「compute」の検索結果

Transform Claude Code into a fully autonomous agent system with persistent memory, scheduled operations, computer use, and task queuing. Replaces standalone agent frameworks (Hermes, AutoGPT) by leveraging Claude Code's native crons, dispatch, MCP tools, and memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill teaches security teams how to detect and respond to unauthorized cryptocurrency mining operations in cloud environments. It covers identifying cryptomining indicators through compute usage anomalies, network traffic patterns to mining pools, GuardDuty CryptoCurrency findings, and runtime process monitoring on EC2, ECS, EKS, and Azure Automation workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configuring Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) to enforce per-request identity verification for Compute Engine, App Engine, Cloud Run, and GKE services using access levels, context-aware policies, and programmatic access with service accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat landscape reports with temporal trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-516C (Airworthiness Certification Criteria). Use for DoD air-system airworthiness planning: tailoring a certification basis, systems engineering criteria, and domain clusters for structures, flight technology, propulsion/installation, avionics/electrical/E3/diagnostics, computer systems/software, and crew systems (including applicable UAS control-station elements). Qualitative guidance handbook — not raw contractual requirements. Does not replace service airworthiness authority policy, civil FAA certification rules as authorities, or detailed JSSG/MIL performance specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-first Research pipeline with live gates, source/PDF evidence, claim boundaries, compute and publication controls; includes an optional PubMed/arXiv standard-library helper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a DRAFT weekly KPI report from the figures the user pastes or attaches (this week, last week, optionally target and earlier weeks): a metrics table with change versus last week computed only from the stated figures, plain-language notes per metric, and numbered questions on every figure that moved more than the agreed threshold, crossed its target or broke its run. Use when the user asks to "write the weekly KPI report", "turn these numbers into this week's metrics report", "what changed versus last week", "draft the Monday numbers update" or "add commentary to this metrics table". Do not use for a recurring emailed report with a maintained trend sheet, use report-attachment-analyzer instead; for actuals versus budget, use budget-variance-explainer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a web page on the host and measure it - screenshots, computed styles, element boxes and post-script text - when a page only exists after its scripts run or when the question is about layout. Covers choosing between web_fetch and a render, reading a design's real measurements, comparing viewports, and the egress policy that decides what may be reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the user's host machine directly through Cua, with no sandbox. Maps to Cua's Localhost API. Higher risk - the agent can click, type, and run shell commands on the real desktop. Use only when the user explicitly opts in and read the safety section first. Triggers - "control my computer", "click here", "use my real Chrome", "no sandbox", "내 컴퓨터 자동화".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read this machine's cross-machine mailbox, the messages another computer's agent left here over a file-synced bus folder, and send messages back the same way. A session-start hook shows new mail automatically; this is the on-demand mid-session re-check. Triggers: "/inbox", "check inbox", "messages from the other machine".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move or sync the hub role of an agent-plus-vault setup between computers, where an always-on desktop is the hub and laptops are satellites. Checklist with counters verified before and after, and it never migrates silently. Triggers: "/migrate", "/migrate check", "/migrate pack", "/migrate bootstrap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track our share of voice", "what share of the conversation do we own vs competitors", or "trend our SOV this quarter"; computes SOV% = brand mentions ÷ (brand + competitor panel mentions) per platform per period on a LOCKED competitor panel — a panel switch invalidates the trend (restart the series and log the break; the ECHO O3 rule) — plus a sentiment-weighted SOV variant (sentiment labeled Estimated unless human-coded) and a Wikipedia-pageviews attention-share alternative; built from keyless listening connectors, gdelt.py news echo, and user exports — public counts only, closed platforms are never scraped. Not for backlink or offsite SEO signals — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 声量份额/竞品声量对比/提及份额/注意力份额

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation for stateless filtering, field selection, and per-document field transformation. Use for WHERE clauses, projecting fields, computing new fields from existing ones, or data cleansing. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (renaming alone is usually a projection, not a derivation). Use when user says "filter-transform derivation", "derivation to filter by status", "transformation with WHERE clause", "derive computed fields", "cleanse data with a derivation", or "stateless derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Vision Image Analysis SDK for captions, tags, objects, OCR, people detection, and smart cropping. Use for computer vision and image understanding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Machine Learning SDK v2 for Python. Use for ML workspaces, jobs, models, datasets, compute, and pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deploying or managing an app that uses Prisma Composer (`@prisma/composer`): wiring its services and Modules, running it locally, testing composed services, or standing up / tearing down an environment. Triggers on "prisma composer", "@prisma/composer", "prisma app", `prisma deploy`, `prisma dev`, `compute()`, `module()`, `contract()`, `service.load()`, `mockService`, `bootstrapService`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Alchemy — alchemy Web3 development platform management including app configuration, RPC endpoint health, webhook notifications, NFT API usage, Enhanced APIs, gas optimization, and usage analytics. Covers request volume monitoring, error rates, compute unit consumption, and multi-chain endpoint health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Compute Engine VM, Cloud SQL, Persistent Disk, and serverless (Cloud Functions/Cloud Run) utilization to identify right-sizing opportunities. Uses Cloud Monitoring metrics with anti-hallucination rules for E2 shared-core instances, sole-tenant nodes, preemptible/spot VMs, SUD eligibility, peak vs average analysis, CUD-aware savings, and estimated monthly savings calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Cost Optimization — aWS native cost optimization using Compute Optimizer, Trusted Advisor cost checks, Savings Plan analysis, Cost Explorer, and resource rightsizing. Covers EC2 rightsizing, idle resource detection, Savings Plan and Reserved Instance recommendations, and cost anomaly detection. Use when optimizing AWS infrastructure costs with native AWS tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gym workout planner and nutrition tracker. Search 690+ exercises by muscle, equipment, or category via wger. Look up macros and calories for 380,000+ foods via USDA FoodData Central. Compute BMI, TDEE, one-rep max, macro splits, and body fat — pure Python, no pip installs. Built for anyone chasing gains, cutting weight, or just trying to eat better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。