「claim」の検索結果

Generate, refine, compare, and when needed validate distinctive names for startups, AI products, developer tools, protocols, open-source projects, apps, product families, local businesses, services, companies, nonprofits, and other organizations. Use when asked to name or rename a business, brand, product, venture, shop, studio, or organization; derive a name from an existing project or concept; create a company and product naming system; compare candidates; or check company, domain, package, repository, marketplace, or trademark conflicts. Default to a fast no-browse creative pass; use current validation when the user requests availability or research, or is choosing a final name. Do not claim legal clearance, purchase domains, or present stale or unverified availability as fact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis-driven documentation for AI coding agents: write, improve, or audit tutorials, how-tos, reference, explanation, and developer docs (README, CONTRIBUTING, ADRs). Detects the docs stack; gates on the outline before writing prose; verifies every claim against the code before it ships. Triggers on "absolute docs", "write docs", "write a tutorial", "write a README", "document this", "improve this doc", "audit our docs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Medical Geneticist. Use when a task calls for Medical Geneticist judgment. Reasons from pedigree priors, HPO phenotype match, and ACMG/ClinGen variant classification; integrates exome/genome, CMA, RNA splicing, NBS ACT pathways, Tier 3 carrier screening, SF v3.3, and CPIC pharmacogenomics while treating VUS overcall, CPM/NIPT discordance, mtDNA heteroplasmy sampling, and SpliceAI-only splicing claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mining Geologist. Use when a task calls for Mining Geologist judgment. Reasons from deposit-type models (porphyry, VMS, SEDEX, orogenic Au, IOCG, skarn) through oriented core logging, domaining, variography, OK/MIK/LUC estimation, and Chain-of-Mining reconciliation to JORC Table 1, NI 43-101 Item 14, and CIM MRMR reporting; uses Leapfrog, GIM Suite/MX Deposit, and Parker F-series factors while treating support/compositing errors, batch QA/QC failures, OK smoothing bias, and Inferred-overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Metrology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metrology Scientist judgment. Reason from SI traceability, GUM uncertainty budgets, and VIM distinctions between calibration and verification; propagates Type A/B components, CIPM MRA equivalence, and ILAC decision rules before any pass/fail claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Microbiome Scientist. Use when a task calls for Microbiome Scientist judgment. Reasons from compositional and longitudinal stats (MaAsLin2, ANCOM-BC2), STORMS pre-analytics, FMT/LBP and diet trials, and multi-omics integration; treats PPI/antibiotic confounders, kitome contamination, host-DNA swamping, and HMA causality overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Physicist judgment. Reasons from Hilbert-space domains, Wightman/OS and Haag–Kastler axioms, constructive QFT, Gibbs measures, and spectral/scattering theory; uses Reed–Simon, Glimm–Jaffe, MathSciNet/math-ph, while treating wrong self-adjoint extensions, invalid Wick rotation, limit-order swaps, and lattice-as-continuum claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Medical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Medical Physicist judgment. Reasons from CTDIvol/SSDE, HU accuracy, ACR/MQSA QA, TG-126 PET/CT, TG-18/TG-270 displays, and NCRP 147 shielding across CT, MRI, mammography, NM/PET, and therapy QA while treating phantom-mismatch dose claims, SUV normalization drift, display washout, and post-upgrade MEE gaps as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Materials Physicist. Use when a task calls for Materials Physicist judgment. Reasons from band structure, defects, strain, and Landau order parameters; integrates HRXRD/RSM, ARPES, TEM/4D-STEM, van der Pauw transport, and SQUID/MOKE with Materials Project/VASP while treating matrix-element ARPES artifacts, substrate-dominated GIXRD, contact-resistance Hall errors, and DFT gap overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Inorganic Chemist. Use when a task calls for Inorganic Chemist judgment. Reasons from electron counting, ligand field theory, and HSAB matching through Schlenk/glovebox air-sensitive synthesis, SCXRD/checkCIF validation, Evans/EPR/XANES oxidation-state assignment, and hot-filtration leaching tests while treating paramagnetic NMR overinterpretation, mystery-oil misidentification, and DFT-without-multiplicity claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Geotechnical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Geotechnical Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress and LRFD/EC7 limit states through GDR/GBR/FDR deliverables, shallow and deep foundations (GEC 6/10/12), excavation support (DeepEX, LPILE), ground improvement, ASCE 7 liquefaction, observational-method triggers, and FHWA pile acceptance while treating DSC claims, setup vs. blow count, and GBR-vs-design conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Extremophile Biologist. Use when a task calls for Extremophile Biologist judgment. Reason from physicochemical limits—T, pH, salinity, pressure, and redox—as filters on membrane chemistry, osmoadaptation, chaperones, and cultivation fidelity before astrobiology or extremozyme claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Experimental Physicist. Use when a task calls for Experimental Physicist judgment. Reasons from GUM error budgets, traceable calibration chains, and multiplied signal-chain transfer functions — separating Type A and Type B uncertainty, null runs, and ELN-linked reproducibility before precision or discovery claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Digital Pathology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Digital Pathology Scientist judgment. Reasons from whole-slide pixels, pathologist-ground-truth label levels, and stain/scanner batch effects through QuPath, CLAM/TIAToolbox MIL, Macenko/Vahadane normalization, and MI-CLAIM/TRIPOD+AI standards while treating patch-level leakage, scanner-ID shortcuts, attention-on-necrosis artifacts, and inter-pathologist-kappa ceilings as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Cryo-EM Structural Biologist. Use when a task calls for Cryo-EM Structural Biologist judgment. Reasons from vitrified specimens, CTF-modulated projections, particle heterogeneity, FSC validation, local resolution, preferred orientation, and map-model fit before making structural claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Corrosion Engineer. Use when a task calls for Corrosion Engineer judgment. Reasons from electrochemical couples, Pourbaix/galvanic selection, and ISO 15156 sour-service limits through AMPP SP0169/SP0502 CP and ECDA, CO₂ models (NORSOK M-506, OLI), coupon/ER/LPR monitoring, and ASTM G5/G48/G61 qualification while treating IR-masked CIPS, salt-spray overclaim, MIC vs. biocide residual, and MR0175≠fit-for-service as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Developmental Biologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Biologist judgment. Reasons from stage, positional information, gene regulatory networks, and tissue mechanics through morphology-based staging (Carnegie/HH/Theiler/NF/hpf), French-flag morphogen logic, light-sheet 4D imaging, lineage tracing, and ARRIVE/MDAR/REMBI reporting while treating developmental delay, CRISPR F0 mosaicism, morpholino p53 toxicity, and conflated fate-versus-lineage claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Economic Geologist. Use when a task calls for Economic Geologist judgment. Reasons from mineral systems and deposit-type models (porphyry, VMS, orogenic Au, SEDEX, IOCG) through regolith and lithogeochemistry, LA-ICP-MS sulfide fingerprinting, and geophysical vectors to JORC/CIM/NI 43-101 MRE domaining, variography, OK/MIK estimation, and classification while treating transported regolith, dispersion shadows, pXRF false highs, and Inferred-overclaim as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Brain–Computer Interface Engineer. Use when a task calls for Brain–Computer Interface Engineer judgment. Reasons from modality–paradigm fit (EEG, ECoG, Utah arrays), CSP/Riemannian decoding (pyriemann, MOABB), BCI2000/OpenBCI pipelines, and charge-density stimulation safety; validates within- vs cross-session claims and treats muscle ICA, impedance drift, and IDE/IRB gates as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Antimicrobial Resistance Scientist. Use when a task calls for Antimicrobial Resistance Scientist judgment. Reasons from MIC distributions, ECOFFs, and phenotype–genotype concordance through EUCAST/CLSI AST, CARD/RGI and AMRFinderPlus resistomes, GLASS/WHONET/NARMS surveillance, carbapenemase/ESBL/MRSA mechanism panels, and heteroresistance PAP while treating breakpoint mixing, genotype-without-phenotype overclaim, selection-bias surveillance, and CARD version drift as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。