CL/TE issues, or routing outcomes that differ across hops. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for queues, async workers, cron jobs, delayed tasks, retry behavior, worker-only config drift, and payload-to-side-effect chains. Use when the user asks to trace a queue payload, inspect async job execution, explain worker-only behavior, follow retries or dead-letter handling, or connect an enqueued item to a later file, cache, email, or privilege-bearing side effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for OAuth, OIDC, redirect flows, state or nonce handling, PKCE, token exchange, refresh logic, claim mapping, and accepted login paths. Use when the user asks to trace redirects, callback parameters, scopes, state, nonce, PKCE, refresh tokens, consent, or explain how an OAuth or OIDC chain turns into accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow542026年5月19日 更新