Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,953 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core UI/UX engineering skill for building highly interactive, spatial, weightless, and glassmorphism-based web interfaces using GSAP and 3D CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release work; not ordinary contribution tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a Mac awake with caffeinate during long builds, downloads, or supervised automation runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Snapshot of a single wallet's token holdings on a specific chain — list of every token currently held with name, symbol, current price, 24h price change, and holding quantity. Use when the user provides an explicit wallet address (or says "my wallet") and wants the current portfolio: "what does 0x... hold", "wallet balance breakdown", "list positions for this address", "what tokens are in this wallet", "show me the holdings of <address>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns resume duties into truthful impact bullets. Questions the user role by role to dig out achievements, asks for real numbers or honest ranges (never invents them), and writes concise bullets in XYZ, CAR, scope or qualitative form. Use when the user says "rewrite my bullets", "make this bullet stronger", "quantify my resume", "turn my duties into achievements", "improve my experience section", "my resume sounds boring", "I don't have any numbers", pastes resume lines for feedback, or works in a low-number job (nursing, teaching, care, trades, admin, creative). With the Reactive Resume MCP server connected, it edits experience, project, volunteer and education descriptions with apply_resume_patch after the user approves. Use resume-content-guide instead for which sections or details belong and for summaries or headlines, resume-tailor to fit one job posting, interview-prep or mock-interview for interview stories and practice, and resume-builder to build a resume from scratch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing suspected malware through static, dynamic, and behavioral techniques, including IOC extraction, YARA or Sigma rules, sandboxing, and anti-analysis behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse JavaScript-based custom DSL/VM interpreters, non-standard WASM-like runtimes, and risk-control engines. Use when analyzing IIFE or switch-based opcode dispatchers, extracting instruction tables, recovering bytecode semantics, capturing VM state at runtime, or reconstructing execution flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize vector index performance for latency, recall, and memory. Use when tuning HNSW parameters, selecting quantization strategies, or scaling vector search infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement efficient similarity search with vector databases. Use when building semantic search, implementing nearest neighbor queries, or optimizing retrieval performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python configuration management via environment variables and typed settings. Use when externalizing config, setting up pydantic-settings, managing secrets, or implementing environment-specific behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for LLM applications with vector databases and semantic search. Use when implementing knowledge-grounded AI, building document Q&A systems, or integrating LLMs with external knowledge bases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select and optimize embedding models for semantic search and RAG applications. Use when choosing embedding models, implementing chunking strategies, or optimizing embedding quality for specific domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured messaging protocols for agent team communication including message type selection, plan approval, shutdown procedures, and anti-patterns to avoid. Use this skill when establishing communication norms for a newly spawned team, when deciding whether to send a direct message or a broadcast, when a team-lead needs to review and approve an implementer's plan before work begins, when orchestrating a graceful team shutdown after all tasks are complete, or when debugging why teammates are not coordinating correctly at integration points.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix flake-prone anti-patterns in an existing Cypress suite, and APIs removed in Cypress 12 to 16. Bundles a zero-dependency scanner for fixed cy.wait() delays, assigned command return values, async/await, force: true, chaining after actions, one-shot expect() inside .then(), conditional testing, and removed APIs such as Cypress.env(), cy.exec(), cy.server()/cy.route(). Use when asked to fix flaky Cypress tests, remove cy.wait, stabilize or harden a Cypress suite, audit Cypress specs, debug "detached from the DOM" errors, or prepare an upgrade to Cypress 15 or 16.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenInference semantic conventions and instrumentation for Phoenix AI observability. Use when implementing LLM tracing, creating custom spans, or deploying to production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an outage, production incident, or significant service degradation has occurred and the team needs to write a structured blameless post-mortem. Triggers on phrases like "write a post-mortem", "incident review", "what went wrong", "outage report", "root cause analysis", or "RCA". Covers timeline reconstruction, contributing factor analysis, impact quantification, and action item generation with owners.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when a user needs a screenshot, website thumbnail, full-page capture, or PDF of a public HTTP(S) webpage saved as a local artifact through Latchshot, including report, QA, archive, and social-preview workflows. Do not use it for private or authenticated pages, raw HTML, scraping or extraction, arbitrary browser actions, CAPTCHA or anti-bot bypass, or local-file capture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-breach impact analysis: inventories sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, credentials), traces data flows, scores exposure vectors, and produces a regulatory blast radius report with fine ranges sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155(a), and HIPAA 45 CFR § 160.404. Cost benchmarks from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report (annually updated). All citations in references/SOURCES.md for verification. Use when asked: "assess breach impact", "what data could be exposed", "calculate blast radius", "data exposure analysis", "how bad would a breach be", "quantify data risk", "sensitive data inventory", "data flow security audit", "pre-breach assessment", "worst-case breach scenario", "breach readiness", "data risk report", "/data-breach-blast-radius". For any stack handling user data, health records, or financial information. Output labels law-sourced figures (exact) vs heuristic estimates (planning only). Does not replace legal counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。