1,186 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code quality checks, formatting, and metrics via qlty CLI
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines. Use at project start to establish code quality, testing standards, and architectural constraints that guide all development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build research slides with text-first source (Slidev/Marp/Reveal/Quarto) and reproducible export (PDF). Includes structure, figure reuse rules, and quality checklist for top-tier scientific presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Skills meta-skill: extract domain material (docs/APIs/code/specs) into a reusable Skill (SKILL.md + references/scripts/assets), and refactor existing Skills for clarity, activation reliability, and quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Golang projects — running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and selecting linters. Use when configuring golangci-lint, asking about lint warnings or nolint suppressions, setting up code quality tooling, or choosing linters. Also use when the user mentions golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, or revive. Not for wiring a lint step into a GitHub Actions pipeline (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Choosing between coding agents on evidence: compare executor or agent choices on reproducible tasks using quality, cost, time, tool, and evidence metrics. Use when the user says: agent-evaluation, agent evaluation, agent eval, agent benchmark, executor evaluation, executor benchmark, compare agents, compare codex claude.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build the email HTML", "make this email responsive", "fix dark-mode rendering", or "QA the email across clients"; produces the coded HTML build — a responsive table layout, dark-mode + accessibility pass, a client-render matrix, image-block fallbacks, and a plain-text parity check. Not for writing the copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件HTML/响应式邮件/暗色模式渲染
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-powered quality verification using prompt hooks. Validates commit messages, code patterns, and conventions using AI before allowing operations. Use to set up intelligent guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-configure quality gates, hooks, and settings for a new project. Detects project type and sets up appropriate tooling. Use when onboarding a new codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data engineering patterns for ETL pipelines, data warehousing, Apache Spark, and data quality validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PHP type juggling and weak comparison (`==`) bypass. Use when authentication, HMAC/signature checks, or token validation uses loose equality, numeric coercion, or hash comparisons without strict types — common in legacy PHP and CTF-style code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frontend development skill for React, Next.js, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS applications. Use when building React components, optimizing Next.js performance, analyzing bundle sizes, scaffolding frontend projects, implementing accessibility, or reviewing frontend code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-encoder reranking and MMR diversity filtering for improved retrieval quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish project governing principles including dev guidelines, code quality standards, testing policies, UX requirements, performance benchmarks, and security constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up or run design QA gates — token + hardcoded-value lint, automated a11y (axe), contrast, visual regression across variants/states/themes/RTL, and the manual a11y checklist. Use when the user wants CI quality gates, to prevent design regressions, or to QA a component/screen before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade an existing website or app to premium quality without breaking functionality — audit the current design, identify generic/AI tells, then apply taste and system rules surgically. Use when the user wants to improve, modernize, polish, or "make better" an existing UI/codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。