「copilot」の検索結果

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, data and AI governance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CDO review", "pressure-test the data governance in this plan", "what would a CDO say about this", "check the metric definitions and data sources" or "prepare this for the data governance board". Do not use for security controls or third-party security risk, use ciso-reviewer instead; for contract, liability or regulatory terms, use general-counsel-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT board paper skeleton from the sponsor's inputs: purpose, recommendation as the sponsor states it, options including do nothing, risks, financials exactly as provided, authority to decide and the decision sought, with every claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so the sponsor sees what still needs support. Use when the user asks to "draft a board paper", "structure the committee paper", "prepare the decision paper for the investment committee", "skeleton the board memo" or "what goes in the paper for the audit committee". Do not use for a pre-read or briefing pack with no resolution sought, use executive-briefing-pack instead; to record a decision already taken in a discussion, use decision-memo-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEPRECATED: This skill has been replaced by `mcp-app-builder`. Check if `mcp-app-builder` is available in the skills folder. If not, install it: `npx skills install mcp-use/mcp-use --skill mcp-app-builder` Use `mcp-app-builder` instead of this skill. Build ChatGPT apps with interactive widgets using mcp-use and OpenAI Apps SDK. Use when creating ChatGPT apps, building MCP servers with widgets, defining React widgets, working with Apps SDK, or when user mentions ChatGPT widgets, mcp-use widgets, or Apps SDK development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEPRECATED: This skill has been replaced by `mcp-app-builder`. Check if `mcp-app-builder` is available in the skills folder. If not, install it: `npx skills install mcp-use/mcp-use --skill mcp-app-builder` Use `mcp-app-builder` instead of this skill. Build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with mcp-use framework. Use when creating MCP servers, defining tools/resources/prompts, working with mcp-use, bootstrapping MCP projects, or when user mentions MCP development, tools, resources, or prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**MANDATORY for ALL MCP server work** - mcp-use framework best practices and patterns. **READ THIS FIRST** before any MCP server work, including: - Creating new MCP servers - Modifying existing MCP servers (adding/updating tools, resources, prompts, widgets) - Debugging MCP server issues or errors - Reviewing MCP server code for quality, security, or performance - Answering questions about MCP development or mcp-use patterns - Making ANY changes to server.tool(), server.resource(), server.prompt(), or widgets This skill contains critical architecture decisions, security patterns, and common pitfalls. Always consult the relevant reference files BEFORE implementing MCP features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Microsoft Advertising measurement, UET, search and audience campaigns, Google imports, syndication, keywords, creative, bidding, budgets, Copilot inventory, and policy. Use for Microsoft Ads, Bing Ads, UET, Microsoft Audience Network, Google Ads import, or Microsoft campaign optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A skill that localizes contents into given locales.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating or updating effective portable skills with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Use for Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or shared-catalog skill work after selecting the target host and installation path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs skills from aigb-skills into a coding agent's skill directory. Use when setting up aigb-skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, or Pi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Markdown で提案書・報告書・議事録などのビジネスドキュメントを構造的に作成するスキル。対象読者に応じた表現で、そのまま使える品質を目指す。

Microsoft Learn の公式ドキュメントを調査し、正確で最新の情報を構造的にまとめるスキル。Azure サービスの仕様確認、機能比較、ベストプラクティスの調査に使用する。

顧客企業の情報、業界動向、導入事例を調査し、提案・プリセールス活動に役立つインサイトを構造的にまとめるスキル。

SVG でスライドを設計し、Python スクリプト (svg2pptx.py) で編集可能な PPTX に変換するスキル。デザイントークン・カラーパレット・レイアウト原則を統一し、高品質なプレゼンスライドを生成する。

Use every time you push a commit to an active pull request, to verify the PR is truly stable before reporting merge readiness. Covers the post-push wait window, AI review audit (Copilot/Greptile/Codex), and the gh commands to snapshot PR state. Trigger on "I pushed" or "is the PR ready to merge".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to process automated PR review feedback (Copilot, Greptile, Codex) and iterate until all AI threads are addressed, checks are green, and the PR is merge-ready. Trigger when the user says "address review feedback", "recycle reviews", or references an automated reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。